Evidence you asked for.

  • 46 Replies
  • 13843 Views
?

JAQIOUS_LESOAP

Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #30 on: July 12, 2005, 08:12:39 AM »
HALLO I HERD DAT THE EARTH IS A TRIANGLE ACCORDING TO MY THEORIY OF LIFE LOLX YOU GUYS LOOSE /QUIT.

?

FUKTARD

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #31 on: July 12, 2005, 09:17:36 AM »
Ive heard some wacko theories in my time but this takes the fuking cake!

DO u really think the earth is flat.  F F S!

Im sure there isnt a single scientist or astronomer which believes this garbage.

Even my dog knows the earth in spherical...

WELCOME TO THE 21 CENTURY ! ! ! ! !

?

bcampestris

  • 58
  • +0/-0
Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #32 on: July 14, 2005, 05:09:47 AM »
Quote from: "FUKTARD"
Ive heard some wacko theories in my time but this takes the fuking cake!

DO u really think the earth is flat.  F F S!

Im sure there isnt a single scientist or astronomer which believes this garbage.

Even my dog knows the earth in spherical...

WELCOME TO THE 21 CENTURY ! ! ! ! !


I imagine it can spell and punctuate too.

?

flatman

  • 99
  • +0/-0
Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #33 on: July 14, 2005, 05:51:59 AM »
But you cant think logically.

?

bcampestris

  • 58
  • +0/-0
Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #34 on: July 14, 2005, 12:56:53 PM »
Quote from: "flatman"
But you cant think logically.


Yes I can.

?

flatman

  • 99
  • +0/-0
Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #35 on: July 14, 2005, 12:57:34 PM »
Quote from: "bcampestris"
Quote from: "flatman"
But you cant think logically.


Yes I can.


Nope.

?

Mr. Obvious

Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #36 on: July 14, 2005, 11:21:38 PM »
Has nobody else noticed that not a single person has tried to contradict the topic creator?  each and every person is merely insulting "rounders" for lack of grammatical skills.

?

Anonymous

Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #37 on: July 15, 2005, 02:44:01 AM »
Quote from: "Mr. Obvious"
Has nobody else noticed that not a single person has tried to contradict the topic creator?  each and every person is merely insulting "rounders" for lack of grammatical skills.


You are quite right, let us return to the question of a triangular earth.

?

bcampestris

  • 58
  • +0/-0
Re: Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #38 on: July 15, 2005, 05:27:47 AM »
From the original post:

Quote from: "I feel some how my proof is a little to much proof for you people and ill be grilled however i know i can instantly discount 99.999% of what you say and that 0.001% i can't instantly discount. ill find a way to discount it in a few minutes.[url
[/url]



Beware, Satan comes in many guises, sometimes we need the light faith to see the truth.

?

Lucretius

  • 13
  • +0/-0
Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #39 on: July 15, 2005, 12:18:12 PM »
"Satan's greatest feat was convincing the world that he didn't exsist."
HHHHHahahahahaha! eh hem...
-Luc

?

Druox

Just some thoughts..
« Reply #40 on: July 19, 2005, 11:22:13 AM »
The thought that people who lived in Columbus' time (or any time since the third century B.C.) believed the world was flat is more urban legend than fact.

So how did this myth get started? Washington Irving’s horribly inaccurate biography of Christopher Columbus, published in 1828, and a scholarly article by French scholar Antoine-Jean Letronne, published in 1834.

Irving apparently wanted a dramatic image that would grip his readers, so he castColumbus as the bold mariner who argued courageously for truth and common sense before a council of inquisitors and hooded theologians. In fact, Columbus did appear before a council to defend his ideas. But it was a council of scientists, and the issue was not the roundness of the globe, but how far Columbus would have to sail to reach Asia. The scientists thought that Columbus had grievously underestimated the distance. And they were right.

The Greeks were among those who speculated much about the shape of the Earth. As is well known, Thales claimed that the Earth was flat whereas Anaximander made it a "stone column". The earliest claim for the round shape of the Earth known to me came from Pythagoras. It was reported that Pythagoras reasoned from the perpetual round shape of lunar eclipses that the Earth could neither be flat nor cylindrical, but only spherical. Please refer to John Burnet's Greek Philosophy Part 1: Thales to Plato. (London: MacMillan, 1914), P.44. Similar views can be found in Aristotle's opus.

?

Lonewulf

Oog, I'm gonna be sick.
« Reply #41 on: July 28, 2005, 11:12:53 AM »
Okay, I'm going to say this:  Everyone that tries to disprove these guys... you ma as well give up.  It's useless.  THey're just gonna spew bull**** about faith and how they BELIEVE that everything that has ever been learned in two millenium is false.  Whether by faith or by pseudoscience.  They don't want to have a legitimate argument, they just want to sidestep and evade all proof, or thrust forward false notions that any expert could discredit in a few seconds.

   Do something that has more promise:  Keep hitting a 1 foot thick brick wall with a stick until the wall shatters.  Then you at least get some exercise.

?

WTF

  • 256
  • +0/-0
Re: Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #42 on: July 28, 2005, 04:39:39 PM »
Quote from: "bcampestris"

Beware, Satan comes in many guises, sometimes we need the light faith to see the truth.


On what basis is faith grounds for determination of truth?  If I had faith that invisible pink unicorns kept the earth aloft with farts, is that reasonable?  No.  But to some people living today, a dude who walked on water and came back from the dead and healed the blind and turned water to wine isn't much more credible than the unicorn theory.  So on what basis can we really use faith as as a measuring stick?

?

Lonewulf

Well, d'uh.
« Reply #43 on: July 28, 2005, 09:14:54 PM »
'Cause they read it in a book.  D'uh, man.  I mean, isn't it obvious that everything you read in a book you can accept fully and without question, as long as you hide behind the word faith?

?

EricTheRed

  • 106
  • +0/-0
  • Cogito et sum
Re: Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #44 on: February 27, 2007, 08:18:22 PM »
Evidence?  Have you looked outside?  The earth is flat.  I can see it with my own eyes.  It is the round-earth "believers" that must prove otherwise.


Have YOU looked outside?

This has got to be a joke, haha funny... You lot need an Encyclopedia throw at your heads, A VERY HEAVY Encyclopedia!

Ok here we go ill prove every single one of you wrong. You dumbass....

Ok THE most common shape in the Universe is the sphere the proof of this is water. In Zero gravity water forms Spheres and STFU if you say it doesn’t here in is video footage and no it's not a real photograph that is taken out of all context. Here is video footage showing exactly what it is showing how water behaves in space. Not a picture of a glacier with the tag line its the ring of ice around the world!

How Water behaves in space
You will need real player to view this. Real player

How Water behaves in space WMP video 1

How Water behaves in space WMP video 2

How Water behaves in space WMP video 3

Irrelevant: Same thing happens in the "vomit comet" - where they train "astronauts" - just a jet in free fall.  Just because raindrops are roundish doesn't prove that the earth is any more than it proves pyramids are round.
How do you explain away that? "Oh the water is flat too" well no.. No it's not you can see all the way around in and threw it water hides nothing in this case it is pure and takes on its purest form. Or are their tiny refracting satellite mirrors orbiting the water?

Matter is exactly the same only on a much larger scale as gravity is required as water will just cling together as its atomic structure is such that it quickly forms bonds of attraction with other water molecules these are easy broken but allow a large sphere of water to form in one place.

Matter on the other hand requires gravity like I said, once a large enough gravitational force forms the matter will collide or move toward each other once they become large enough to extrude a large enough gravitational force by themselves. The asteroid belt is a good example of this the asteroids (which are mostly spherical) they are orbiting the sun which is another thing I will cover in a moment. They orbit and collide some of these collisions form a larger asteroid, these are called planetoids before you start screaming "its not true". These large planetoids will also collide with other planetoids and asteroids as well as dust and ice and grow. They may one day grow into planets over the course of millions of years. But it will be some kind of spherical shape elliptical is probably the closest thing to flat you may get.
If the earth is a thin disk, it won't generate a large gravitational field.

But this ring of ice crap is completely ridiculous. when we said how come ur vision of earth has no end u said there’s a ring of ice..

Ok taking this at face value. Get in an airplane and fly over Africa and carry on eventually you will fly over Africa again and if your vision of Earth were true you would never reach Africa again. Hell Africa might not exist in ur messed up vision of things... and if you did reach Africa again you would almost certainly going in the opposite direction. there is only one explanation for coming to the same place again and again and that is a sphere...
No, we just need the magnetic field to be circular, so the compass leads us to fly in circles.  Perhaps gyro-compasses are affected by the Coriolis force.

Or are you going to change ur mind again and say that it is a barrel shape? With ice round the Edge...

Your statements are unfounded and without proof and a picture of a glacier is not proof nor of an underground cave.

That flat looking thing when you go to the seaside is called a Horizon if you look over the English channel on a clear day you can see France.. and if... IF you get on a boat you can go there and it looks a lot longer and broader once your there than the 4 or 5 miles that you can see.

The horizon is an illusion caused by the upward curvature of light.

Disprove me... id like to see you try, Give me more ammunition with which to gun you down... I await your replies....

You have all been living in caves for 2 or 3 hundreds years an have not been to school or read a book or used this wonderful tool called the internet to form informed comments on real issues.

So in closing: Google it n00b


I feel some how my proof is a little to much proof for you people and ill be grilled however i know i can instantly discount 99.999% of what you say and that 0.001% i can't instantly discount. ill find a way to discount it in a few minutes.http://
"Subtle is the Lord" Albert Einstein

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #45 on: February 27, 2007, 08:23:57 PM »
You suck at quoting.  Either way, light doesn't curve because it feels like it.  You have no evidence for your theory. Stop posting it. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: Evidence you asked for.
« Reply #46 on: February 27, 2007, 08:42:46 PM »
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.