Painting glaciers.

  • 40 Replies
  • 10966 Views
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Painting glaciers.
« on: June 17, 2010, 08:42:00 PM »
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/latin_america/10333304.stm

Is there really any chance this will work?

*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2010, 09:35:00 AM »
It'll look like it's working from a distance.
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2010, 09:50:56 AM »
Someone needs to tell the BBC that the 1st of April was two and a half months ago.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2010, 02:01:27 PM »
In limited theory, it should cause changes. Whether that simple change counteracts any and all other variables in the surrounding area will remain to be seen. I am, however, curious as to whether they've spoken to any meteorologists or other scientists.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2010, 02:50:11 PM »
The idea has scientific merit, but it's flaw lies in the rest of the world.  You can paint a whole country white, but if the other side of the world absorbs a lot of energy, it's not going to make enough of a difference.
Gone.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2010, 06:51:32 PM »
At most they will undue the damage that was caused by the loss of the glacier, but this will not fix what originally caused the glacier to melt.

Perhaps it will work, but we really need to look at some sort of terraforming to fix this problem. We need to generate some carbon dumps and perhaps release something into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space. There are more problems to an earth warming than just it being hotter, oceans hold less carbon when they warm meaning we may be unable to stop this once it starts.

*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2010, 11:42:26 PM »
At most they will undue the damage that was caused by the loss of the glacier, but this will not fix what originally caused the glacier to melt.

Perhaps it will work, but we really need to look at some sort of terraforming to fix this problem. We need to generate some carbon dumps and perhaps release something into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space. There are more problems to an earth warming than just it being hotter, oceans hold less carbon when they warm meaning we may be unable to stop this once it starts.
What's funny is shipping boats on they routes they go now do a great job of polluting the atmosphere, which in turns reflects sunlight. Plans are to do it less.
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2010, 08:51:41 AM »
I think we should paint everything white, then start genetically engineering trees and grass to produce white chlorophyll.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2010, 02:58:35 PM »
I think we should paint everything white, then start genetically engineering trees and grass to produce white chlorophyll.

Well, until we figure out how chlorophyl works well enough to produce even a green equivalent, i doubt we could do that second part.

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2010, 07:16:31 AM »
I think we should paint everything white, then start genetically engineering trees and grass to produce white chlorophyll.

Well, until we figure out how chlorophyl works well enough to produce even a green equivalent, i doubt we could do that second part.

Pessimist.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2010, 09:48:31 AM »
I think we should paint everything white, then start genetically engineering trees and grass to produce white chlorophyll.

Well, until we figure out how chlorophyl works well enough to produce even a green equivalent, i doubt we could do that second part.

Pessimist.

Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2010, 09:52:41 AM »
Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

Are you fucking serious, Galvani?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2010, 09:53:55 AM »
Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

Are you fucking serious, Galvani?

No chlorophyl has ever been shown to utilize light outside of the visible spectrum. I therefore conclude that it is impossible for it to do so.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2010, 09:57:55 AM »
No chlorophyl has ever been shown to utilize light outside of the visible spectrum. I therefore conclude that it is impossible for it to do so.

I was implying that your statement was obvious, not that it was false.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Lorddave

  • 19824
  • +28/-60
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2010, 03:15:37 PM »
If we genetically altered chlorophyl, It wouldn't be chlorophyl anymore.

I call naming rights!
Gone.

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2010, 05:18:00 PM »
Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

Are you fucking serious, Galvani?
says the man who thinks burnt wood will move on its own to create optical illusions as a part of the conspiracy.
I'd say white pigment genes would be easier than the feat you posed

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #16 on: June 22, 2010, 09:16:19 AM »
Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

Are you fucking serious, Galvani?
says the man who thinks burnt wood will move on its own to create optical illusions as a part of the conspiracy.
I'd say white pigment genes would be easier than the feat you posed

White pigment genes would be insanely easy. A chemical that absorbs certain wavelengths of light to move an electron along an electron transport chain yet emits all wavelengths equally is what is impossible.

Think before you post.

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #17 on: June 22, 2010, 10:22:26 AM »
Is there really any chance this will work?

Two hectares of white paint does not a global warming prevent.

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #18 on: June 22, 2010, 09:15:56 PM »
Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

Are you fucking serious, Galvani?
says the man who thinks burnt wood will move on its own to create optical illusions as a part of the conspiracy.
I'd say white pigment genes would be easier than the feat you posed

White pigment genes would be insanely easy. A chemical that absorbs certain wavelengths of light to move an electron along an electron transport chain yet emits all wavelengths equally is what is impossible.

Think before you post.
huh, I was saying how white pigment genes is a lot easier than what Parsifal once said: modifying wood so that when burnt, drawn in a grid of squares, separated by gray margins with white circles at the corners, the color black will spontaneously appear at the corners when the viewer is not looking at that specific location. like this image

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #19 on: June 23, 2010, 01:48:20 PM »
Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

Are you fucking serious, Galvani?

No chlorophyl has ever been shown to utilize light outside of the visible spectrum. I therefore conclude that it is impossible for it to do so.

So we genetically modify it to be a very pale green.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #20 on: June 23, 2010, 10:06:01 PM »
Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

Are you fucking serious, Galvani?
says the man who thinks burnt wood will move on its own to create optical illusions as a part of the conspiracy.
I'd say white pigment genes would be easier than the feat you posed

White pigment genes would be insanely easy. A chemical that absorbs certain wavelengths of light to move an electron along an electron transport chain yet emits all wavelengths equally is what is impossible.

Think before you post.
huh, I was saying how white pigment genes is a lot easier than what Parsifal once said: modifying wood so that when burnt, drawn in a grid of squares, separated by gray margins with white circles at the corners, the color black will spontaneously appear at the corners when the viewer is not looking at that specific location. like this image

Cool.

So you want to put white pigment in with the chlorophyl? That will work out amazingly, the pigment will reflect all the light, and the plant will die from lack of energy.

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #21 on: June 23, 2010, 11:25:18 PM »
Also, a white chlorophyl would reflect all visible wavelengths. So it would absorb no energy.

Are you fucking serious, Galvani?
says the man who thinks burnt wood will move on its own to create optical illusions as a part of the conspiracy.
I'd say white pigment genes would be easier than the feat you posed

White pigment genes would be insanely easy. A chemical that absorbs certain wavelengths of light to move an electron along an electron transport chain yet emits all wavelengths equally is what is impossible.

Think before you post.
huh, I was saying how white pigment genes is a lot easier than what Parsifal once said: modifying wood so that when burnt, drawn in a grid of squares, separated by gray margins with white circles at the corners, the color black will spontaneously appear at the corners when the viewer is not looking at that specific location. like this image

Cool.

So you want to put white pigment in with the chlorophyl? That will work out amazingly, the pigment will reflect all the light, and the plant will die from lack of energy.
I never said that it was practical or smart. I thought Parsifal was talking about the impossibility of your idea. but clearly the guy doesn't know anything about pigments because of they above.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #22 on: June 26, 2010, 05:47:05 AM »
Actually his idea is possible, white chlorophyl is not with out atmosphere.

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #23 on: June 26, 2010, 10:43:50 AM »
Actually his idea is possible, white chlorophyl is not with out atmosphere.
are you serious? pigment that moves around with no energy source ad infinitum, that only disappears when you are looking at the dot? that means we could be looking at different parts of it, my spot wouldn't be dark for me, but it would for you. also remember the wood is BURNT. And it only does this if you arrange the ashes in a very specific pattern.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #24 on: June 26, 2010, 02:32:51 PM »
Actually his idea is possible, white chlorophyl is not with out atmosphere.
are you serious? pigment that moves around with no energy source ad infinitum, that only disappears when you are looking at the dot? that means we could be looking at different parts of it, my spot wouldn't be dark for me, but it would for you. also remember the wood is BURNT. And it only does this if you arrange the ashes in a very specific pattern.

Still more likely than chlorophyl that is white.

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #25 on: June 27, 2010, 05:57:42 PM »
Actually his idea is possible, white chlorophyl is not with out atmosphere.
are you serious? pigment that moves around with no energy source ad infinitum, that only disappears when you are looking at the dot? that means we could be looking at different parts of it, my spot wouldn't be dark for me, but it would for you. also remember the wood is BURNT. And it only does this if you arrange the ashes in a very specific pattern.

Still more likely than chlorophyl that is white.
It's impossible. One person can't view something as existing, while the other person can if they are both staring at the same time for an extended period of time. Also how would the pigment know where you were looking?  Are you a wizard?

it could still absorb the UA and infared spectrum.
also it wouldn't be that hard to manufacture a white pigment.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #26 on: June 27, 2010, 06:02:05 PM »
One person can't view something as existing, while the other person can if they are both staring at the same time for an extended period of time.

Write harder.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #27 on: June 29, 2010, 09:58:00 AM »
Actually his idea is possible, white chlorophyl is not with out atmosphere.
are you serious? pigment that moves around with no energy source ad infinitum, that only disappears when you are looking at the dot? that means we could be looking at different parts of it, my spot wouldn't be dark for me, but it would for you. also remember the wood is BURNT. And it only does this if you arrange the ashes in a very specific pattern.

Still more likely than chlorophyl that is white.
It's impossible. One person can't view something as existing, while the other person can if they are both staring at the same time for an extended period of time. Also how would the pigment know where you were looking?  Are you a wizard?
Are you saying the image you posted doesn't show the same thing?
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #28 on: June 29, 2010, 11:37:34 AM »
Actually his idea is possible, white chlorophyl is not with out atmosphere.
are you serious? pigment that moves around with no energy source ad infinitum, that only disappears when you are looking at the dot? that means we could be looking at different parts of it, my spot wouldn't be dark for me, but it would for you. also remember the wood is BURNT. And it only does this if you arrange the ashes in a very specific pattern.

Still more likely than chlorophyl that is white.
It's impossible. One person can't view something as existing, while the other person can if they are both staring at the same time for an extended period of time. Also how would the pigment know where you were looking?  Are you a wizard?

it could still absorb the UA and infared spectrum.
also it wouldn't be that hard to manufacture a white pigment.

You are retarded. Infrared can't penetrate through cell walls easily, and is a very low energy carrier. As for "manufacturing a white pigment" that is irrelevant, it is the problem of reflecting all wavelengths of light while still absorbing some that is impossible.

You might as well be claiming a batter batted 1000 this year yet he struck out some of the time. Being white and absorbing wavelengths are mutually exclusive, hence impossible.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Painting glaciers.
« Reply #29 on: June 29, 2010, 12:31:31 PM »
Being white and absorbing visual wavelengths are mutually exclusive, hence impossible.

Fix'd.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.