Firefox 4

  • 35 Replies
  • 5656 Views
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10061
Firefox 4
« on: March 30, 2011, 10:36:31 AM »
Looks nice. And quick. I'm contemplating using it in place of Chrome.

?

Blanko

  • 7206
  • Terrorist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2011, 12:12:08 PM »
The interface is almost exactly the same as in Opera.

*

Marcus Aurelius

  • 4546
  • My Alts: Tom Bishop, Gayer, theonlydann
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2011, 01:06:19 PM »
having some problems with it.  It will not play any youtube videos with advertisements at the beginning.  I tried clearing cache and turning off popup blocker adblock and everything else I can think of.  Still no good.

Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2011, 02:04:34 PM »
Looks butchered. I'm pissed.

*

Vindictus

  • 5455
  • insightful personal text
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2011, 03:09:37 PM »
I've migrated over to it. Works & looks fine.

Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2011, 03:42:52 PM »
i'm using the windows 64-bit nightly build and i'm quite happy with it. speed is ok and it looks cleaner than the previous versions

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8904
  • Semper vigilans
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2011, 05:10:58 PM »
Slower than IE so I'm sticking with IE
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2011, 06:26:00 PM »
I had to spend minutes configuring the toolbars to get it to look as close to FF3 as possible. And it still feels a bit odd.
Tabs on top? Fuck off, shitty default settings.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2011, 12:50:22 AM »
having some problems with it.  It will not play any youtube videos with advertisements at the beginning.  I tried clearing cache and turning off popup blocker adblock and everything else I can think of.  Still no good.

Unless you're using the HTML5 beta, this is most likely an issue with your Flash plugin and not with Firefox. YouTube plays just fine for me with Gnash 0.8.9.

Anyway, I've been using Iceweasel 4 since beta 12. I think it's a really nice improvement on the 3.x series, although for some reason the GNU/kFreeBSD version uses up extortionate amounts of CPU time (the GNU/Linux version is fine, though).
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 4016
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2011, 12:53:22 AM »
I had to spend minutes configuring the toolbars to get it to look as close to FF3 as possible. And it still feels a bit odd.
Tabs on top? Fuck off, shitty default settings.

Change is evil.
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.

Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2011, 12:55:51 AM »
I had to spend minutes configuring the toolbars to get it to look as close to FF3 as possible. And it still feels a bit odd.
Tabs on top? Fuck off, shitty default settings.

Change is evil.
It most certainly is.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2011, 01:00:37 AM »
It most certainly is.

If you like Firefox 3.x, you could always just use Debian squeeze. Iceweasel 3.5 is going to be supported in it until at least 2014.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Marcus Aurelius

  • 4546
  • My Alts: Tom Bishop, Gayer, theonlydann
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2011, 05:06:26 AM »
having some problems with it.  It will not play any youtube videos with advertisements at the beginning.  I tried clearing cache and turning off popup blocker adblock and everything else I can think of.  Still no good.

Unless you're using the HTML5 beta, this is most likely an issue with your Flash plugin and not with Firefox. YouTube plays just fine for me with Gnash 0.8.9.

Anyway, I've been using Iceweasel 4 since beta 12. I think it's a really nice improvement on the 3.x series, although for some reason the GNU/kFreeBSD version uses up extortionate amounts of CPU time (the GNU/Linux version is fine, though).

I haven't gotten a chance to fool with it too much.  Though I was going to try reinstalling flash next.  I was thinking it was an adblock or popup block that was doing it.  Any video that does not have that advertisement at the beginning works fine, IE is able to play the videos fine.  I was thinking of trying out html5 beta but I haven't really had a chance to research it too much yet. 

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2011, 05:12:48 AM »
I haven't gotten a chance to fool with it too much.  Though I was going to try reinstalling flash next.  I was thinking it was an adblock or popup block that was doing it.  Any video that does not have that advertisement at the beginning works fine, IE is able to play the videos fine.  I was thinking of trying out html5 beta but I haven't really had a chance to research it too much yet.

I tried using the HTML5 beta, but videos actually play better using Gnash than using WebM over HTML5.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 4016
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2011, 02:02:09 PM »
It most certainly is.

If you like Firefox 3.x, you could always just use Debian squeeze. Iceweasel 3.5 is going to be supported in it until at least 2014.

I'm not interesting in spending the majority of time forever installing Debian-related things.
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2011, 01:24:05 AM »
I'm not interesting in spending the majority of time forever installing Debian-related things.

???
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2011, 04:06:43 AM »
Slower than IE so I'm sticking with IE

IE is outdated, slow, and glitchy.  Chrome's a lot faster and has a lot more features.  Just sayin'.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #17 on: April 04, 2011, 04:12:34 AM »
IE is outdated

How is it outdated if a new version was brought out recently?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2011, 04:16:58 AM »
IE is outdated

How is it outdated if a new version was brought out recently?

"Outdated" as in lacking features that are currently offered by most other browsers.  Doesn't matter if there's a 'new version' or not.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2011, 05:16:50 AM »
"Outdated" as in lacking features that are currently offered by most other browsers.  Doesn't matter if there's a 'new version' or not.

Ah, so when you said "outdated" you didn't really mean "outdated."
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 4016
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #20 on: April 04, 2011, 05:26:09 AM »
"Outdated" as in lacking features that are currently offered by most other browsers.  Doesn't matter if there's a 'new version' or not.

Ah, so when you said "outdated" you didn't really mean "outdated."

Features don't matter?
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.

*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #21 on: April 04, 2011, 05:30:28 AM »
"Outdated" as in lacking features that are currently offered by most other browsers.  Doesn't matter if there's a 'new version' or not.

Ah, so when you said "outdated" you didn't really mean "outdated."

No, I certainly meant what I said.

If I released a "new version" of DOS, it would be "new", but still outdated. 

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2011, 12:45:54 AM »
Features don't matter?

That isn't what I said.

No, I certainly meant what I said.

If I released a "new version" of DOS, it would be "new", but still outdated.

Please explain to me how you creating your own operating system would make it outdated.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2011, 05:30:38 AM »
No, I certainly meant what I said.

If I released a "new version" of DOS, it would be "new", but still outdated.

Please explain to me how you creating your own operating system would make it outdated.

I didn't create my own operating system, I updated an old one.  However, due to the limitations of DOS, even if I "updated" it, it would still be outdated (compared to other operating systems).  I'm not sure why you're so confused here.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #24 on: April 06, 2011, 02:23:53 AM »
I didn't create my own operating system, I updated an old one.  However, due to the limitations of DOS, even if I "updated" it, it would still be outdated (compared to other operating systems).  I'm not sure why you're so confused here.

There is not, nor has there ever been, an operating system named "DOS." Therefore, if you released an operating system called DOS, it would be the first such operating system to be released.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #25 on: April 06, 2011, 04:14:31 AM »
I didn't create my own operating system, I updated an old one.  However, due to the limitations of DOS, even if I "updated" it, it would still be outdated (compared to other operating systems).  I'm not sure why you're so confused here.

There is not, nor has there ever been, an operating system named "DOS." Therefore, if you released an operating system called DOS, it would be the first such operating system to be released.

Yet if this new operating system lacked the features of any modern browser OS, it would still be outdated.

...which is my whole point.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 05:25:00 AM by Hessy »

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #26 on: April 06, 2011, 04:37:38 AM »
Yet if this new operating system lacked the features of any modern browser, it would still be outdated.

...which is my whole point.

Most operating systems lack the features of browsers. It stems from their being operating systems and not browsers.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #27 on: April 06, 2011, 05:26:29 AM »
Fix'd for your unscrupulous eyes.

*

Marcus Aurelius

  • 4546
  • My Alts: Tom Bishop, Gayer, theonlydann
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #28 on: April 06, 2011, 05:41:13 AM »
It ended up being my Firefox profile that was screwing me up somehow.  I removed it, reinstalled firefox, now everything works fine.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42529
Re: Firefox 4
« Reply #29 on: April 06, 2011, 08:05:30 PM »
Yet if this new operating system lacked the features of any modern browser, it would still be outdated.

...which is my whole point.

Most operating systems lack the features of browsers. It stems from their being operating systems and not browsers.

Windows 95 was a notable exception seeing as Microsoft made Internet Explorer an integrated part of that operating system.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.