In a Lockean appeal to the inclusion of a society, certain self-fueled actions are lost with compliance of the rules of the society you are joining. Admittedly, Locke would argue that the protection society granted would be primarily protection of property, but as society expanded, so did its umbrella of protection. In any given first-world society today, one can expect to find members who demand protection of propriety, protection of ideas, and even protection from what they find uncomfortable. However, it it not society's role to protect you from what you find uncomfortable. I honestly don't know how John Locke would categorize this type of protection and I'm not entirely sure I would listen to much of what the man has to say beyond his governmental writings, he after all considered people to be property. The point that I would like you to take away from this digression is this: Grow a pair and click the delete button, a PM isn't hurting anyone.