imo...what people think of as the universe is but one single cosmos, in
a far more diverse multi-cosmos universe.
Thus they will never find the god/mass particle that unifies the
theories that are currently worked with in one specific cosmos as the
universes processes span a wider range of existence.
Then what do you suppose causes particles to have mass?
fractal infinity which has a depth charge inside a defined space i.e. the "particles defined space" space has no quantified measurement so it (space) can shrink into itself infinitely from any arbitrary point, so the quicker the rate of infinite depth the greater the mass, then again it could be the other way round the slower the rate the greater the mass.
I would say the later makes more sense in context of conventional thinking but there are other ways that the former could be true as well... it depends on the rate of depth charge of the region of cosmic
space that the particle is within...but the point being is its fractal, so one can't find a determinate "particle" or cause that applies indefinitely across the board.
Fractals are self similar in a progressive shrinking or expanding sense, so if you take data from one level and apply it to another level the data has to be mathematically recalibrated to fit the requirements for that level.
The depth charge of a cosmos is not a stable rate it changes according to the environment of the fractal layers above and below (which themselves are not static)...Its always expanding inwards i.e. shrinking into greater depth without loss of resolution, the rate by which it does however, can increase or decrease in accordance with the depth charge of the environment of the fractal level above.
Observers cannot detect this with 5 physical senses as all things shrink in relation to each other.
The indeterminate rate is what accounts for why quantum physicists cannot predict where a particles data will appear in the quantum wave function when measuring.
Every cosmos is like an atom in its function...the same way that an atom acquires electrons from outside and becomes another element i.e. vibrates quicker "gains mass". However the cosmotic environment within does not change, depth charge as stated is experienced relatively however the speed at which inward expansion occurs varies according to how much energy the cosmos has i.e. how fast its
depth charge (Dch) flows.
So regarding particles, it could be said that a particles Dch could be at an equal ratio to the cosmos it exists within...like playing a musical chord of the Octave i.e. C4 and C5...therefore a particle of
this nature will not change in size relative to the cosmos' Dch rate....
But the cosmos is always becoming greater in depth i.e. its volume of space and things, its only the speed at which it is becoming deeper (expanding) which changes.
So not all particles can be entrained to the fundamental frequency of the cosmos as an exact octave integer as tho they are a static size if there are many different kinds, they all must have ratios that are not exact integers of the cosmos Dch, but rather tertiary harmonics such as 1/3, 1/5 ,1/6...of which they themselves can either be quicker or slower than the
fundamental (f) Dch of the cosmos at any given time according to how much energy they have - remember the gain or loss in electrons analogy as determining what element an atom will be. Well if a particle vibrates faster than the f Dch of the cosmos then it will gain mass...if the cosmos speeds up exceeding the particles dch it will lose mass if it continues to vibrate at that same Dch...the cosmos however, as it gains mass (increases Dch) as a whole, distributes the energy to all things equally so the size of things remain the same relatively to each other
(just being concise) whilst the speed that the cosmos vibrates and extends its depth of volume is increased as it will never cease to expand inwardly
(its infinite and perpetual) only the speed changes.
So given this the particles will still remain the same harmonic integer size i.e. 1/3, 1/5, 1/6 in relation to each other regardless the
f Dch of the cosmos...thus as the cosmos changes Dch the
particles all have quantum leaps in Dch equally so it can't be measured, but it still changes the f Dch of all particles.
If a particle is to loose mass its
Dch rate will have to decrease in relation to the cosmos
Dch rate. Now here is the really crazy part...all of what has been said is dependent on the
cosmos having a
f Dch which varies in rate, but if its variable rate comes to a complete stand still as energy is discharged and acquired from the fractal layer above at a equal rate thus creating a stand still in the cosmos
f Dch speed i.e. the quantum leaps cease but the f continues into infinity of space, it is out of resonance with matter/energy of particles within so expansion stops, but its rate is still going infinitely into the measureless depth of space
(its infinite it cant literally stop) at a rate that exceeds the event horizon of the
f Dch so it is absorbed without changing the relative depth of defined cosmic space.
Therefore the particles within will have their
Dch brought to a stand still in relation aswell. But the ratio of difference which determines their individual frequency will show up as an exact value of which they are for them self without the quantum leaps of the cosmos
f Dch.
Now if the
f Dch of the cosmos begins to decrease to a rate slower than the medium
f Dch prior to the stand still event i.e. when the cosmos was receiving and distributing to the fractal layer above in equal ratio, then the particles within will have to start decreasing as well. With this the inverse factor applies... i.e. decrease in depth charge maintains relative mass rather than increase.