EAT violates the Laws of Optics

  • 33 Replies
  • 7148 Views
*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: EAT violates the Laws of Optics
« Reply #30 on: September 04, 2010, 06:38:38 PM »
The abstract states:

Reading the abstract is not the same as reading the article.

The abstract is a summary of the article.

Neither the title or abstract mention anything about the straightness of light over long distances.
1) Yes, the abstract does. Learn the definition of "velocity". If velocity doesn't change over long distances then light has traveled in striaght line over long distances.
2) Please read the article before arguing about it further.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45169
  • +98/-138
Re: EAT violates the Laws of Optics
« Reply #31 on: September 04, 2010, 06:46:18 PM »
The abstract is a summary of the article.

Reading the summary of an article is not the same as reading the article.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

TheJackel

  • 1269
  • +0/-0
Re: EAT violates the Laws of Optics
« Reply #32 on: September 04, 2010, 07:41:28 PM »
The abstract states:

Reading the abstract is not the same as reading the article.

The abstract is a summary of the article.

Neither the title or abstract mention anything about the straightness of light over long distances.

You clearly are incapable of being apart of this discussion since you have shown yourself to be completely clueless on the subject.  ::)
FE T-shirts = Profit = conspiracy = ideological cult in the making = teaching stupid = paranoia = nut case. Any questions?

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: EAT violates the Laws of Optics
« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2010, 07:48:58 AM »
Quote
Some of them proved that light travelled in straight lines.

Who proved that light travels in straight lines?  ???

Rowbotham?