Looking back on the thread now, you can plainly see I said the numbers aren't accurate and based on my model. Your starting numbers are still incorrect.
Try again please.
Unless you publish your model and its numbers then there's no reason to believe that your model is any better than the model TJ shows to be wrong. If your model could survive that analysis then I'm sure that FEers would gladly approve of it over the demonstratively wrong model in the FAQ.
I'm always surprised how little consensus there is in the FE community. I surmise that it's because the underlying theory itself is worthless.
ClockTower, I agree. And Iche, you never stated anything about "your model" when you made that comment. And as ClockTower states, you can feel free to give me your model for review. Somehow I doubt that will ever happen.
Arguing from a position of phantom data doesn't make you at all credible. Nor does this make any numbers you believe to be correct as being "correct numbers".
And not walking around with a meter stick every second of the day is not an excuse. This is more like in line with the fact that you have nothing to offer on this subject. Until you do, you are no position to be making arguments on this subject. FE had just as much time in history to establish itself as did RE, get over it and deal with it. No excuses, either provide the data or don't bother posting.