That pertained to the math.. The only difference is that he was talking about a constant 9.8 meters of steady acceleration, and I was talking about how that would be impossible if you take in consideration of the age of the Earth. Steady acceleration isn't going to erase the problem I have shown above even though it would provide steady amount of force. Hence actual velocity matters.
His math was correct when saying the thing you are dropping wouldn't fall as fast as you said because before it was dropped it was moving as fast as everything else.
The time we have been accelerating is irrelevant.
Lrn2specialrelativity.
Provided of course his estimation of 9.8m's a sec is correct.. And I was basing that notion on the idea that there was still another attractor other than velocity.. But yes he would be correct in that sense. I did a crappy job writing that post. However, I have pointed out that 9.8 meters a second and how old Earth is doesn't make any sense. Hence, Earths actual total velocity would be impossible regardless of the 9.8 meters a second steady acceleration. I hope this clears up where we were both coming from 
I never estimated that. This is BS big time. Analysis helps, hope ameripenguins learn some in school.
velocity is measured in meters per second, acceleration however is measured in meters per second
-squared. This is your first mistake, and you go on using that forever. Im not usually that picky but this is actually important.
Then, I agree with english gentlemen: lrn2specialrelativity.
Im not going to give you a formula, he did already anyway, but I will explain:
To accelerate you need a force and that needs energy. Agree? But a little part of this energy is not being used for acceleration, it seems to just get lost. Instead, to an observer standing in the initial position of the body with initial velocity of the body, the accelerated body seems to gain mass and contract (seems to become less long - kinda squeezed). to someone on this body, there is no notable effect, but instead that distant observer, who one is seemingly travelling further and further away, seems to gain mass and contract.
Now, the greater your speed becomes in relation to your starting point (the observer), the more of the energy seems so just get lost, the more mass one seems to have when observed by the observer in the old starting position and the more your length is being contracted. Hence first of all, you need to define "constant acceleration". If you mean constant to that distant observer, then after some time you will need to put in every bit of energy of the universe and still you will not reach the speed of light, because just before you reach it, 99.9999999999999999% of any more extra energy put in will account for the effects discribed above, instead of acceleration.
If you only want to "feel an acceleration of 9,8m/s²" on the accelerating body however, be aware that this is indeed possible. Because in each moment, the velocity you have will be your frame of reference and when accelerating, you only accelerate a little bit away from that frame of reference, you will not feel any relativistic effects. However just because you, being on this body, feel an acceleration of 9,8m/s², this doesnt mean that a guy standing in the starting position will see you accelerating at the same rate. Instead, for him you will be moving really fucking fast after billions of years and a lot of the energy you use will - to him - seems to "just get lost" due to mass gain and length contraction, and your actual acceleration relative to him will be really small, but you yourself will think that all energy goes into acceleration only and your acceleration relative to the point where you would have been if you didnt accelerate in that moment will be the same as always and you can keep going on like this forever.
For somebody (I guess like you) who doesn't understand the principles of relativity - I don't think anybody understands it perfectly (einstein once said: "Nobody really understands physics/relativity, we just get used to it!"), but still - this seems rather unintuitive. But if you lrn2specialrelativity you will find this is whats going to happen. Hence, your calculations are terribly wrong.
Q.E.D.
/edit:
To put it back into a discussion aber UA:
For it to work even as a simple concept, from the above the UA would have to not only accelerate the earth but itself, too, at the same rate, so the earth and the UA will share the same frame of reference. But even then this is magical thinking and quite ridiculous. More so, if the UA didnt move with the earth, the entire energy of the whole universe would be used up quite fast.
I dont understand how FETishists who believe in UA believe how UA works. Please elaborate.