Australia

  • 79 Replies
  • 13126 Views
Australia
« on: January 08, 2011, 02:02:37 AM »
Why does FE model rejects the existence of Australia?
JJA voted for Pedro

Re: Australia
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2011, 03:45:57 AM »
If the seven explored continents of earth are in a form of disc shaped map and the earth itself is an infinite plain as theorized by John Davis, then may be the lost continents of Lemuria and Atlantis were never in the Atlantic or Pacific oceans to begin with. Perhaps those two lost continents are outside the disc, meaning beyond the ice wall.
JJA voted for Pedro

*

Vindictus

  • 5455
  • insightful personal text
Re: Australia
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2011, 04:16:02 AM »
It doesn't reject the existence of Australia.

*

Jack1704

  • Official Member
  • 11311
  • Francine?!?!?
Re: Australia
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2011, 04:28:29 AM »
I rejeted the existence of australia. Especially as a cricketing nation.
Stop all this nonesense and bring on the lapdancers.
I understand Jack1704. It's a Brit thing.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42704
Re: Australia
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2011, 09:03:24 AM »
Why does FE model rejects the existence of Australia?

It's called a running gag.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

doyh

  • 391
Re: Australia
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2011, 09:04:45 AM »
That's a joke among RE'ers. They forgot to put Australia on a map.
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

?

Thork

Re: Australia
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2011, 09:29:46 AM »
That's a joke among RE'ers. They forgot to put Australia on a map.
Lurk on. Back to May 1978.
This is an old FEr joke on REr's. Here is an example of me using it.
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=44089.msg1092946#msg1092946
The guy ended up making another thread about Australia as he really bit on this one. Its a short thread, but very funny. I am very funny in it at least. :)
It was invented by an FEr - Charles K Johnson from his article "Australia not down under". Its clearly our joke. REr's trying to claim it, is like black people claiming the n-word for themselves. You are just trying to tone down the humiliation it has caused, by pretending its yours.  
We have a superior sense of humour as well as a superior grasp as to the nature of earth's form.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2011, 09:33:44 AM by Thork »

?

doyh

  • 391
Re: Australia
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2011, 09:45:20 AM »
That's a joke among RE'ers. They forgot to put Australia on a map.
Lurk on. Back to May 1978.
This is an old FEr joke on REr's. Here is an example of me using it.
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=44089.msg1092946#msg1092946
The guy ended up making another thread about Australia as he really bit on this one. Its a short thread, but very funny. I am very funny in it at least. :)
It was invented by an FEr - Charles K Johnson from his article "Australia not down under". Its clearly our joke. REr's trying to claim it, is like black people claiming the n-word for themselves. You are just trying to tone down the humiliation it has caused, by pretending its yours.  
We have a superior sense of humour as well as a superior grasp as to the nature of earth's form.

Very well then. That was how it was explained to me. But it doesn't change the fact that someone forgot to put Australia on a map.
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

?

Thork

Re: Australia
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2011, 09:51:55 AM »
It was explained wrong, because as usual you were given misinformation by RErs on this site. The problem is that you only ever ask FErs for evidence. You just take other REr statements as fact. Now that you know I am someone who can separate for you all the truths from the lies, let me enlighten you. The RErs are also wrong about earth's shape. Its flat!

?

doyh

  • 391
Re: Australia
« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2011, 10:26:20 AM »
It was explained wrong, because as usual you were given misinformation by RErs on this site. The problem is that you only ever ask FErs for evidence. You just take other REr statements as fact. Now that you know I am someone who can separate for you all the truths from the lies, let me enlighten you. The RErs are also wrong about earth's shape. Its flat!

No, I gathered my info from lurking. Also: haven't you admitted to being a troll? Or was that someone else?
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

?

Thork

Re: Australia
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2011, 04:14:51 PM »
someone else.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Australia
« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2011, 04:46:26 PM »
someone else.

Lol. Deleting the post doesn't mean you didn't do it.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9548
Re: Australia
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2011, 08:09:47 PM »
someone else.

Lol. Deleting the post doesn't mean you didn't do it.

What are you referring to?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Australia
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2011, 10:43:52 PM »
someone else.

He is a horrible troll too. It's very sad that I never banned him.

?

Thork

Re: Australia
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2011, 06:22:05 AM »
someone else.

He is a horrible troll too. It's very sad that I never banned him.
You are definitely thinking of someone else. I have never been banned by anyone.
And definitely not a troll. I wonder if the word troll is changing its meaning over time. It seems to be used by people who just disagree with you. :(

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12260
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Australia
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2011, 07:14:09 AM »
I wonder if the word troll is changing its meaning over time.
See also: Norse mythology.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

spanner34.5

  • 4642
  • feck arse drink
Re: Australia
« Reply #16 on: January 10, 2011, 07:32:10 AM »
Why does FE model rejects the existence of Australia?
Parsifal lives in Australia, he should confirm it does not exist.
My I.Q. is 85. Or was it 58?

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12260
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Australia
« Reply #17 on: January 10, 2011, 07:36:11 AM »
Parsifal lives in Australia, he should confirm it does not exist.
Old. He's already proven it doesn't. I also proved that there are actually two Australias, while ClockTower suggested that there, in fact, is just one Australia. Agnosticism might be the way to go.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

spanner34.5

  • 4642
  • feck arse drink
Re: Australia
« Reply #18 on: January 10, 2011, 07:39:46 AM »
Parsifal lives in Australia, he should confirm it does not exist.
Old. He's already proven it doesn't. I also proved that there are actually two Australias, while ClockTower suggested that there, in fact, is just one Australia. Agnosticism might be the way to go.
I am not sure if I believe in agnosticism.
My I.Q. is 85. Or was it 58?

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Australia
« Reply #19 on: January 10, 2011, 08:29:13 AM »
Parsifal lives in Australia, he should confirm it does not exist.
Old. He's already proven it doesn't. I also proved that there are actually two Australias, while ClockTower suggested that there, in fact, is just one Australia. Agnosticism might be the way to go.
I am not sure if I believe in agnosticism.

awesome.

I say australia is on the other side of the disc, that's why they leave head-down but without falling down. They are being pushed up by the UA.
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12260
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Australia
« Reply #20 on: January 10, 2011, 09:23:52 AM »
I say australia is on the other side of the disc, that's why they leave head-down but without falling down. They are being pushed up by the UA.
Wouldn't they die from being squished until they die?
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Australia
« Reply #21 on: January 10, 2011, 09:55:51 AM »
someone else.

He is a horrible troll too. It's very sad that I never banned him.
You are definitely thinking of someone else. I have never been banned by anyone.
And definitely not a troll. I wonder if the word troll is changing its meaning over time. It seems to be used by people who just disagree with you. :(

I was agreeing with you.

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Australia
« Reply #22 on: January 10, 2011, 10:39:43 AM »
I say australia is on the other side of the disc, that's why they leave head-down but without falling down. They are being pushed up by the UA.
Wouldn't they die from being squished until they die?

Unless Earth applies some force down (being all the space above it "filled with" void would prevent this), UA force wouldn't squeez anything. UA would push the disc up, or the people would be pushed up, pushing the disc up at the same time. I see no prob.
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12260
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Australia
« Reply #23 on: January 10, 2011, 10:46:33 AM »
The pressure required to push the Earth up would quite certainly be harmful to humans.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

?

Thork

Re: Australia
« Reply #24 on: January 10, 2011, 02:33:49 PM »
The pressure required to push the Earth up would quite certainly be harmful to humans.
Its why the abos evolved really sturdy skin.
This guy below is only 17.

That's what direct exposure to UA does to you.

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Australia
« Reply #25 on: January 10, 2011, 03:12:08 PM »
The pressure required to push the Earth up would quite certainly be harmful to humans.

There is no preassure because there's no opossing force. It's a light unharmful touch.

Or what Thork said, I'm investigating.
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences

*

IOA

  • 507
Re: Australia
« Reply #26 on: January 10, 2011, 04:37:07 PM »
Orrr the Earth is round and everything makes sense?...

Seriously, I still don't understand why you guys think gravity doesn't affect Earth for some reason. Is there really no reason? Because I haven't found an object yet that doesn't exhibit gravity.

*

gotham

  • Planar Moderator
  • 3564
Re: Australia
« Reply #27 on: January 10, 2011, 05:02:22 PM »
Orrr the Earth is round and everything makes sense?...

Seriously, I still don't understand why you guys think gravity doesn't affect Earth for some reason. Is there really no reason? Because I haven't found an object yet that doesn't exhibit gravity.

But there is not definitive scientific proof of gravity.  No?

*

IOA

  • 507
Re: Australia
« Reply #28 on: January 10, 2011, 05:04:57 PM »
There's no definitive scientific proof for Universal Acceleration either. The proof for gravity is directly observed. There are plenty of experiments to demonstrate gravity, and not a single object has been found to disobey the law of gravity. There's no reason to believe anything otherwise.

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Australia
« Reply #29 on: January 11, 2011, 01:20:38 AM »
Gravity and Upward acceleration are equivalents.
While everyone knows that upwards accelerated movements exist and how it works, and Gravity remains unexplained, we can get an easy conclusion.

Am I becoming a FE'er?
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences