Well I checked enough to see that the distances on a FE map between, let's say Santiago de Chile, Capetown and sydney are utterly ridiculous.
Of course you are absolutely correct. No amount of bleating by the FE trolls can change the fact that they don't have a workable map. Only in RE, do we need a series of projections, neither of which is 100% accurate, to represent the 3D surface two dimensionally. FE, being flat, ought to be easily represented on a two dimensional surface, but no-one has yet been able to derive a 2D model of the Earth that accurately represents the actual distances and shapes of continents.
The reason is that the Earth surface, being 3D, simply cannot be flattened without distortion.
Despite Thork going on about FE having a use for "projections", the fact remains the entire field of map projection only exists as a means of representing the curved surface of the earth in various 2 dimensional formats to suit various needs. IF the earth were not a sphere, map projections would not exist.