Giving a flat projection of a round Earth map does not constitute a flat Earth map.
This is something you have yet to elaborate on. You see, there is only one Earth. Regardless of its shape, we're talking about the same celestial body. Saying that a map is a map of one model but not the other is, to put it lightly, moronic. That is, of course, unless you have a valid reason to think that we live on different planets/celestial bodies of your favourite kind and flavour, in which case I'm very interested to hear about your ideas.
Since you will not or cannot understand I will explain it to you. If you take a globe (i.e. a
round Earth) and project it onto a 2 dimensional map, you will have distortions that come from a 3D object (sphere) being represented by a 2D object (map). If the Earth were actually flat, then there would be no distortions as you would be going from a 2D object (flat Earth) to another 2D object (map). A map of a round Earth would be quite different than a map of a flat Earth. The only condition that is placed on your map is that is matches known distances and preserved known areas. Doing so with no distortions would be evidence for a flat Earth, if it can only be done with distortions, it would be evidence for a non-flat (i.e.
round) Earth.
Likewise from your post above, I would like to see how a spherical object is identical to a flat object, as you seem to believe. To put it lightly, the belief that a flat Earth would be identical to round Earth is moronic.