Lack of trust.

Yes, FET should be part of the standard cirriculum.

If FET should be part of the standard curriculum, then there should actually be a standard in the FET to teach. It should also have evidence. It would take a lot of work before FET would even be considered to be taught in schools.

Quote from: gotham on March 30, 2011, 06:03:23 PM

Yes, FET should be part of the standard cirriculum.

If FET should be part of the standard curriculum, then there should actually be a standard in the FET to teach. It should also have evidence. It would take a lot of work before FET would even be considered to be taught in schools.

This is true because they really only teach science in science classes.

Quote from: sillyrob on March 30, 2011, 06:31:06 PM

Quote from: gotham on March 30, 2011, 06:03:23 PM

Yes, FET should be part of the standard cirriculum.

If FET should be part of the standard curriculum, then there should actually be a standard in the FET to teach. It should also have evidence. It would take a lot of work before FET would even be considered to be taught in schools.

This is true because they really only teach science in science classes.

If young minds are exposed to science only within the context of the scientific method then they are missing out on Zeteticism, for example.  I can not recall if that word was written or even spoken of when I was in school.

Yes, FET should be part of the standard cirriculum.

How can FET be a part of any curriculum when there is no coherent FE model to teach?

Quote from: lagnaf on March 30, 2011, 06:41:11 PM

Quote from: sillyrob on March 30, 2011, 06:31:06 PM

Quote from: gotham on March 30, 2011, 06:03:23 PM

Yes, FET should be part of the standard cirriculum.

If FET should be part of the standard curriculum, then there should actually be a standard in the FET to teach. It should also have evidence. It would take a lot of work before FET would even be considered to be taught in schools.

This is true because they really only teach science in science classes.

If young minds are exposed to science only within the context of the scientific method then they are missing out on Zeteticism, for example.  I can not recall if that word was written or even spoken of when I was in school.

When Zeteticism actually produces something, then we can talk.

Quote from: gotham on March 30, 2011, 06:03:23 PM

Yes, FET should be part of the standard cirriculum.

How can FET be a part of any curriculum when there is no coherent FE model to teach?

There is a dynamic and growing body of work available but the main objective is to put in and keep the concept and data into the curriculum.

Quote from: markjo on March 30, 2011, 07:11:53 PM

Quote from: gotham on March 30, 2011, 06:03:23 PM

Yes, FET should be part of the standard cirriculum.

How can FET be a part of any curriculum when there is no coherent FE model to teach?

There is a dynamic and growing body of work available but the main objective is to put in and keep the concept and data into the curriculum.

When someone is able to produce a coherent FE model, then you might have a chance of having the concept included in someone's curriculum.  Until then, I don't see how any teacher could justify including FET in any serious curriculum except as a "what if" type thought experiment.

When someone is able to produce a coherent FE model, then you might have a chance of having the concept included in someone's curriculum.  Until then, I don't see how any teacher could justify including FET in any serious curriculum except as a "what if" type thought experiment.

So, long story short, you can readily produce a simple and effective way.

Quote from: markjo on March 30, 2011, 08:01:23 PM

When someone is able to produce a coherent FE model, then you might have a chance of having the concept included in someone's curriculum.  Until then, I don't see how any teacher could justify including FET in any serious curriculum except as a "what if" type thought experiment.

So, long story short, you can readily produce a simple and effective way.

  Perhaps you should make your story just a bit longer because I have no idea of what you're trying to say.