« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Underside of the Earth

  • 19 Replies
  • 4772 Views
?

AlbertHall

  • 16
  • The Earth is Flat, so RE's get over it.
Underside of the Earth
« on: October 24, 2011, 11:48:36 PM »
I believe in flat Earth, and I just wanted to ask a simple question, what do you think is on the other face of Earth, and theoretically, do you think we could dig to the other side?   
Logged
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17990
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2011, 09:19:48 AM »
Digging to the other side would be as problematic as digging through a round earth.

As far as on the other side, it has been suggested that there is possible a submoon and heavens below the earth.
Logged
So long and thanks for all the fish
?

EmperorZhark

  • 2229
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2011, 11:47:37 AM »
How thick would be a FE?
Logged
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.
*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2011, 11:55:36 AM »
If the earth is a gravitating infinite plain as John Davis suggests, the depth must be a minimum of 9000 km.
If otherwise, it is fairly well unknowable, is it not?
Logged
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."
?

EmperorZhark

  • 2229
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2011, 11:57:42 AM »
I don't know. FE theory is so incomplete.
Logged
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.
*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6767
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2011, 12:28:34 PM »
Quote from: EmperorZhark on October 25, 2011, 11:57:42 AM
I don't know. FE theory is so incomplete.

What's at the center of the round Earth? RE theory is so incomplete.
Logged
?

EmperorZhark

  • 2229
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2011, 12:48:55 PM »
No one says the contrary.

What's inside FE?
What's below FE?
Is FE finite or not?
etc
(how much incomplete can you be)
Logged
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.
?

Thork

Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2011, 12:59:08 PM »
Quote from: EmperorZhark on October 25, 2011, 12:48:55 PM
No one says the contrary.

What's inside FE? rock
What's below FE? space
Is FE finite or not? All those that matter apart from John Davis say finite.
etc
(how much incomplete can you be) You knew the answers to all of those.
O0
Logged
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17990
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2011, 01:47:05 PM »
Quote from: Thork on October 25, 2011, 12:59:08 PM
Quote from: EmperorZhark on October 25, 2011, 12:48:55 PM
No one says the contrary.

What's inside FE? rock
What's below FE? space
Is FE finite or not? All those that matter apart from John Davis say finite.
etc
(how much incomplete can you be) You knew the answers to all of those.
O0
I am hardly the only one that believes in an infinite plane.
Logged
So long and thanks for all the fish
*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6767
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2011, 02:16:47 PM »
Quote from: EmperorZhark on October 25, 2011, 12:48:55 PM
No one says the contrary.

What's inside FE?
What's below FE?
Is FE finite or not?
etc
(how much incomplete can you be)

What's inside RE?
Logged
*

rooster

  • 5669
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2011, 02:25:09 PM »
Quote from: Tausami on October 25, 2011, 02:16:47 PM
Quote from: EmperorZhark on October 25, 2011, 12:48:55 PM
No one says the contrary.

What's inside FE?
What's below FE?
Is FE finite or not?
etc
(how much incomplete can you be)

What's inside RE?

The study of seismology tells us this much:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_the_Earth

What does seismology tell us of a FE?
Logged
?

AlbertHall

  • 16
  • The Earth is Flat, so RE's get over it.
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2011, 02:28:55 PM »
Quote from: EmperorZhark on October 25, 2011, 12:48:55 PM
No one says the contrary.

What's inside FE?
What's below FE?
Is FE finite or not?
etc
(how much incomplete can you be)

As a scientist, I believe in what the RE's say about the centre of their round Earth, magma and liquefied copper, nickel ect. As for below Earth, know one can be sure exactly ( the Hindus believe that it's on the back of two elephants on the back of a "universal turtle"), and for if it being infinite is like saying the universe is infinite, it can't happen in any relativity.
Logged
?

Thork

Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2011, 02:58:49 PM »
Quote from: AlbertHall on October 25, 2011, 02:28:55 PM
As a scientist [argumentum ad verecundiam], I believe [doesn't sound very scientific] in what the RE's say about the centre of their round Earth, magma and liquefied copper, nickel ect. As for below Earth, know one can be sure exactly ( the Hindus believe that it's on the back of two elephants [Incorrect, please recount the amount of elephants] on the back of a "universal turtle"), and for if it being infinite is like saying the universe is infinite, it can't happen in any relativity. [citation needed]
Logged
?

iwanttobelieve

  • 5442
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2011, 04:02:40 PM »
my best guess is 3000 Miles, there is a special reason for our distance to the sun, I would think this same special distance may be the thickness of our disc.
Logged
?

AlbertHall

  • 16
  • The Earth is Flat, so RE's get over it.
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2011, 10:19:29 PM »
Quote from: Thork on October 25, 2011, 02:58:49 PM
Quote from: AlbertHall on October 25, 2011, 02:28:55 PM
As a scientist [argumentum ad verecundiam], I believe [doesn't sound very scientific] in what the RE's say about the centre of their round Earth, magma and liquefied copper, nickel ect. As for below Earth, know one can be sure exactly ( the Hindus believe that it's on the back of two elephants [Incorrect, please recount the amount of elephants] on the back of a "universal turtle"), and for if it being infinite is like saying the universe is infinite, it can't happen in any relativity. [citation needed]

Ok, so I did lie about being a scientist, I'm a student being trying to get a degree to become a scientist, but I hope you can see where i'm getting at.
Logged
?

AlbertHall

  • 16
  • The Earth is Flat, so RE's get over it.
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2011, 10:28:22 PM »
Quote from: iwanttobelieve on October 25, 2011, 04:02:40 PM
my best guess is 3000 Miles, there is a special reason for our distance to the sun, I would think this same special distance may be the thickness of our disc.

My best bet would be up to 20000 KM, as the Kola super-deep Borehole is 12 KM into the crust, and there has to be magma and other liquefied stones and such to produce the volcanoes we have.
Logged
?

Thork

Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2011, 09:34:17 AM »
Quote from: AlbertHall on October 25, 2011, 10:19:29 PM
Ok, so I did lie about being a scientist,
You admitted it. This makes you one of my top 5 favourite round earthers ever. The amount of lying that goes on in this forum from round earthers is ridiculous. "I'm a surveyor", "I flew in a Mig-25", "I am an Antarctic researcher", "I measured the sun's angles", "I am Lance Armstrong. I mean Neil".

I don't understand why, when round earthers have all the advantages in a debate, that they feel they have to lie as well? Are they just that bad at debating?
Logged
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17990
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #17 on: October 26, 2011, 12:22:49 PM »
Quote from: Thork on October 26, 2011, 09:34:17 AM
Quote from: AlbertHall on October 25, 2011, 10:19:29 PM
Ok, so I did lie about being a scientist,
You admitted it. This makes you one of my top 5 favourite round earthers ever. The amount of lying that goes on in this forum from round earthers is ridiculous. "I'm a surveyor", "I flew in a Mig-25", "I am an Antarctic researcher", "I measured the sun's angles", "I am Lance Armstrong. I mean Neil".

I don't understand why, when round earthers have all the advantages in a debate, that they feel they have to lie as well? Are they just that bad at debating?
No, they are just wrong.  Its no wonder the lengths the human mind will go to to avoid having its worldview changed.
Logged
So long and thanks for all the fish
*

Tausami

  • Head Editor
  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6767
  • Venerated Official of the High Zetetic Council
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #18 on: October 26, 2011, 01:25:32 PM »
Quote from: rooster on October 25, 2011, 02:25:09 PM
Quote from: Tausami on October 25, 2011, 02:16:47 PM
Quote from: EmperorZhark on October 25, 2011, 12:48:55 PM
No one says the contrary.

What's inside FE?
What's below FE?
Is FE finite or not?
etc
(how much incomplete can you be)

What's inside RE?

The study of seismology tells us this much:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_the_Earth

What does seismology tell us of a FE?

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I read somewhere that there's some scientific disagreement about this. I'll Google it and try to find a link. If I don't post back here, assume I'm wrong.
Logged
?

AlbertHall

  • 16
  • The Earth is Flat, so RE's get over it.
Re: Underside of the Earth
« Reply #19 on: October 26, 2011, 02:18:41 PM »
Quote from: Thork on October 26, 2011, 09:34:17 AM
Quote from: AlbertHall on October 25, 2011, 10:19:29 PM
Ok, so I did lie about being a scientist,
You admitted it. This makes you one of my top 5 favourite round earthers ever. The amount of lying that goes on in this forum from round earthers is ridiculous. "I'm a surveyor", "I flew in a Mig-25", "I am an Antarctic researcher", "I measured the sun's angles", "I am Lance Armstrong. I mean Neil".

I don't understand why, when round earthers have all the advantages in a debate, that they feel they have to lie as well? Are they just that bad at debating?

Ugh, I do not believe in round Earth, I think that it is a stupid idea, I believe in a flat Earth, I never said I believed in round Earth.

Get it.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »