the standard of FEs

  • 30 Replies
  • 4611 Views
?

squevil

  • Official Member
  • 3184
  • Im Telling On You
the standard of FEs
« on: January 19, 2011, 07:50:15 PM »
How are we ment to take you seriously when you got Tom bishop and New Earth talking so much bs on the boards? You are both a couple of clowns who just do not have a clue about the world around them. the wannabe scientist and the biblical master should just keep quiet as they are turning the FES into (more of) a laughing stock.

i can swim well and hold my breath for longer than most: i can breathe under water

just a theory but are all FEs americans?

?

Mr Pseudonym

  • Official Member
  • 5448
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 09:09:13 PM »
How are we ment to take you seriously when you got Tom bishop and New Earth talking so much bs on the boards? You are both a couple of clowns who just do not have a clue about the world around them. the wannabe scientist and the biblical master should just keep quiet as they are turning the FES into (more of) a laughing stock.

i can swim well and hold my breath for longer than most: i can breathe under water

just a theory but are all FEs americans?

No.

Oh, and you can't breathe underwater.
Why do we fall back to earth? Because our weight pushes us down, no laws, no gravity pulling us. It is the law of intelligence.

?

fluffycornsnake

  • Official Member
  • 1307
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2011, 09:20:19 PM »
How are we ment to take you seriously when you got Tom bishop and New Earth talking so much bs on the boards? You are both a couple of clowns who just do not have a clue about the world around them. the wannabe scientist and the biblical master should just keep quiet as they are turning the FES into (more of) a laughing stock.

i can swim well and hold my breath for longer than most: i can breathe under water

just a theory but are all FEs americans?

How are we meant to take RE seriously if you make posts like this?

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2011, 11:16:57 PM »
How are we ment to take you seriously when you got Tom bishop and New Earth talking so much bs on the boards? You are both a couple of clowns who just do not have a clue about the world around them. the wannabe scientist and the biblical master should just keep quiet as they are turning the FES into (more of) a laughing stock.

i can swim well and hold my breath for longer than most: i can breathe under water

just a theory but are all FEs americans?


Please keep my name out of your mouth. Look at what this moron is saying here. He equates holding breath under water for few minutes with being able to breathe under water like fish. "Holding breath" actually means you can't  breath in water, otherwise you wouldn't have to hold your breath Einstein.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 11:21:57 PM by New Earth »
JJA voted for Pedro

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17670
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2011, 01:36:24 AM »
How are we ment to take you seriously when you got Tom bishop and New Earth talking so much bs on the boards? You are both a couple of clowns who just do not have a clue about the world around them. the wannabe scientist and the biblical master should just keep quiet as they are turning the FES into (more of) a laughing stock.

i can swim well and hold my breath for longer than most: i can breathe under water

just a theory but are all FEs americans?
The FES was founded in England.  Several of our members are English.  I myself am Canadian.  Some of our members are American though.

What you should be concerned with, instead of trying to slur and talk down to us, is prove that you have the right to do so.  Starting out with blatant prejudice is a huge step in the wrong direction.
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.

*

IOA

  • 507
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2011, 02:56:18 AM »
What you should be concerned with, instead of trying to slur and talk down to us, is prove that you have the right to do so.  Starting out with blatant prejudice is a huge step in the wrong direction.
In fairness, the basics of Flat Earth hypothesis are dependent on the idea that all Round Earthers are ignorant...

?

Thork

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2011, 12:17:19 PM »
I am English. I have been to the Bedford Canal. It is very flat indeed.

New Earth is a Newfag and a REr anyway. Tom Bishop is just on another level to most people. Whilst what he says may seem ridiculous to the simple-minded, those who can see the true meaning of his posts are always delighted at the eloquence of delivery and sheer insightfulness of observation.

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2011, 12:35:50 PM »
Re = Real earth
Fe = Fictional Earth,
Thats all and you can actually breathe under water if you find oxygen there.

?

Thork

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2011, 12:54:35 PM »
Re = Real earth
Fe = Fictional Earth,
Thats all and you can actually breathe under water if you find oxygen there.
H2O   ::)


Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2011, 03:12:55 PM »
I am English. I have been to the Bedford Canal. It is very flat indeed.

New Earth is a Newfag and a REr anyway. Tom Bishop is just on another level to most people. Whilst what he says may seem ridiculous to the simple-minded, those who can see the true meaning of his posts are always delighted at the eloquence of delivery and sheer insightfulness of observation.


Please sir, I never called you any names, so right now you are just being a coward, calling me new fag on the message board. Whats with gay slurs anyways? How juvenile. Well judging by your avatar you are no older then 15, so I will excuse you for now.

Tom Bishop is a great man, there is no reason for you insult him either. Yes it is true that I came here as RE, but after some compelling evidence presented on this forum, I now believe that the earth is flat.
JJA voted for Pedro

*

Vindictus

  • 5455
  • insightful personal text
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2011, 03:39:25 PM »
A troll calling a troll a troll.

Interesting.

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2011, 03:47:13 PM »
Now lets examine what a troll is; Trolls are Scandinavian mystical creatures. They look really ugly and short and possess the ability to do magic and cast spells. I on the other hand, am not Scandinavian, I look pretty hot, I'm not short and I don't do any magic, so no sir I'm not a troll.
JJA voted for Pedro

*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6543
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!

?

Thork

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2011, 03:53:03 PM »
I am English. I have been to the Bedford Canal. It is very flat indeed.

New Earth is a Newfag and a REr anyway. Tom Bishop is just on another level to most people. Whilst what he says may seem ridiculous to the simple-minded, those who can see the true meaning of his posts are always delighted at the eloquence of delivery and sheer insightfulness of observation.


Please sir, I never called you any names, so right now you are just being a coward, calling me new fag on the message board. Whats with gay slurs anyways? How juvenile. Well judging by your avatar you are no older then 15, so I will excuse you for now.

Tom Bishop is a great man, there is no reason for you insult him either. Yes it is true that I came here as RE, but after some compelling evidence presented on this forum, I now believe that the earth is flat.
Oh dear. Do you know anything about anything?

I did not call you gay.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Newfag

Unfortunately I am way more than 15.

+ I paid Tom a compliment. I enjoy his posts. Yours make me want to weep. ;(

EDIT: Additional: Take that back Vindictus. >:(

*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6543
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #14 on: January 20, 2011, 03:55:27 PM »
Quote
A term used by newfags
;)
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42529
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #15 on: January 20, 2011, 03:55:32 PM »
Now lets examine what a troll is; Trolls are Scandinavian mystical creatures. They look really ugly and short and possess the ability to do magic and cast spells. I on the other hand, am not Scandinavian, I look pretty hot, I'm not short and I don't do any magic, so no sir I'm not a troll.

*sigh*
Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional  response[1]  or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[2]  In addition to the offending poster, the noun troll can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in "that was an excellent troll you posted". While the term troll and its associated action trolling are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective, with trolling being used to describe intentionally provocative actions  outside of an online context. For example, recent media accounts have used the term troll to describe "a person who defaces internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families."[3][4]
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

doyh

  • 391
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2011, 04:08:30 PM »
I am English. I have been to the Bedford Canal. It is very flat indeed.

New Earth is a Newfag and a REr anyway. Tom Bishop is just on another level to most people. Whilst what he says may seem ridiculous to the simple-minded, those who can see the true meaning of his posts are always delighted at the eloquence of delivery and sheer insightfulness of observation.


Quote from:  Tom Bishop
Lurk Moar

Quote from:  Tom Bishop
Read the FAQ

So eloquent.
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #17 on: January 20, 2011, 04:55:27 PM »
Oh Poor Beorn gave a link to my profile and there is nothing there. I guess you are looking for my home address. Search no longer my dude, I will give it you if you want; just remember around these parts everyone is packing, so enter at your own risk.
JJA voted for Pedro

?

Nolhekh

  • 1669
  • Animator
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2011, 05:29:47 PM »
Yes it is true that I came here as RE, but after some compelling evidence presented on this forum, I now believe that the earth is flat.
If I may ask, what evidence specifically compelled you?

?

squevil

  • Official Member
  • 3184
  • Im Telling On You
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #19 on: January 20, 2011, 07:02:24 PM »
new earth i was purely commenting on the fact that you think that dolphins can breathe underwater.... i didnt realise TB was so well respected here, sorry i ment no harm. but atleast i see new earth doesnt hold the same respect. dolphins...lol surely you wasnt serious

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #20 on: January 20, 2011, 07:11:57 PM »
new earth i was purely commenting on the fact that you think that dolphins can breathe underwater.... i didnt realise TB was so well respected here, sorry i ment no harm. but atleast i see new earth doesnt hold the same respect. dolphins...lol surely you wasnt serious


Why do liberals love dolphins so much? Worship God, not Dolphins.
JJA voted for Pedro

?

doyh

  • 391
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #21 on: January 20, 2011, 07:12:51 PM »
new earth i was purely commenting on the fact that you think that dolphins can breathe underwater.... i didnt realise TB was so well respected here, sorry i ment no harm. but atleast i see new earth doesnt hold the same respect. dolphins...lol surely you wasnt serious

He's only respected among FE'ers.
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

?

doyh

  • 391
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #22 on: January 20, 2011, 07:15:48 PM »
new earth i was purely commenting on the fact that you think that dolphins can breathe underwater.... i didnt realise TB was so well respected here, sorry i ment no harm. but atleast i see new earth doesnt hold the same respect. dolphins...lol surely you wasnt serious


Why do liberals love dolphins so much? Worship God, not Dolphins.

Stop being a jerk. Telling atheists to believe in your god isn't going to make it so.
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

?

squevil

  • Official Member
  • 3184
  • Im Telling On You
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #23 on: January 20, 2011, 07:19:50 PM »
new earth simply likes to talk crap and argue, im just fueling his fire. but you are proving my point.
so long and thanks for all the fish

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #24 on: January 20, 2011, 07:47:22 PM »
Actually no I really don't like to talk crap and argue. I come here to learn new ideas. There are some really brilliant people on this forum like John Davis and Fluffycorn, but you RE'rs are really killing this really killing this.
JJA voted for Pedro

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17670
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #25 on: January 21, 2011, 11:56:25 AM »
What you should be concerned with, instead of trying to slur and talk down to us, is prove that you have the right to do so.  Starting out with blatant prejudice is a huge step in the wrong direction.
In fairness, the basics of Flat Earth hypothesis are dependent on the idea that all Round Earthers are ignorant...
True enough.  Though in equal fairness, so is the scientific method.
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.

Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #26 on: January 21, 2011, 12:33:09 PM »
What you should be concerned with, instead of trying to slur and talk down to us, is prove that you have the right to do so.  Starting out with blatant prejudice is a huge step in the wrong direction.
In fairness, the basics of Flat Earth hypothesis are dependent on the idea that all Round Earthers are ignorant...
True enough.  Though in equal fairness, so is the scientific method.
  yea i guess the whole scientific community is full of shit....

?

doyh

  • 391
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #27 on: January 21, 2011, 12:39:40 PM »
What you should be concerned with, instead of trying to slur and talk down to us, is prove that you have the right to do so.  Starting out with blatant prejudice is a huge step in the wrong direction.
In fairness, the basics of Flat Earth hypothesis are dependent on the idea that all Round Earthers are ignorant...
True enough.  Though in equal fairness, so is the scientific method.

I'm going to play ClockTower here, and ask you to provide proof of your outlandish claim.
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

?

Crustinator

  • 7813
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #28 on: January 21, 2011, 01:11:03 PM »
What you should be concerned with, instead of trying to slur and talk down to us, is prove that you have the right to do so.

You don't need anyone's permission to talk down to people. Welcome to the internez.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17670
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: the standard of FEs
« Reply #29 on: January 21, 2011, 01:32:14 PM »
What you should be concerned with, instead of trying to slur and talk down to us, is prove that you have the right to do so.  Starting out with blatant prejudice is a huge step in the wrong direction.
In fairness, the basics of Flat Earth hypothesis are dependent on the idea that all Round Earthers are ignorant...
True enough.  Though in equal fairness, so is the scientific method.

I'm going to play ClockTower here, and ask you to provide proof of your outlandish claim.


The scientific method would have no raison d'etre if everyone was not ignorant.  Because we would know everything.


Also, keep the thread on track.  All of you.
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.