And.... what experiment?
The Michelson–Morley experiment, of course. How did you manage to reference it in your post without knowing what it is?
I didn't reference it, you did. I just asked what you were talking about.
And, it seems to me that there wasn't really much ambiguity at all. Remember, this is a website. If you throw out an argument, all I have to do is open a new tab to fact-check you. And... I will. So for instance, when Tom Bishop tries to imply that Stephen Hawking is a religious person, debunking that claim is a fairly simple task.
Either way, the validity of MMX has absolutely zero bearing on the subject at hand. Let's not get off-subject. You're right, science is a curious thing. But, not in this case. The world is round. It was proven as such centuries ago, and is one of the simplest truths in the history of man. The only thing curious about it is the fact that in the 21st century, there are those who doubt it.
You bringing up MMX in order to prove the validity of doubt in RE Theory is like saying, "you can't prove that 2+2=4 because a FEW people believe that a subatomic particle experiment in Switzerland MAY have disproven Einstein's theory of Relativity."