Tides?

  • 50 Replies
  • 8134 Views
*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 16759
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Tides?
« Reply #30 on: October 28, 2011, 04:25:24 PM »
No such thing as the submoon has ever been dicovered.
True, discover was not the appropriate word.  The effect of it, however, has been measured.
Quantum Ab Hoc

Re: Tides?
« Reply #31 on: October 28, 2011, 04:26:58 PM »
By whom? Where? How?
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 16759
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Tides?
« Reply #32 on: October 28, 2011, 04:33:12 PM »
By whom? Where? How?
Anyone, anywhere, with an accelerometer.
Quantum Ab Hoc

Re: Tides?
« Reply #33 on: October 28, 2011, 04:34:44 PM »
Wrong!

You've better find give references or evidences if you want to be believed.
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 16759
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Tides?
« Reply #34 on: October 28, 2011, 04:41:16 PM »
Wrong!

You've better find give references or evidences if you want to be believed.
I don't want to be believed, per se.  I am doing this solely for your benefit, of which I care little for.  But I'm a nice guy.

If you want to see this simple measure with an accelerometer when the moon isn't overhead and when it is (obviously with more care than I wrote that out.) 
Quantum Ab Hoc

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 41868
Re: Tides?
« Reply #35 on: October 28, 2011, 07:43:54 PM »
I've never ever seen litterature on this!

Read ENaG.
The submoon is not in ENaG.
See, the submoon is such a silly idea that even Rowbotham didn't fall for it.
Rowbotham would have no need for a submoon as it doesn't help support his biblical narrative.  However, that doesn't matter because Rowbotham wasn't even alive when the submoon was discovered.
Well, since Rowbotham was able to explain the tides quite nicely without the need for a submoon, it seems that the "discovery" of the submoon might be somewhat suspect.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 16759
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Tides?
« Reply #36 on: October 28, 2011, 08:09:48 PM »
Its not just about tides, you can actually measure the effect of the submoon.  Easily.
Quantum Ab Hoc

Re: Tides?
« Reply #37 on: October 29, 2011, 03:39:59 AM »
Tides is one of the most-described phenomenon, I've never seen nowhere that a shmuckmoon could fit into that theory.

I'll think I'll just use the gigantic amount of data you can find on tides, common good sense and not use an accelerometer.
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 16759
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Tides?
« Reply #38 on: October 29, 2011, 09:28:23 AM »
Tides is one of the most-described phenomenon, I've never seen nowhere that a shmuckmoon could fit into that theory.

I'll think I'll just use the gigantic amount of data you can find on tides, common good sense and not use an accelerometer.
Is is also a valid alternative.  If you can't see the obvious place it would hold, then you clearly don't have an intimate understanding of the simple math involved.  You can gain one as I will be describing it in my upcoming book.
Quantum Ab Hoc

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Tides?
« Reply #39 on: October 29, 2011, 09:55:42 AM »
Its not just about tides, you can actually measure the effect of the submoon.  Easily.

The trouble is in actually showing that it is the effect of the submoon.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 16759
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Tides?
« Reply #40 on: October 29, 2011, 10:29:06 AM »
Well, yes.  The same could be said of the moon and tides in RE.  All that matters is that theres a model that fits tidal predictions for both.  Trying to trace gravitons back to their source is a bit silly.
Quantum Ab Hoc

Re: Tides?
« Reply #41 on: November 01, 2011, 06:15:24 AM »
There's a model for tides, incliding the Moon, it works.

The model with a sub or antimoon doesn't really exist, and this object has never been observed.
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.

Re: Tides?
« Reply #42 on: November 12, 2011, 12:33:44 PM »
If you want FET to be a theory (which isn't at the moment), you could start by giving a physical model of your tides system with 2 moons (and some math).
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11686
Re: Tides?
« Reply #43 on: November 14, 2011, 07:17:06 AM »
There's a model for tides, incliding the Moon, it works.

The model with a sub or antimoon doesn't really exist, and this object has never been observed.
Hey EZ, how does the moon cause 2 high tides at one time upon the earth. Each high tide on the opposite side of the earth.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

Re: Tides?
« Reply #44 on: November 14, 2011, 07:38:11 AM »
If you have another theory that the common accepted one, be my guest.
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 41868
Re: Tides?
« Reply #45 on: November 14, 2011, 08:11:40 AM »
There's a model for tides, incliding the Moon, it works.

The model with a sub or antimoon doesn't really exist, and this object has never been observed.
Hey EZ, how does the moon cause 2 high tides at one time upon the earth. Each high tide on the opposite side of the earth.

Maybe this will help:
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11686
Re: Tides?
« Reply #46 on: November 14, 2011, 11:33:23 AM »
That youtube video is good propaganda, but it makes no sense if you think about for a little while. I could believe 1 high tide a day was due to moon gravity. But not 2 tides on opposite sides of the earth. I used to believe this type of propaganda, however it doesn't make sense. I don't believe it.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

Re: Tides?
« Reply #47 on: November 14, 2011, 11:37:27 AM »
Its a simple explaination. If you want a more scientific one, go to a library and consult some books. You'll be amazed how good and scientific the demonstrations are.

If you don't believe it, you've better come up with a damm good alternate theory.
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11686
Re: Tides?
« Reply #48 on: November 15, 2011, 12:53:15 PM »
Its a simple explaination. If you want a more scientific one, go to a library and consult some books. You'll be amazed how good and scientific the demonstrations are.

If you don't believe it, you've better come up with a damm good alternate theory.
I don't know the cause of tide, clearly the moon pulling on the earth is not the cause.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 41868
Re: Tides?
« Reply #49 on: November 15, 2011, 02:30:54 PM »
Its a simple explaination. If you want a more scientific one, go to a library and consult some books. You'll be amazed how good and scientific the demonstrations are.

If you don't believe it, you've better come up with a damm good alternate theory.
I don't know the cause of tide, clearly the moon pulling on the earth is not the cause.
Although correlation does not necessarily imply causation, there is an undeniable correlation between the moon, sun and the tides that shouldn't be dismissed lightly.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Tides?
« Reply #50 on: November 15, 2011, 02:57:01 PM »
I don't know the cause of tide, clearly the moon pulling on the earth is not the cause.

If you don't know, don't say wrong things then.
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.