Excellent thank you Jack. Some things do not come up as often as you think, so I am wondering how you will answer some questions. Example, retrograde motion. How would you answer that?
Personally I would go to the work of Ptolemy and produce something of his like this and merge it with celestial gears and the Flammarion woodcut.
A search on this site for 'Ptolemy retrograde' however, only yielded 10 posts suggesting that is not the way other FErs go about answering this. It also suggests I have never been asked before.
Age of earth? 4.5 Billion years? Why does FE need any difference? I think most FErs go with the KISS theory when possible. Same for plate tectonics. Does a flat earth mean continents don't move? Why? I fear this one takes us towards colonial dinosaurs, which nice as they are, isn't a wonderful way to start.
I don't have a clue why neutrinos prove earth round or flat. I can't even imagine the question. I would like to see what you say about that, but fear it is not a FAQ. Also I know particle physics isn't my forte. I think that one may be inviting a world of pain as follow up questions are not going to be easy for FErs to answer on that.
Please can you guys involve Tom Bishop as well. He does more in the upper fora than anyone else. He knows what gets asked. He has set answers for all the common stuff.