The Concorde purportedly flew that high.
But, the point that people are trying to make is that you can take a ride in a military vehicle that will go that high.
No, you can take a ride in a military vehicle which will pretend to go that high, and will merely project an image of curvature via the windows.
Do you have anything to back this up, other than it must be true because otherwise it would prove us wrong?
Much like the Higgs boson, it's an unlikelihood promoted by necessity.
This is a conjecture, based on no proof, but it suites your needs and therefore, you will hold onto that belief. How do you project an image onto a canopy that is completely flawless that the people inside will believe beyond any doubt that it is real? How does the pilot fly with this image projected onto the canopy? Did the Concorde fleet have these projectors on every single porthole on every single jet? What about the pilots, were there projectors on their windows as well? Any proof that any of this is anything more than a fairy tale.
1) Because the windows are video screens
2) The planes used for civilian flights are remote controlled
3) No, the pilots have better things to do than look for curvature.
1)Your an idiot if thats a serious post(please tell me your trolling)
2)they could not remote control the Concorde, its too advanced and the tech was not that good in the 80's and 90's
3)the pilots get bored up there when they hit auto pilot, they look out the windows all the time
and military jets would have no reason to make these "video screens"
1) So it can't be remote controlled, but it can be auto piloted? How's that work?
2) Let's pretend this is true, and a pilot notices that he doesn't see any curvature. Which is he going to assume; that there's a massive conspiracy that he just stumbled into, or that there are factors he doesn't know about coming into play? The conspiracy's greatest trick was to convince the world that for the Earth to be any shape other than oblate spheroid is pure insanity.
1)Remote controls means that 100% of the flight is controlled from the ground. This means takeoff and landing. Auto pilot means that once the pilots reached their altitude they set a course for the plane to follow once its in its cruising altitude. We just started using UAV's about 15 years ago and they are much smaller and less complex than the Concorde. on top of that we only have concepts right now of UCAV....but yet we could remote control the Concorde in the 80's? I doubt it..
2)But the pilot would see a curvature
Your going way off point again.
The original point is you can see a curvature in a high enough altitude and its possible to take these flights on military jets from these private companies. and people fly them every day. makes no sense to do that if it was a big cover up.