2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse

  • 16 Replies
  • 6808 Views
*

ipfo

  • 73
  • +0/-0
  • Hello, world.
2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« on: January 02, 2011, 03:11:50 PM »
Hello FES, I am back again!

You've probably seen many pictures of the total lunar eclipse happened about two weeks ago. Here are three from yours truly. The pictures were taken with Canon 40D and iPhone 4 through Celestron XLT120 telescope.







It was unfortunate that the clouds start rolling back in when the Moon was coming back. As you can see in the sequence shot, I couldn't capture the entire way through. Bummers!

Well, I hope you all enjoyed the shots, and hopefully this provide a little break from all the hectic semantics battles. I see FES is still keeping it classy even after all these years. ;)

*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2011, 03:51:58 PM »
Holy shit! Those are incredible pictures! I plan on getting a DSLR camera for myself in the near future, and a telescope attachment, so I can take pictures like these. My father apparently has owned a somewhat powerful telescope since the late 80s, so perhaps one day I'll put it all together and take some pictures like you. Great photography.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2011, 05:41:38 PM »
Awesome pics. It was too cloudy to see very well from where I am so I only got a couple peeks at it. Nice work.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2011, 06:00:17 PM »

Further evidence that there are multiple moons.
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2011, 05:53:18 AM »
Hello FES, I am back again!

You've probably seen many pictures of the total lunar eclipse happened about two weeks ago. Here are three from yours truly. The pictures were taken with Canon 40D and iPhone 4 through Celestron XLT120 telescope.

http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/4326/redmooni.jpg

http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/4864/redmoonii.jpg

http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/2103/2010totallunareclipse.jpg

It was unfortunate that the clouds start rolling back in when the Moon was coming back. As you can see in the sequence shot, I couldn't capture the entire way through. Bummers!

Well, I hope you all enjoyed the shots, and hopefully this provide a little break from all the hectic semantics battles. I see FES is still keeping it classy even after all these years. ;)

FET does not deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.

?

pizzaguy

  • 50
  • +0/-0
  • Ever seen two pretty rear ends like these?
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2011, 03:31:20 PM »
FET does not deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.
Which begs the question:
Why not deny that reality along with everything else?   ::)
Pizzaguy IS about the most informative and logical REer here.

?

doyh

  • 391
  • +0/-0
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2011, 06:03:39 PM »
Hello FES, I am back again!

You've probably seen many pictures of the total lunar eclipse happened about two weeks ago. Here are three from yours truly. The pictures were taken with Canon 40D and iPhone 4 through Celestron XLT120 telescope.

http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/4326/redmooni.jpg

http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/4864/redmoonii.jpg

http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/2103/2010totallunareclipse.jpg

It was unfortunate that the clouds start rolling back in when the Moon was coming back. As you can see in the sequence shot, I couldn't capture the entire way through. Bummers!

Well, I hope you all enjoyed the shots, and hopefully this provide a little break from all the hectic semantics battles. I see FES is still keeping it classy even after all these years. ;)

FET does not deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.

No one's arguing here. Go away.
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2011, 01:05:26 AM »
FET does not deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.
Which begs the question:
Why not deny that reality along with everything else?   ::)

I don't see what the point of this thread is. We don't deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.

You guys might as well be showing us a picture of a tree. We don't deny that trees exist.

What is the purpose of this thread?

*

fenterb

  • 135
  • +0/-0
  • Part of the conspiracy
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2011, 03:25:53 AM »
FET does not deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.
Which begs the question:
Why not deny that reality along with everything else?   ::)

I don't see what the point of this thread is. We don't deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.

You guys might as well be showing us a picture of a tree. We don't deny that trees exist.

What is the purpose of this thread?

This thread is in not in the debate section.  It does not need to have a 'purpose' other than to discuss the earth and its satellites. 

However it is still worth noting that lunar eclipses are perfectly predicted by the internally consistent RE solar system model... coincidence?

?

doyh

  • 391
  • +0/-0
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2011, 12:51:20 PM »
FET does not deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.
Which begs the question:
Why not deny that reality along with everything else?   ::)

I don't see what the point of this thread is. We don't deny that the Lunar Eclipse occurs.

You guys might as well be showing us a picture of a tree. We don't deny that trees exist.

What is the purpose of this thread?

This thread is in not in the debate section.  It does not need to have a 'purpose' other than to discuss the earth and its satellites. 

However it is still worth noting that lunar eclipses are perfectly predicted by the internally consistent RE solar system model... coincidence?

Speaking of which, why do we debate in General? Seems to make more sense to do it on debate.
If we would all stop deflecting questions, maybe we could get somewhere.

*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2011, 01:33:11 PM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop
What is the purpose of this thread?

Quote from: ipfo
Well, I hope you all enjoyed the shots, and hopefully this provide a little break from all the hectic semantics battles

Way to miss the point, Tom. In other forums I've been to (regardless of content), the moderators would be kind enough to remove irrelevant posts like yours. Your comments don't belong here.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2011, 04:31:19 PM »
Beautiful pictures, thank you.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

StephenFlatMan

  • 61
  • +0/-0
  • THE EARTH IS A SPHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2011, 02:04:01 AM »
Further evidence that there are multiple moons.


Umm What. That doesn't Prove or give Evidence of that At all
WHO LET THE DOGS OUT!?
WHO WHO WHO?

*

fenterb

  • 135
  • +0/-0
  • Part of the conspiracy
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2011, 04:06:34 AM »
Further evidence that there are multiple moons.


Umm What. That doesn't Prove or give Evidence of that At all

Do not feed the troll

*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2011, 10:47:30 AM »
Umm What. That doesn't Prove or give Evidence of that At all
Why would you Think so, Kind Sir?
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)

?

StephenFlatMan

  • 61
  • +0/-0
  • THE EARTH IS A SPHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2011, 11:04:47 AM »
Umm What. That doesn't Prove or give Evidence of that At all
Why would you Think so, Kind Sir?

Well, its Pictures of the Same Moon, and the one with Multiple Moons is i think the Cycle of the Moons :3
WHO LET THE DOGS OUT!?
WHO WHO WHO?

*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6521
  • +1/-0
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: 2010.12.21 Total Lunar Eclipse
« Reply #16 on: January 10, 2011, 01:31:56 PM »
Where is that "Ignore posts with ridiculous capitalization" button when you need it.
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!