Will Europeans also lie to us when their GPS (they found a new name, i can't remember now) will work ?
I am European.
I assume you are referring to the
Galileo satellite navigation system.The fact they named it after Galileo tells you all you need to know. It reeks of conspiracy. See other threads on Galileo.
NDBs suck ? Based on what... the fact that we dimanstle them ? I can travel across a state using only one NDB...
VOR, NDBs, what's your point ?
Of course INS can be faked 'easily', but don't you think it includes too much people to be true ?
Yes NDBs suck. Most commercial pilots never use one ever because most autopilots won't track them, so pilots usually put in the supposed location of said beacon into the FMS as a way point, and forget about the actual beacon altogether. You might want to be careful going large distances on one NDB.
However, NDB signals are also affected more by atmospheric conditions, mountainous terrain, coastal refraction and electrical storms, particularly at long range.
Why Lindbergh would consider that the earth is flat ?! Why every pilot who travels across the oceans and continents with no navaids would also consider that ?
Why wouldn't he? You fly. When you are in the air, does the earth look flat to you, or like a giant ball? If you want to answer ball you should see your physician about
metamorphopsia. It is only logical one would plan as one perceives in the early stages of a new navigational science.
As a commercial pilot, if you really believe that earth is flat, have (or will) you ever try to follow a route calculated considering a flat-earth ?
Suppose you fly North East to a location IRL. Are you continually adjusting your heading enroute to your destination and flying a great circle? Or do you just fly in a straight line on one heading, direct the quickest way? If the answer is straight line direct, the earth is flat and you navigated it using a flat earth technique.
As for maps you are in danger of fragmenting your thread. It is a whole other topic.