Uh... Nope.
LM's contracts, not its corporation, are beholding to those who award the contracts. You reason poorly that because some aspect of LM has oversight that all of LM must have oversight.
Now just who are these overseers who manage to fool these hard-working, honest employees and contractors at LM? Evidence, Tom, do you have any?
So you think that the Lockheed Martin can handle classified technologies without government oversight?
Because anyone with an IQ above room temperature knows that they can't.
Or is Tom saying that they, too, aren't aware of what they're doing? Even though they build their own rockets and have tested them independently, NASA's mere presence as a customer is somehow able to fool them into thinking they have built something that works but actually doesn't, that their entire product is a fraud even when sold to civilian customers and no one has realized it yet. Does everything NASA touches turn to stone? Please explain how this works, Tom.
Well, Government Contractors can't build and test their own space rockets independently, I'm not sure where you got that from. All contract work is done on secured government research bases under instruction of government managers.
NASA's role isn't a "mere customer" to Lockheed Martin. It's the client Lockheed Martin is temping its employees out to. Lockheed Martin, like all government contractors, is a temp agency.
A Lockheed Martin headhunter finds your resume on Monster, calls you up, puts you through an interview and vetting process with a government manager, acquiring any secret clearances if necessary, and if they like you, you're hired and sent to work on a secured government base. Every two weeks the government pays Lockheed, Lockheed cuts out a slice of your check (often a big slice) for themselves, and sends the rest to you. That's how they work.
For the most part when working for a government contractor you're a government employee. Your direction and instructions comes from government managers. Lockheed Martin is the government's version of Manpower Staffing.
The government does it this way to reduce liability. If a government contractor comes to work drunk and ends up hurting a bunch of people with the military weapons he's working on the government can just say "oh, that's a Northroop Grumman employee, sue them," despite that the contractor's only interaction with Northrop Grumman is a paycheck.