Networking Restrictions

  • 39 Replies
  • 7462 Views
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #30 on: May 14, 2011, 06:27:02 AM »
I thought the FEers would be answering that question.
Now this debate has become somewhat convoluted :/

*

Skeleton

  • 956
  • Frankly, I have better things to do with my time.
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #31 on: May 19, 2011, 04:47:21 PM »

The common answer you'll receive is that its due to the electromagnetic accelerator 

Which has been disproved. Just because lots of people ignore the disproof doesnt mean it hasnt.
If the ultimate objective is to kill Skeleton, we should just do that next.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18025
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #32 on: May 19, 2011, 04:48:49 PM »

The common answer you'll receive is that its due to the electromagnetic accelerator 

Which has been disproved. Just because lots of people ignore the disproof doesnt mean it hasnt.

Who disproved it?

*

Skeleton

  • 956
  • Frankly, I have better things to do with my time.
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #33 on: May 19, 2011, 04:55:26 PM »

The common answer you'll receive is that its due to the electromagnetic accelerator 

Which has been disproved. Just because lots of people ignore the disproof doesnt mean it hasnt.

Who disproved it?

Thermal Detonator I believe, by pointing out that the predicted bent light phenomenon of variable angular distances between stars as they approach and recede from the horizon does not happen.
If the ultimate objective is to kill Skeleton, we should just do that next.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 43154
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #34 on: May 19, 2011, 05:21:22 PM »

The common answer you'll receive is that its due to the electromagnetic accelerator 

Which has been disproved. Just because lots of people ignore the disproof doesnt mean it hasnt.

Who disproved it?

Umm...  Rowbotham at the Bedford Levels?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12260
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #35 on: May 20, 2011, 01:42:23 AM »
Who disproved it?

Umm...  Rowbotham at the Bedford Levels?
If we accept Rowbotham's experiment, the Earth is already flat and there's no need for further debate.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17990
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #36 on: May 20, 2011, 01:49:30 AM »
Who disproved it?

Umm...  Rowbotham at the Bedford Levels?
If we accept Rowbotham's experiment, the Earth is already flat and there's no need for further debate.
Or at least, if we accept Rowbotham's experiment the earth can't be round as described by globularist work.

So long and thanks for all the fish

?

Crustinator

  • 7813
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #37 on: May 20, 2011, 11:18:02 AM »
First, I believe the earth is finite. Second, I discount the notions of a secret army defending the outer rim -- what would be the need?

This has been well documented. If people went to the edge of teh earth then they would see the earth is flat. the Conspiracy must work relentlessly to stop people seeing the edge.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18025
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #38 on: May 20, 2011, 01:08:13 PM »

The common answer you'll receive is that its due to the electromagnetic accelerator 

Which has been disproved. Just because lots of people ignore the disproof doesnt mean it hasnt.

Who disproved it?

Umm...  Rowbotham at the Bedford Levels?

My mistake. I read it as "universal accelerator."

I do not support the idea of an "electromagnetic accelerator."

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 43154
Re: Networking Restrictions
« Reply #39 on: May 20, 2011, 01:25:59 PM »
Who disproved it?

Umm...  Rowbotham at the Bedford Levels?
If we accept Rowbotham's experiment, the Earth is already flat and there's no need for further debate.
Except to clarify the inconsistencies that are not resolved by Rowbotham's experiment, of course.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.