« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

911 Conspiracy discusion

  • 73 Replies
  • 18392 Views
?

Bugman

  • 33
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #60 on: September 12, 2006, 02:36:49 PM »
I don't think there's anything suspicious about them deciding to perform a controlled demolition on building 7. It would possibly be necessary for safety purposes, and it's only one building.
Logged
*

WisconsinAmmo

  • 147
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #61 on: September 12, 2006, 02:50:59 PM »
Quote from: "cadmium_blimp"
I just have to wonder what kind of damage the impact of the planes caused.  Can a 747 hit a building like the WTC and not even harm the structure itself?

2 weeks before 9/11, all security cameras, and bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the building for a day, the person in charge of security was a brother of geore bush, I don't have the articles that say this on hand, but I've seen reports about it on many sites over.

Quote from: "Bugman"
I don't think there's anything suspicious about them deciding to perform a controlled demolition on building 7. It would possibly be necessary for safety purposes, and it's only one building.


there are people inside the building? what? why would they plan that?
Logged
?

Hamaz

  • 66
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #62 on: September 12, 2006, 02:56:28 PM »
Building 7 was empty of people at the time of demolition BUT that was where security for the whole complex was being run from by Marvin Bush.

hmm not suspicious at all,  as they cant blame Jet fule for the fires the Govt. says the cause of collapse is 'probably because of fires' in spite of Larry Silverstein admiting they pulled it.
Logged
?

Erasmus

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4242
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #63 on: September 12, 2006, 05:31:35 PM »
Quote from: "WisconsinAmmo"
2 weeks before 9/11, all security cameras, and bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the building for a day, the person in charge of security was a brother of geore bush, I don't have the articles that say this on hand, but I've seen reports about it on many sites over.


Quote from: "Hamaz"
Building 7 was empty of people at the time of demolition BUT that was where security for the whole complex was being run from by Marvin Bush.


My understanding is that he ceased being a director of that company a year before the attacks,..
Logged
Why did the chicken cross the Möbius strip?
*

beast

  • 2997
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #64 on: September 22, 2006, 10:00:29 AM »
Don't know if this has been posted in the topic (sorry if it has) but it's essentially a scientific bases site completely rebutting pretty much every single 11/9 conspiracy theory.

Don't know if people will want to believe it or not but it's good to have both sides of the story and I tend to think that these people know what they're talking about.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
Logged
*

Inquisitor Bob

  • 124
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #65 on: September 22, 2006, 11:31:49 AM »
Thank god, there are still some people out there who have'nt sided with those damn leftist Bush haters.
Logged
t's a conspiracy.
?

joffenz

  • The Elder Ones
  • 1272
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #66 on: September 22, 2006, 03:27:42 PM »
Quote from: "Inquisitor Bob"
Thank god, there are still some people out there who have'nt sided with those damn leftist Bush haters.


I'm a leftist Bush hater but I don't think 9/11 was a conspiracy...
Logged
?

irishpeter

  • 141
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #67 on: September 22, 2006, 05:43:46 PM »
me too!! Woo hoo! Social democracy and the Green Party!
Logged
*

beast

  • 2997
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #68 on: September 22, 2006, 05:49:11 PM »
Yeah I would probably have to class myself as a leftist Bush hater too.  Although I don't really think Bush is the problem at all.
Logged
?

cadmium_blimp

  • 1499
  • +0/-0
  • funny, you thought I'd convert, didn't you?
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #69 on: September 22, 2006, 06:48:15 PM »
What is the problem?
Logged

Quote from: Commander Taggart
Never give up, never surrender!
?

Selling 230Q at $460

  • 150
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #70 on: September 22, 2006, 07:11:21 PM »
Lol i swear this is the funniest forum in the world, everyone is SO paranoid.

And Bush is a tosspot, waging war against an entire religion. My prime minister is a knob jockey for following him too. Yes i spelt prime minister without a capital P, because he does not deserve my respect.
I respect that they are figureheads, but the decisions over the past however many years have been made in haste, without decent back up plans and in my case without their full party backing.
TB had to rely on the backing of other parties to have his way. Not to mention to did lie a great deal.
One of the most skilled double talkers we've had in this country for a long time.
Logged
?

cadmium_blimp

  • 1499
  • +0/-0
  • funny, you thought I'd convert, didn't you?
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #71 on: September 22, 2006, 07:30:54 PM »
Did they lie or were they speaking what they believed to be true?  I'm quite sure it was the latter.
Logged

Quote from: Commander Taggart
Never give up, never surrender!
?

Xenoc

911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #72 on: September 22, 2006, 08:15:03 PM »
Quote from: "Selling 230Q at $460"

And Bush is a tosspot, waging war against an entire religion.


Arguably he is waging war with a philosophy, a very brutal one.  That's beside the point.  I'm curious as to what your post is trying to acomplish.
Logged
?

Selling 230Q at $460

  • 150
  • +0/-0
911 Conspiracy discusion
« Reply #73 on: September 23, 2006, 07:41:16 AM »
Quote from: "cadmium_blimp"
Did they lie or were they speaking what they believed to be true?  I'm quite sure it was the latter.


HERE IN BRITAIN WE WERE LIED TO
Ok?
I never supported going to war in the first place because i didn't believe in "weapons of mass destruction" yada yada yada. TB didn't have his party backing, he didn't have the country backing. Those who did believe him were duped, as far as i am aware being the leader of the country you have to lead your people to the best possible situations, not lead your people against their wishes because you're being shafted by another country under the pretence of a "special" relationship.

And Xenoc.
My post is quite clearly a demonstration of my views in respect to the Bush and Blair, if that is not ok with you then you can quite frankly suck a fuck.
This is a forum, i am entitled to express my views as are you.
As for Bush and his waging a war on philosophy, coming from an evangelical bible basher that he is that's rather hypocritical don't you think?
The man's "waging war on tyranny" has and always will be a farce, he wants control of as much middle eastern oil as he can get his grubby mitts on. This is about power, nothing more. He can dress it up under as much religious dogma as he likes but the fact is his war on terror has had reprocussions globaly, and has destabalised an entire region.
I mean how fucking laughable is this, waging a war on an ENTIRE religion. Puuuuuurlease :roll: It's so funny!!
Well done bush, you two bit monkey.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »