Wikipedian Outrage

  • 43 Replies
  • 8675 Views
Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #30 on: November 23, 2011, 03:44:25 PM »
They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.
Y'all be trippin'

*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6767
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #31 on: November 23, 2011, 07:08:57 PM »
They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.

You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.

Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #32 on: November 24, 2011, 07:47:35 AM »
They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.

You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.

This might surprise you seeing as how you're the kind of person who goes with a stupid, outdated theory about the shape of the earth because you think it makes you cooler than the "sheep" who aren't stupid enough to go against accepted fact for the sake of non-conformity, but some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!  :o Shocking, isn't it?
Y'all be trippin'

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #33 on: November 24, 2011, 08:34:20 AM »
some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!

How boring.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

squevil

  • Official Member
  • 3184
  • Im Telling On You
Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #34 on: November 25, 2011, 06:01:42 AM »
some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!

How boring.

your statement sounds like your agreeing with him. if we are all unique then that makes us the same

*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6767
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #35 on: November 25, 2011, 11:06:03 AM »
They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.

You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.

This might surprise you seeing as how you're the kind of person who goes with a stupid, outdated theory about the shape of the earth because you think it makes you cooler than the "sheep" who aren't stupid enough to go against accepted fact for the sake of non-conformity, but some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!  :o Shocking, isn't it?

My point is that, although you doubtless consider your username to be a clever jab at us, it is literally the most generic one could possibly have chosen, with the possible exception of tombishopsucks. I even consider it to be more generic then llortamai

Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #36 on: November 25, 2011, 12:54:40 PM »
They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.

You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.

This might surprise you seeing as how you're the kind of person who goes with a stupid, outdated theory about the shape of the earth because you think it makes you cooler than the "sheep" who aren't stupid enough to go against accepted fact for the sake of non-conformity, but some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!  :o Shocking, isn't it?

My point is that, although you doubtless consider your username to be a clever jab at us, it is literally the most generic one could possibly have chosen, with the possible exception of tombishopsucks. I even consider it to be more generic then llortamai

That's a silly assumption on your part.
Is tombishopsucks taken? Because that's a good one.
Y'all be trippin'

*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6767
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #37 on: November 25, 2011, 01:25:44 PM »
They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.

You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.

This might surprise you seeing as how you're the kind of person who goes with a stupid, outdated theory about the shape of the earth because you think it makes you cooler than the "sheep" who aren't stupid enough to go against accepted fact for the sake of non-conformity, but some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!  :o Shocking, isn't it?

My point is that, although you doubtless consider your username to be a clever jab at us, it is literally the most generic one could possibly have chosen, with the possible exception of tombishopsucks. I even consider it to be more generic then llortamai

That's a silly assumption on your part.
Is tombishopsucks taken? Because that's a good one.

Probably. And it most likely has an avatar that is like Tom's old one, but they messed with it in MS Paint. And 51 posts.

Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #38 on: November 25, 2011, 01:28:59 PM »
They should also change their logo so that it's not clearly spherical. That offends me a lot.

You have a very unique username. There are none like it. You are special.

This might surprise you seeing as how you're the kind of person who goes with a stupid, outdated theory about the shape of the earth because you think it makes you cooler than the "sheep" who aren't stupid enough to go against accepted fact for the sake of non-conformity, but some people - myself included - don't actually do things just to be different, unique and "special"!  :o Shocking, isn't it?

My point is that, although you doubtless consider your username to be a clever jab at us, it is literally the most generic one could possibly have chosen, with the possible exception of tombishopsucks. I even consider it to be more generic then llortamai

That's a silly assumption on your part.
Is tombishopsucks taken? Because that's a good one.

Probably. And it most likely has an avatar that is like Tom's old one, but they messed with it in MS Paint. And 51 posts.

Hmm. Nope. Looks like there's Tom Bishop's Daddy, Tom Bishop Is Gay, Tom Bishop Is A Failure, tom bishop is stupid, Torn Bishop, and - my personal favorite - Tim Bishop, but no Tom Bishop Sucks. I'm sure someone will get around to it, though.

Or "Tom Rook". Because of the chess piece. That'd be a clever one.
Y'all be trippin'

Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #39 on: November 28, 2011, 12:09:56 PM »
Yes, our page.

Flat Earth Society doesn't own that page, sorry.

No, but it's a page about us. If someone were to write a biography of me, it would be my biography.

Because that's the same thing.

It kind of is. Also, you are obviously Parsifal's alt.

Obviously you don't know anything because my ip address is clearly posted and I am no alt. Being a moderator you should watch your accusations more closely.
The FAQ needs updating to reflect the falsehood of the FAQ.

Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #40 on: November 28, 2011, 12:11:31 PM »
"Your page."
I have personally made contributions to this page. I consider it to be partially my work.

I personally just made contributions to this joke of a website, therefore I consider it to be partially my joke.
The FAQ needs updating to reflect the falsehood of the FAQ.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42602
Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #41 on: November 28, 2011, 01:03:53 PM »
Obviously you don't know anything because my ip address is clearly posted and I am no alt. Being a moderator you should watch your accusations more closely.

First of all, only you (and forum admins) can see your IP address.  Secondly, even if he could see it, IP addresses are easy enough to spoof.  Third, Tausami is not a moderator.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #42 on: November 28, 2011, 01:37:51 PM »
Obviously you don't know anything because my ip address is clearly posted and I am no alt. Being a moderator you should watch your accusations more closely.

First of all, only you (and forum admins) can see your IP address.  Secondly, even if he could see it, IP addresses are easy enough to spoof.  Third, Tausami is not a moderator.

Stand corrected but I don't need an alt to say what is on my mind, wouldn't even be neccesary.
The FAQ needs updating to reflect the falsehood of the FAQ.

Re: Wikipedian Outrage
« Reply #43 on: November 28, 2011, 01:38:42 PM »
Obviously you don't know anything because my ip address is clearly posted and I am no alt. Being a moderator you should watch your accusations more closely.

First of all, only you (and forum admins) can see your IP address.  Secondly, even if he could see it, IP addresses are easy enough to spoof.  Third, Tausami is not a moderator.

I'm a moderator on about 3 other sites, I am familiar with IP address spoofiing.
The FAQ needs updating to reflect the falsehood of the FAQ.