Same as evolution - it's no different.
Except there is no evidence for evolution.
Many missing links
Many missing links exist within the evolution theory, especially in relation to the fossil record. Since Darwin’s day, evolutionists have still not been able to find them.
Richard E. Leakey: ‘‘Unfortunately no fossils have yet been found of animals ancestral to the bats.’’
Martin R. D: ‘‘There are no fossils available as plausible ancestors of the primates, leaving the primate tree without a trunk.’’
A. S Romer: ‘‘The origin of rodents is obscure...no transitional forms are known.’’
Robert L. Carroll: ‘‘The transition between pelycosaurs and therapsids has not been documented.’’
Robert L. Carroll: ‘‘We have no intermediate fossils between rhipidistian fish and early amphibians.’’
Alfred Sherwood Romer: ‘‘The common ancestor of the bony-fish groups is unknown.’’
Evolution is pure faith
Evolution cannot be observed or experimented; it is therefore not scientific but based on pure faith or imagination. Many notable academics have noted upon this.
Karl Popper: ‘‘Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory but a metaphysical research program.’’
Michael Denton [On the theory of evolution] ‘‘…as it was in Darwin’s time, a highly speculative hypothesis entirely without direct factual support and very far from that self-evident axiom some of its more ‘aggressive advocates’ would have us believe.’’
Dr. Fleishmann: ‘‘The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination.’’
L. Harrison Matthews: ‘‘The theory of evolution forms… a faith on which to base our interpretation of nature.’’