NEXT WEEK I WILL PROVE THE EARTH IS ROUND !

I am to holiday on Kefalonia next week. I have taken holidays there before and i am aware that from my room, which is upon high, i can see the beach and on the horizon is a shipping lane for the cruise ships visiting the various islands. The beach is no more than 50 yards from the rooms balcony. Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand, with camera, on the balcony whilst i stand directly in line on the beach. We will take a photograph, on DLP's mark (seeing a ship on the horizon) I am convinced that i will not have a ship in my photo yet my DLP, 50 yards away, will.

If nothing else i will have done more experimentation than anyone else since Rowbum.

You mean you'll prove the Earth is flat?

If the Earth was flat we would both see the cruise ship, it's a matter of 50 yards.

Quite clearly my hypothesis states that i will prove the earth is round.
I have gone on to explain my hypothesis. Next i will prove my hypothesis and provide my conclusion in due course.

Quote from: Eddy Baby on August 27, 2010, 04:37:32 AM

You mean you'll prove the Earth is flat?

If the Earth was flat we would both see the cruise ship, it's a matter of 50 yards.

Quite clearly my hypothesis states that i will prove the earth is round.
I have gone on to explain my hypothesis. Next i will prove my hypothesis and provide my conclusion in due course.

Good on you. But its probably gonna be more like your DLP with see more of the ship than you do. But that doesn't make much of a difference. You do need a good zoom though, to have some FErs actually convinced.

Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand

if (DLP != gay_hairdresser_from_wigan && DLP.tits == nice) {
   request_post_pics(now);
}

I am to holiday on Kefalonia next week. I have taken holidays there before and i am aware that from my room, which is upon high, i can see the beach and on the horizon is a shipping lane for the cruise ships visiting the various islands. The beach is no more than 50 yards from the rooms balcony. Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand, with camera, on the balcony whilst i stand directly in line on the beach. We will take a photograph, on DLP's mark (seeing a ship on the horizon) I am convinced that i will not have a ship in my photo yet my DLP, 50 yards away, will.

If nothing else i will have done more experimentation than anyone else since Rowbum.

Being that you have formed a predetermined outcome and that you are "convinced" that the experiment will produce results that you have already decided upon, you can forgive us not being credulous with your conclusion.  At this point, any number of things could skew your results, from an unconscious altering of the data to flat-out lying to meet the aforementioned predetermined conclusion.  The integrity of this experiment is already appallingly questionable.

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 27, 2010, 04:25:04 AM

I am to holiday on Kefalonia next week. I have taken holidays there before and i am aware that from my room, which is upon high, i can see the beach and on the horizon is a shipping lane for the cruise ships visiting the various islands. The beach is no more than 50 yards from the rooms balcony. Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand, with camera, on the balcony whilst i stand directly in line on the beach. We will take a photograph, on DLP's mark (seeing a ship on the horizon) I am convinced that i will not have a ship in my photo yet my DLP, 50 yards away, will.

If nothing else i will have done more experimentation than anyone else since Rowbum.

Being that you have formed a predetermined outcome and that you are "convinced" that the experiment will produce results that you have already decided upon, you can forgive us not being credulous with your conclusion.  At this point, any number of things could skew your results, from an unconscious altering of the data to flat-out lying to meet the aforementioned predetermined conclusion.  The integrity of this experiment is already appallingly questionable.

How odd we didn't hear you say this about Ichy's experiment. I guess you must have just thought that up.

The good thing about this experiment is it's easy to verify objectively.

Quote from: Pongo on August 27, 2010, 09:02:57 PM

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 27, 2010, 04:25:04 AM

I am to holiday on Kefalonia next week. I have taken holidays there before and i am aware that from my room, which is upon high, i can see the beach and on the horizon is a shipping lane for the cruise ships visiting the various islands. The beach is no more than 50 yards from the rooms balcony. Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand, with camera, on the balcony whilst i stand directly in line on the beach. We will take a photograph, on DLP's mark (seeing a ship on the horizon) I am convinced that i will not have a ship in my photo yet my DLP, 50 yards away, will.

If nothing else i will have done more experimentation than anyone else since Rowbum.

Being that you have formed a predetermined outcome and that you are "convinced" that the experiment will produce results that you have already decided upon, you can forgive us not being credulous with your conclusion.  At this point, any number of things could skew your results, from an unconscious altering of the data to flat-out lying to meet the aforementioned predetermined conclusion.  The integrity of this experiment is already appallingly questionable.

How odd we didn't hear you say this about Ichy's experiment. I guess you must have just thought that up.

Ichi's experiment was about moonlight, not RET vs. FET.  What could he possibly have been biased in favor of?

Quote from: ClockTower on August 27, 2010, 09:12:08 PM

Quote from: Pongo on August 27, 2010, 09:02:57 PM

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 27, 2010, 04:25:04 AM

I am to holiday on Kefalonia next week. I have taken holidays there before and i am aware that from my room, which is upon high, i can see the beach and on the horizon is a shipping lane for the cruise ships visiting the various islands. The beach is no more than 50 yards from the rooms balcony. Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand, with camera, on the balcony whilst i stand directly in line on the beach. We will take a photograph, on DLP's mark (seeing a ship on the horizon) I am convinced that i will not have a ship in my photo yet my DLP, 50 yards away, will.

If nothing else i will have done more experimentation than anyone else since Rowbum.

Being that you have formed a predetermined outcome and that you are "convinced" that the experiment will produce results that you have already decided upon, you can forgive us not being credulous with your conclusion.  At this point, any number of things could skew your results, from an unconscious altering of the data to flat-out lying to meet the aforementioned predetermined conclusion.  The integrity of this experiment is already appallingly questionable.

How odd we didn't hear you say this about Ichy's experiment. I guess you must have just thought that up.

Ichi's experiment was about moonlight, not RET vs. FET.  What could he possibly have been biased in favor of?

False. RET holds that moonlight is safe on Earth. From the works of Rowbotham to James, FET holds that moonlight is dangerous on Earth. Ichy set out to prove moonlight dangerous. It most certainly was RET vs. FET.

I am to holiday on Kefalonia next week. I have taken holidays there before and i am aware that from my room, which is upon high, i can see the beach and on the horizon is a shipping lane for the cruise ships visiting the various islands. The beach is no more than 50 yards from the rooms balcony. Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand, with camera, on the balcony whilst i stand directly in line on the beach. We will take a photograph, on DLP's mark (seeing a ship on the horizon) I am convinced that i will not have a ship in my photo yet my DLP, 50 yards away, will.

If nothing else i will have done more experimentation than anyone else since Rowbum.

Don't waste your time.  Nothing you say will change anyone's mind so just give up now and save yourself frustration of people saying "no you're wrong because "Earth Not a Globe" says so.

Quote from: Saddam Hussein on August 28, 2010, 12:35:01 AM

Quote from: ClockTower on August 27, 2010, 09:12:08 PM

Quote from: Pongo on August 27, 2010, 09:02:57 PM

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 27, 2010, 04:25:04 AM

I am to holiday on Kefalonia next week. I have taken holidays there before and i am aware that from my room, which is upon high, i can see the beach and on the horizon is a shipping lane for the cruise ships visiting the various islands. The beach is no more than 50 yards from the rooms balcony. Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand, with camera, on the balcony whilst i stand directly in line on the beach. We will take a photograph, on DLP's mark (seeing a ship on the horizon) I am convinced that i will not have a ship in my photo yet my DLP, 50 yards away, will.

If nothing else i will have done more experimentation than anyone else since Rowbum.

Being that you have formed a predetermined outcome and that you are "convinced" that the experiment will produce results that you have already decided upon, you can forgive us not being credulous with your conclusion.  At this point, any number of things could skew your results, from an unconscious altering of the data to flat-out lying to meet the aforementioned predetermined conclusion.  The integrity of this experiment is already appallingly questionable.

How odd we didn't hear you say this about Ichy's experiment. I guess you must have just thought that up.

Ichi's experiment was about moonlight, not RET vs. FET.  What could he possibly have been biased in favor of?

False. RET holds that moonlight is safe on Earth. From the works of Rowbotham to James, FET holds that moonlight is dangerous on Earth. Ichy set out to prove moonlight dangerous. It most certainly was RET vs. FET.

How funny that most of their citations are all from RET advocates  

Using particular citations does not mean that they are used properly, or that their conclusion necessarily follows from them.

How funny that most of their citations are all from RET advocates  

Yes, it is rather amusing how someone can present citations in a misleading way.

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 27, 2010, 04:25:04 AM

I am to holiday on Kefalonia next week. I have taken holidays there before and i am aware that from my room, which is upon high, i can see the beach and on the horizon is a shipping lane for the cruise ships visiting the various islands. The beach is no more than 50 yards from the rooms balcony. Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand, with camera, on the balcony whilst i stand directly in line on the beach. We will take a photograph, on DLP's mark (seeing a ship on the horizon) I am convinced that i will not have a ship in my photo yet my DLP, 50 yards away, will.

If nothing else i will have done more experimentation than anyone else since Rowbum.

Being that you have formed a predetermined outcome and that you are "convinced" that the experiment will produce results that you have already decided upon, you can forgive us not being credulous with your conclusion.  At this point, any number of things could skew your results, from an unconscious altering of the data to flat-out lying to meet the aforementioned predetermined conclusion.  The integrity of this experiment is already appallingly questionable.

I have formed a Hypothesis - A hypothesis (from Greek ??; plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. The term derives from the Greek, ? – hypotithenai meaning "to put under" or "to suppose." For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it.

dick head

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 27, 2010, 04:25:04 AM

Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand

if (DLP != gay_hairdresser_from_wigan && DLP.tits == nice) {
   request_post_pics(now);
}

Those curly braces are unnecessary, since you only have one command within the if statement.

Quote from: Crustinator on August 27, 2010, 01:36:54 PM

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 27, 2010, 04:25:04 AM

Therefore I intend to have my domestic life partner (DLP) stand

if (DLP != gay_hairdresser_from_wigan && DLP.tits == nice) {
   request_post_pics(now);
}

Those curly braces are unnecessary, since you only have one command within the if statement.

incorrect

Also, monkeybradders, I look forward to your proof of bendy light. Thank you for your contribution to the cause.

Also, monkeybradders, I look forward to your proof of bendy light. Thank you for your contribution to the cause.

AHHHHAAAAAAA i'm doing the experiment at night. i.e no light   
























i know.

night. i.e no light   

What?

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 28, 2010, 09:51:05 AM

night. i.e no light   

What?

i'm doing my experiment at night so there is no light to bend





















i know.

Maybe you should do the experiment in a cave so that there is no light to bend.

Maybe you should do the experiment in a cave so that there is no light to bend.

We can't, they're all filled with Flat Earther's.

"If beauty is from within, then Kefalonia is a fine example with its well documented and strange geological phenomena which are manifested in its vast underground water network, subterranean lakes and stalactite encrusted caverns! Wherever you stay on Kefalonia, it is easy to visit the centrally located caves of Drogarati and the underground lake of Melisani."

I still hope the experiments are not conducted in caves. Bendy light theory sound most intriguing and I owe myself a search through the site to see what all the buzz is about.   

i'm doing my experiment at night so there is no light to bend

I await your proof of Bendy Darkness.

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 28, 2010, 02:50:27 PM

i'm doing my experiment at night so there is no light to bend

I await your proof of Bendy Darkness.

You do understand that if light bends then so must darkness, right?

"If beauty is from within, then Kefalonia is a fine example with its well documented and strange geological phenomena which are manifested in its vast underground water network, subterranean lakes and stalactite encrusted caverns! Wherever you stay on Kefalonia, it is easy to visit the centrally located caves of Drogarati and the underground lake of Melisani."

I still hope the experiments are not conducted in caves. Bendy light theory sound most intriguing and I owe myself a search through the site to see what all the buzz is about.   

It's very simple to show why it's wrong.

1) If the light in FE theory bends as to say these two objects/observers on the same plane can't see each other, Each object would be in a Parabolic bowl..

(0) = Objects / observers
( _ ) = ground

0________________________________0

So how is light bending to where these two objects can't see each other?

1) Well, there would be a Wave between the two objects where each object is in a parabolic Bowl at the vertex position..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Parabola_with_focus_and_arbitrary_line.svg

This wave would be a Parabolic Dome to where the top of this dome would equal the horizon.. This means that the focal point would be above their heads! And this is the first reason why the FE theory is false.. Thus according to FE the greater the distance the higher the wave is between the two observer objects.. Hence even if they climbed up a tree they wouldn't be able to see each other..

2) We add 2 more Objects or Observers:

0_________0___________0___________0

Now if we add the bend (wave) between all these objects, we get a parabolic wave pattern to where every observer is in a parabolic bowl because none of these Objects could see each other according to FE theory... So here FE is trying to state that it's a bending wavelength across a flat surface where every observer is in a parabolic bowl..

3) We add reflection, and diffusion..(mountains, trees, water, or whatever else that light reflects off of)

0______<MW|___^_____~~~~~~~~~~_____0

When you try to have a parabolic wave length it collapses do to light reflecting and diffusing across the surface.. You can call this a collapse of wave function. Hence there would be severe warping and distortion  to which would easily be noticeable as the source of light we call the sun moves from east to west, and rises and sets on the horizon...

And I don't know about you, but I don't have to look up above my head to see the horizon

Quote from: PizzaPlanet on August 29, 2010, 09:23:04 PM

Quote from: monkeybradders on August 28, 2010, 02:50:27 PM

i'm doing my experiment at night so there is no light to bend

I await your proof of Bendy Darkness.

You do understand that if light bends then so must darkness, right?

Yes. That's exactly why I said it.

I didn't do this experiment because i couldn't afford it, people might have laughed at me and other such excuses.

Anyway whilst we were flying into land we flew directly over a cruise ship then performed a 180 turn to the left to approach the runway. It was interesting to watch to ship dissapear into the horizon the lower the plane got until PPPOOOOOOOOFFF it was gone and i could no longer see it when the plane was on the runway.

Anyway whilst we were flying into land we flew directly over a cruise ship then performed a 180 turn to the left to approach the runway. It was interesting to watch to ship dissapear into the horizon the lower the plane got until PPPOOOOOOOOFFF it was gone and i could no longer see it when the plane was on the runway.

Were there any survivors?

Quote from: monkeybradders on September 20, 2010, 04:38:10 AM

Anyway whilst we were flying into land we flew directly over a cruise ship then performed a 180 turn to the left to approach the runway. It was interesting to watch to ship dissapear into the horizon the lower the plane got until PPPOOOOOOOOFFF it was gone and i could no longer see it when the plane was on the runway.

Were there any survivors?

No everyone died, even me.

No everyone died, even me.

I meant on the ship that sank, silly.