Reason why earth is flat

  • 26 Replies
  • 4012 Views
?

Tgor

  • 131
  • Universe Accelerator
Reason why earth is flat
« on: November 13, 2011, 06:39:55 PM »
I just realized why the earth is flat when all other celestial bodies are spherical. Could it be possible that only flat planets could support life.
I dont care what you think as long as it's about me.

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2011, 06:04:56 PM »
That makes so much sense i might just poop myself

*

Lorddave

  • 16451
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2011, 03:11:57 AM »
In before RM.
I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2011, 11:38:22 PM »
I still canít believe it, those remains theory and no dense evidence from science. How itíll be able to rotate on its axis and revolve around the sun without loosing on the orbit. These theories really confused yet got my curiosity.

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2011, 12:35:16 AM »
I still can’t believe it, those remains theory and no dense evidence from science. How it’ll be able to rotate on its axis and revolve around the sun without loosing on the orbit. These theories really confused yet got my curiosity.

The general FE consensus is that the Earth (and the rest of the Universe) is being accelerated upwards, with the exception of objects on the Earth's surface of course. The celestial bodies then execute their movements around the Earth so as to create the illusion of a round Earth.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2011, 03:39:07 PM by jraffield1 »
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12253
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2011, 12:42:35 PM »
The general FE consensus is that the Earth is stationary
Of course, this is not the general consensus. Remember the part when the Earth accelerates upwards?
Please stop misinforming people. It's not helpful.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2011, 03:36:54 PM »
The general FE consensus is that the Earth is stationary
Of course, this is not the general consensus. Remember the part when the Earth accelerates upwards?
Please stop misinforming people. It's not helpful.

While technically anything I say concerning FET is misinforming people, I have altered my post so as to be less misinforming.
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #7 on: December 03, 2011, 09:12:40 AM »
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

?

Archibald

  • 1082
  • mans reach exceeds his grasp
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #8 on: December 03, 2011, 06:26:10 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.
For whatever reason you allow Clocktower to derail any thread Archibald posts in.

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #9 on: December 03, 2011, 06:47:40 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

?

Archibald

  • 1082
  • mans reach exceeds his grasp
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #10 on: December 03, 2011, 08:20:17 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk
For whatever reason you allow Clocktower to derail any thread Archibald posts in.

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #11 on: December 03, 2011, 09:16:52 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk

So you trust the conspiracy now?  ???
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

?

Archibald

  • 1082
  • mans reach exceeds his grasp
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #12 on: December 03, 2011, 09:27:57 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk

So you trust the conspiracy now?  ???

Not at all.
For whatever reason you allow Clocktower to derail any thread Archibald posts in.

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #13 on: December 03, 2011, 10:24:37 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk

So you trust the conspiracy now?  ???

Not at all.

But all the data we have about Venus comes from rovers and satellites (NASA), telescopes (NASA), and theories about planetary evolution (NASA). Do you really think they're telling us the truth?
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12253
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2011, 03:49:18 AM »
While technically anything I say concerning FET is misinforming people, I have altered my post so as to be less misinforming.
The general FE consensus is that the Earth (and the rest of the Universe) is being accelerated upwards, with the exception of objects on the Earth's surface of course.
No, you haven't. If the Earth is accelerating, how can objects on it (which are obviously being pushed by it) not accelerate? You've made your post even worse. Previously it was just false - now it's self-contradictory.

Think of it a a person inside the elevator. What you said is that the elevator is going up, but the person isn't. This is quite silly.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2011, 03:51:12 AM by PizzaPlanet »
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2011, 07:14:04 AM »
While technically anything I say concerning FET is misinforming people, I have altered my post so as to be less misinforming.
The general FE consensus is that the Earth (and the rest of the Universe) is being accelerated upwards, with the exception of objects on the Earth's surface of course.
No, you haven't. If the Earth is accelerating, how can objects on it (which are obviously being pushed by it) not accelerate? You've made your post even worse. Previously it was just false - now it's self-contradictory.

Think of it a a person inside the elevator. What you said is that the elevator is going up, but the person isn't. This is quite silly.

If everything on the Earth's surface was being accelerated by the UA, then stuff would start floating away, as there'd be no net acceleration between objects and the Earth. Being accelerated by the Earth =/= being accelerated by the UA. Your elevator example makes no sense, why should the UA affect the Earth but not things on its surface?
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2011, 09:27:42 AM »
While technically anything I say concerning FET is misinforming people, I have altered my post so as to be less misinforming.
The general FE consensus is that the Earth (and the rest of the Universe) is being accelerated upwards, with the exception of objects on the Earth's surface of course.
No, you haven't. If the Earth is accelerating, how can objects on it (which are obviously being pushed by it) not accelerate? You've made your post even worse. Previously it was just false - now it's self-contradictory.

Think of it a a person inside the elevator. What you said is that the elevator is going up, but the person isn't. This is quite silly.

If everything on the Earth's surface was being accelerated by the UA, then stuff would start floating away, as there'd be no net acceleration between objects and the Earth. Being accelerated by the Earth =/= being accelerated by the UA. Your elevator example makes no sense, why should the UA affect the Earth but not things on its surface?

This is correct, if everything in the universe was being equally accelerated by an unknown force, relatively speaking nothing would be accelerated at all.

?

Archibald

  • 1082
  • mans reach exceeds his grasp
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2011, 12:15:30 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk

So you trust the conspiracy now?  ???

Not at all.

But all the data we have about Venus comes from rovers and satellites (NASA), telescopes (NASA), and theories about planetary evolution (NASA). Do you really think they're telling us the truth?

No, all the data you trust comes from your  list of sources and scientific apparatuses.  All the information we have about this earth and the surrounding celestial entities does not derive from just NASA/WSC and  other scientific organisations and communties.  Its simply the only information you and others will except.  My information regarding Venus and its past water world life supporting atmosphere comes from a close friend and fellow zetetic from Saudi Arabia.
For whatever reason you allow Clocktower to derail any thread Archibald posts in.

*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6767
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2011, 06:48:19 PM »
While technically anything I say concerning FET is misinforming people, I have altered my post so as to be less misinforming.
The general FE consensus is that the Earth (and the rest of the Universe) is being accelerated upwards, with the exception of objects on the Earth's surface of course.
No, you haven't. If the Earth is accelerating, how can objects on it (which are obviously being pushed by it) not accelerate? You've made your post even worse. Previously it was just false - now it's self-contradictory.

Think of it a a person inside the elevator. What you said is that the elevator is going up, but the person isn't. This is quite silly.

If everything on the Earth's surface was being accelerated by the UA, then stuff would start floating away, as there'd be no net acceleration between objects and the Earth. Being accelerated by the Earth =/= being accelerated by the UA. Your elevator example makes no sense, why should the UA affect the Earth but not things on its surface?

This is correct, if everything in the universe was being equally accelerated by an unknown force, relatively speaking nothing would be accelerated at all.

No, it's not. The UA acts like a wind, in both AWT and DET. I have some delicious copypasta for you, just let me find it.

EDIT: Here you go-


Think of it like this:

You are standing behind a wall. There is a raging wind pressing against this wall on the other side. Do you feel this wind? No, because the wall is protecting you from it. But let's say that the wind becomes so strong that it makes the wall start to move. The wall presses against you and starts to move you. Now, for argument's sake, let's say the wind is pushing the wall directly upwards at ~9.81 m/s/s, and you are standing on it. This is how you should think of UA.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2011, 06:50:28 PM by Tausami »

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2011, 07:22:31 PM »
While technically anything I say concerning FET is misinforming people, I have altered my post so as to be less misinforming.
The general FE consensus is that the Earth (and the rest of the Universe) is being accelerated upwards, with the exception of objects on the Earth's surface of course.
No, you haven't. If the Earth is accelerating, how can objects on it (which are obviously being pushed by it) not accelerate? You've made your post even worse. Previously it was just false - now it's self-contradictory.

Think of it a a person inside the elevator. What you said is that the elevator is going up, but the person isn't. This is quite silly.

If everything on the Earth's surface was being accelerated by the UA, then stuff would start floating away, as there'd be no net acceleration between objects and the Earth. Being accelerated by the Earth =/= being accelerated by the UA. Your elevator example makes no sense, why should the UA affect the Earth but not things on its surface?

This is correct, if everything in the universe was being equally accelerated by an unknown force, relatively speaking nothing would be accelerated at all.

No, it's not. The UA acts like a wind, in both AWT and DET. I have some delicious copypasta for you, just let me find it.

EDIT: Here you go-


Think of it like this:

You are standing behind a wall. There is a raging wind pressing against this wall on the other side. Do you feel this wind? No, because the wall is protecting you from it. But let's say that the wind becomes so strong that it makes the wall start to move. The wall presses against you and starts to move you. Now, for argument's sake, let's say the wind is pushing the wall directly upwards at ~9.81 m/s/s, and you are standing on it. This is how you should think of UA.

How is the wind roaring through the wall and accelerating the sun, moon and other celestial bodies?

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2011, 08:49:45 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk

So you trust the conspiracy now?  ???

Not at all.

But all the data we have about Venus comes from rovers and satellites (NASA), telescopes (NASA), and theories about planetary evolution (NASA). Do you really think they're telling us the truth?

No, all the data you trust comes from your  list of sources and scientific apparatuses.  All the information we have about this earth and the surrounding celestial entities does not derive from just NASA/WSC and  other scientific organisations and communties.  Its simply the only information you and others will except.  My information regarding Venus and its past water world life supporting atmosphere comes from a close friend and fellow zetetic from Saudi Arabia.

Where did he get his information? Stare into the sky until the thought occurred to him did he?

No, I think its much more likely that he got his information from NASA or some other space agency (some friend, right?).
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

?

Archibald

  • 1082
  • mans reach exceeds his grasp
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2011, 09:16:27 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk

So you trust the conspiracy now?  ???

Not at all.

But all the data we have about Venus comes from rovers and satellites (NASA), telescopes (NASA), and theories about planetary evolution (NASA). Do you really think they're telling us the truth?

No, all the data you trust comes from your  list of sources and scientific apparatuses.  All the information we have about this earth and the surrounding celestial entities does not derive from just NASA/WSC and  other scientific organisations and communties.  Its simply the only information you and others will except.  My information regarding Venus and its past water world life supporting atmosphere comes from a close friend and fellow zetetic from Saudi Arabia.

Where did he get his information? Stare into the sky until the thought occurred to him did he?

No, I think its much more likely that he got his information from NASA or some other space agency (some friend, right?).


He is a bee keeper from Saudi Arabia and he is the first person I had ever heard mention bioluminescent life on the moon.  He has actually conducted experiments with the bees he keeps and documented great differences in drone productivity at different variances of exposure to moonlight.  As for his  findings of Venus, it is actually documented in ancient arab and beduoine proverbs and was not derived from any developed scientific organisation.
For whatever reason you allow Clocktower to derail any thread Archibald posts in.

Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2011, 09:41:20 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk

So you trust the conspiracy now?  ???

Not at all.

But all the data we have about Venus comes from rovers and satellites (NASA), telescopes (NASA), and theories about planetary evolution (NASA). Do you really think they're telling us the truth?

No, all the data you trust comes from your  list of sources and scientific apparatuses.  All the information we have about this earth and the surrounding celestial entities does not derive from just NASA/WSC and  other scientific organisations and communties.  Its simply the only information you and others will except.  My information regarding Venus and its past water world life supporting atmosphere comes from a close friend and fellow zetetic from Saudi Arabia.

Where did he get his information? Stare into the sky until the thought occurred to him did he?

No, I think its much more likely that he got his information from NASA or some other space agency (some friend, right?).


He is a bee keeper from Saudi Arabia and he is the first person I had ever heard mention bioluminescent life on the moon.  He has actually conducted experiments with the bees he keeps and documented great differences in drone productivity at different variances of exposure to moonlight.  As for his  findings of Venus, it is actually documented in ancient arab and beduoine proverbs and was not derived from any developed scientific organisation.

I must be doing it wrong, my bees are very unhelpful when I asked them about life on the moon. 

Aside from me having lazy bees, how do ancient Arab and Bedouin proverbs give evidence that life once existed on Venus?
You, sir, can't comprehend the idea of bottoms.

?

Archibald

  • 1082
  • mans reach exceeds his grasp
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2011, 09:49:58 PM »
No, it is becoming general consensus that venus once supported life and was a water world planet.

Evidence?

Sloth.  Its all over google,  But for the lazy, theres an articla about it here www.telegraph.co.uk

So you trust the conspiracy now?  ???

Not at all.

But all the data we have about Venus comes from rovers and satellites (NASA), telescopes (NASA), and theories about planetary evolution (NASA). Do you really think they're telling us the truth?

No, all the data you trust comes from your  list of sources and scientific apparatuses.  All the information we have about this earth and the surrounding celestial entities does not derive from just NASA/WSC and  other scientific organisations and communties.  Its simply the only information you and others will except.  My information regarding Venus and its past water world life supporting atmosphere comes from a close friend and fellow zetetic from Saudi Arabia.

Where did he get his information? Stare into the sky until the thought occurred to him did he?

No, I think its much more likely that he got his information from NASA or some other space agency (some friend, right?).


He is a bee keeper from Saudi Arabia and he is the first person I had ever heard mention bioluminescent life on the moon.  He has actually conducted experiments with the bees he keeps and documented great differences in drone productivity at different variances of exposure to moonlight.  As for his  findings of Venus, it is actually documented in ancient arab and beduoine proverbs and was not derived from any developed scientific organisation.

I must be doing it wrong, my bees are very unhelpful when I asked them about life on the moon. 

Aside from me having lazy bees, how do ancient Arab and Bedouin proverbs give evidence that life once existed on Venus?


I am an amature  bee keeper myself, how many apiaries do you have?  Also, the bees did not tell him anything except that moonlight decreases drone productivity.  The proverbs have not proven life once existed on venus, neither has NASA or any other space agency.
For whatever reason you allow Clocktower to derail any thread Archibald posts in.

?

OrbisNonSufficit

  • 3124
  • I love Gasoline.
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #24 on: December 05, 2011, 03:35:31 PM »
While technically anything I say concerning FET is misinforming people, I have altered my post so as to be less misinforming.
The general FE consensus is that the Earth (and the rest of the Universe) is being accelerated upwards, with the exception of objects on the Earth's surface of course.
No, you haven't. If the Earth is accelerating, how can objects on it (which are obviously being pushed by it) not accelerate? You've made your post even worse. Previously it was just false - now it's self-contradictory.

Think of it a a person inside the elevator. What you said is that the elevator is going up, but the person isn't. This is quite silly.

If everything on the Earth's surface was being accelerated by the UA, then stuff would start floating away, as there'd be no net acceleration between objects and the Earth. Being accelerated by the Earth =/= being accelerated by the UA. Your elevator example makes no sense, why should the UA affect the Earth but not things on its surface?

This is correct, if everything in the universe was being equally accelerated by an unknown force, relatively speaking nothing would be accelerated at all.

No, it's not. The UA acts like a wind, in both AWT and DET. I have some delicious copypasta for you, just let me find it.

EDIT: Here you go-


Think of it like this:

You are standing behind a wall. There is a raging wind pressing against this wall on the other side. Do you feel this wind? No, because the wall is protecting you from it. But let's say that the wind becomes so strong that it makes the wall start to move. The wall presses against you and starts to move you. Now, for argument's sake, let's say the wind is pushing the wall directly upwards at ~9.81 m/s/s, and you are standing on it. This is how you should think of UA.

This makes space travel possible, you just have to rocket yourself to the point where you are no longer shielded by the earth, which if you did near the ice wall it would be a piece of cake, which would then mean that travel to the moon would be down right easy as its only 3100 miles away.

?

Silverdane

  • 346
  • Deutschland Double Heil!! @_@//
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2011, 06:07:23 PM »
I still canít believe it, those remains theory and no dense evidence from science. How itíll be able to rotate on its axis and revolve around the sun without loosing on the orbit. These theories really confused yet got my curiosity.

You are such Genius Work of Art, Wise One !!

It's not like when you throw a frisbee it just rotates on itself, whilst enforcing a stability around it's center, despite being a disc, and spinning much faster than the flat earth should spin, if it did.

Except it doesn't. Stability is much easier to Achieve.

Ever considered that the air itself forces the Earth to be stable? And whenever it falls out of balance, some volcano errupts, or hurricane happens, to balance out it's general axis of uninclination and unrotation?

It's not like when that rotating discus falls into water, it just stays there, perfectly flat, or something. No, it surely must become unbalanced, as if it were to be possessed by ..... Unclean Spirits ...

Whereas pertaining to your Glorious Geniusness, Oh Genie of the Lamp Post .... throwing a ball creates perfect balance and stability. Except as soon as it hits an obstacle it bounces with incredible inertia, accelerating fast enough in opposite ways, enough to throw you into the middle of the Pacific.

Which I assume never happens, so the earth is clearly stable like a frisbee is, and not unstable and violent like a basketball.

Why do you think the imaginary topic of Flying Saucers, doesn't have any Death Star like ships? Because saucers are much more stable, theoretically.

Even at a playground, when crazy kids wish to achieve Anorexy and vomit their lunches all over the other kids watching them spin, they latch unto the bars of a spinning carousel like thingie.

If they were to jump into a rubber chamber and roll down the hill they would lose all balance of their rolling direction.

Unlike the circular wheels on a bike, that needs to be more flat than "rounded" to achieve extra fluffy circular motions.

So as far as this paralel universe is concerned ... Physics here just don't agree with you. Mechanics wise.
We shall have a magnificent orgy garden party & you're not invited

?

Silverdane

  • 346
  • Deutschland Double Heil!! @_@//
Re: Reason why earth is flat
« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2011, 06:14:43 PM »
I still canít believe it, those remains theory and no dense evidence from science. How itíll be able to rotate on its axis and revolve around the sun without loosing on the orbit. These theories really confused yet got my curiosity.

The general FE consensus is that the Earth (and the rest of the Universe) is being accelerated upwards, with the exception of objects on the Earth's surface of course. The celestial bodies then execute their movements around the Earth so as to create the illusion of a round Earth.

You don't get Geocentrism .... do you? Geocentrism is the belief that the Earth is the main world in the noticeable plane of things here. Not it's destination which requires upwards levitation.

Have you considered it's an opposing force like downward winds, that force large ammounts of air down to the surface, to force most things to remain land born?

That same air falling from above at a more or less constant speed, is recycled, as it hits the earth, channels into air streams and currents, creating large hurricanes, tornadoes, air erosion, storms, circulation of water and other gases through nature. Air bubbles of many gases dissolving in the sea, and depositing on the sea bed's mud, tends to agree with this.

It's the air pushing down, not the earth running up. If it did "run up", shouldn't it's own density create Deceleration, because it opposes the most resistance to movement, since it's largest face is being force up against the wind mass?

Not to mention the Flat Earth itself would crack and break up into smaller islands if it truly had a constant speed of rushing up against the sky above. Which this kind of resistance.

I don't know if you're wrong, but it'd rather go with air falling down, then rising up in warm currents, for example, when it reaches the sea, or volcanoes, or the Ecuator. Because this would keep the Flat Earth stable, and slowly eroding at the surface, instead of breaking it apart all together, due to having extreme velocity, instead of stability.

No offence.
We shall have a magnificent orgy garden party & you're not invited