« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Object on Iceburg

  • 11 Replies
  • 2387 Views
?

bwtkir

Object on Iceburg
« on: January 23, 2011, 06:41:50 PM »
http://blogs.abc.net.au/news/2011/01/a-chip-off-the-old-block.html

"I've heard the Southern Ocean attracts a hardy individual but a block of wood on an iceberg is ridiculous.

This lonely piece of timber was spotted on the top of a small berg at 66 degrees south, just north of Commonwealth Bay.

Wildlife watchers near Aurora Australis' bridge first thought it was a relaxing seal but it was soon apparent it was rectangular in shape.

How it got to such a prominent position, instead of just floating around, is anyone's guess."

Just wondering on the Flat Earth take on this one ?

Brett
Logged
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9548
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM »
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
Logged
*

Supertails

  • 4387
  • what do i put here
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2011, 01:31:55 AM »
Obviously a conspirator was watching from the ice wall and left his plank of wood on it, but the chunk broke off while he was on break.  This is evidence of the conspiracy!!!!!1
Logged
Recently listened to:

?

elkyur_troll

  • 64
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2011, 05:04:59 AM »
Quote from: Supertails on January 24, 2011, 01:31:55 AM
Obviously a conspirator was watching from the ice wall and left his plank of wood on it, but the chunk broke off while he was on break.  This is evidence of the conspiracy!!!!!1
+1
Logged
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17679
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2011, 05:19:18 AM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
I have to agree.  Its just a plank of wood. 
Logged
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.
?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 4016
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2011, 05:32:08 AM »
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:19:18 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
I have to agree.  Its just a plank of wood. 

I do find it amusing that no FE has understood the significance of the location.

Commonwealth Bay is in Antarctica.
Logged
Quote from: James on March 07, 2011, 09:22:09 AM
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17679
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2011, 05:58:12 AM »
Quote from: Horatio on January 24, 2011, 05:32:08 AM
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:19:18 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
I have to agree.  Its just a plank of wood. 

I do find it amusing that no FE has understood the significance of the location.

Commonwealth Bay is in Antarctica.
I know where Commonwealth bay is.  The location is perhaps significant;  A plank of wood in that location?  Interesting mystery perhaps;  that is all.
Logged
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.
?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 4016
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2011, 05:59:49 AM »
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:58:12 AM
Quote from: Horatio on January 24, 2011, 05:32:08 AM
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:19:18 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
I have to agree.  Its just a plank of wood. 

I do find it amusing that no FE has understood the significance of the location.

Commonwealth Bay is in Antarctica.
I know where Commonwealth bay is.  The location is perhaps significant;  A plank of wood in that location?  Interesting mystery perhaps;  that is all.

One would expect the people that found the plank to have also seen the Ice Wall, since they are in the right area.
Logged
Quote from: James on March 07, 2011, 09:22:09 AM
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17679
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2011, 06:01:32 AM »
Quote from: Horatio on January 24, 2011, 05:59:49 AM
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:58:12 AM
Quote from: Horatio on January 24, 2011, 05:32:08 AM
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:19:18 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
I have to agree.  Its just a plank of wood. 

I do find it amusing that no FE has understood the significance of the location.

Commonwealth Bay is in Antarctica.
I know where Commonwealth bay is.  The location is perhaps significant;  A plank of wood in that location?  Interesting mystery perhaps;  that is all.

One would expect the people that found the plank to have also seen the Ice Wall, since they are in the right area.
If it existed.  Many here hold the supposed "Icewall" to simply be the shelves along the Antarctic.  I don't hold any "wall" exists.  Many others don't as well.
Logged
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.
*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6543
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2011, 12:25:26 PM »
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 06:01:32 AM
Quote from: Horatio on January 24, 2011, 05:59:49 AM
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:58:12 AM
Quote from: Horatio on January 24, 2011, 05:32:08 AM
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:19:18 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
I have to agree.  Its just a plank of wood. 

I do find it amusing that no FE has understood the significance of the location.

Commonwealth Bay is in Antarctica.
I know where Commonwealth bay is.  The location is perhaps significant;  A plank of wood in that location?  Interesting mystery perhaps;  that is all.

One would expect the people that found the plank to have also seen the Ice Wall, since they are in the right area.
If it existed.  Many here hold the supposed "Icewall" to simply be the shelves along the Antarctic.  I don't hold any "wall" exists.  Many others don't as well.

Maybe more discussion is needed in the FEB part of the forum then.
Logged
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!
?

turtles

  • 774
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2011, 02:51:32 PM »
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 06:01:32 AM
Quote from: Horatio on January 24, 2011, 05:59:49 AM
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:58:12 AM
Quote from: Horatio on January 24, 2011, 05:32:08 AM
Quote from: John Davis on January 24, 2011, 05:19:18 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
I have to agree.  Its just a plank of wood. 

I do find it amusing that no FE has understood the significance of the location.

Commonwealth Bay is in Antarctica.
I know where Commonwealth bay is.  The location is perhaps significant;  A plank of wood in that location?  Interesting mystery perhaps;  that is all.

One would expect the people that found the plank to have also seen the Ice Wall, since they are in the right area.
If it existed.  Many here hold the supposed "Icewall" to simply be the shelves along the Antarctic.  I don't hold any "wall" exists.  Many others don't as well.

What keeps the air in then?
Logged
The Universal Accelerator is a constant farce.

Flattery will get you nowhere.

From the FAQ - "In general, we at the Flat Earth Society do not lend much credibility to photographic evidence."
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9548
Re: Object on Iceburg
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2011, 04:00:47 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 23, 2011, 09:51:01 PM
Why would we have a take any different that a RE'ers?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »