James' Ideas on the Sun and Moon

he started denying that you can photograph the Moon with a thermal imaging camera

It is a well known fact that the light of the Sun has the effect of diminishing fires which have already been started. In fact, this is in all probability the origin of the famous saying "the Sun has no heat", although this is figurative as we in fact know it is the Moon which has no heat. The sun's light has a curative effect on biomass which tends to preserve it against damage, thus any fire which consumes fuel such as wood, fossil fuels or indeed any biological matter will be dampened by exposure to sunlight.

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on June 13, 2010, 10:24:39 AM

he started denying that you can photograph the Moon with a thermal imaging camera

Did he really?  He's worse than I thought... then again, I should've been tipped off when he went on about an autocannibalistic moon.

Quote from: jackofhearts on June 13, 2010, 10:29:33 AM

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on June 13, 2010, 10:24:39 AM

he started denying that you can photograph the Moon with a thermal imaging camera

Did he really?  He's worse than I thought... then again, I should've been tipped off when he went on about an autocannibalistic moon.

I don't see what is so ridiculous about that.  The biolum life on the moon must eat...

Quote from: jackofhearts on June 13, 2010, 10:29:33 AM

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on June 13, 2010, 10:24:39 AM

he started denying that you can photograph the Moon with a thermal imaging camera

Did he really?  He's worse than I thought... then again, I should've been tipped off when he went on about an autocannibalistic moon.

I don't see what is so ridiculous about that.  The biolum life on the moon must eat...

Quote from: John Davis on June 14, 2010, 09:31:20 PM

Quote from: jackofhearts on June 13, 2010, 10:29:33 AM

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on June 13, 2010, 10:24:39 AM

he started denying that you can photograph the Moon with a thermal imaging camera

Did he really?  He's worse than I thought... then again, I should've been tipped off when he went on about an autocannibalistic moon.

I don't see what is so ridiculous about that.  The biolum life on the moon must eat...

Well considering that all energy on Earth (aside from Geothermal) comes from the Sun, I wonder where all the energy for the moon comes from?

But without any energy input, the moon would have shrunk noticeably over the course of human history, possibly even in our lifetime.

Quote from: General Disarray on June 14, 2010, 09:36:20 PM

But without any energy input, the moon would have shrunk noticeably over the course of human history, possibly even in our lifetime.

The moon is getting smaller.  And it is noticeable.  This is likely why Round Earthers often hold that the moon is moving away from us at 4cm per year.

I don't see what is so ridiculous about that.  The biolum life on the moon must eat...

Quote from: General Disarray on June 14, 2010, 09:36:20 PM

But without any energy input, the moon would have shrunk noticeably over the course of human history, possibly even in our lifetime.

The moon is getting smaller.  And it is noticeable.  This is likely why Round Earthers often hold that the moon is moving away from us at 4cm per year.

Quote from: John Davis on June 14, 2010, 09:31:20 PM

I don't see what is so ridiculous about that.  The biolum life on the moon must eat...

Wise words oh brother John. Does this mean that the flat earth is also autocanibalistic?

Quote from: Crustinator on June 15, 2010, 03:33:10 AM

Quote from: John Davis on June 14, 2010, 09:31:20 PM

I don't see what is so ridiculous about that.  The biolum life on the moon must eat...

Wise words oh brother John. Does this mean that the flat earth is also autocanibalistic?

How does that follow?

I'm still wondering about his explanation for "The Sun puts out fires" and "The moon causes fires".  He merely stated that "it it well known" and "it has been observed", without properly backing up those ludicrous statements.

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 03:52:25 AM

Quote from: Crustinator on June 15, 2010, 03:33:10 AM

Quote from: John Davis on June 14, 2010, 09:31:20 PM

I don't see what is so ridiculous about that.  The biolum life on the moon must eat...

Wise words oh brother John. Does this mean that the flat earth is also autocanibalistic?

How does that follow?

Thank you for your reply and kind words Brother John. I hope you are well. The earth also has biolum life.

but we have no evidence that this is happening.

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 04:04:01 AM

but we have no evidence that this is happening.

How are you able to draw conclusions without evidence?

I'm still wondering about his explanation for "The Sun puts out fires" and "The moon causes fires".  He merely stated that "it it well known" and "it has been observed", without properly backing up those ludicrous statements.

I am not.

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 04:12:27 AM

I am not.

This is another correct  and insightful observation Brother John!

We must wait until we discover what kind of meals the biolum are preparing before we reach the conclusion that this is causing the moon to shrink.

Quote from: jackofhearts on June 15, 2010, 02:47:46 AM

I'm still wondering about his explanation for "The Sun puts out fires" and "The moon causes fires".  He merely stated that "it it well known" and "it has been observed", without properly backing up those ludicrous statements.

Quote from: Sliver on June 12, 2010, 08:28:17 PM

Well, 5.5 hours with nothing from James.  RE WIN!!!!

Waiting 5.5 hours for someone who only shows up maybe every few days or so is a win?  

Quote from: jackofhearts on June 15, 2010, 04:14:37 AM

Quote from: jackofhearts on June 15, 2010, 02:47:46 AM

I'm still wondering about his explanation for "The Sun puts out fires" and "The moon causes fires".  He merely stated that "it it well known" and "it has been observed", without properly backing up those ludicrous statements.

Delivery:

Well from Google, the first hit was this thread, but I also got a Nature article from 1877, I lie to you not
check it out here http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v16/n414/abs/016477b0.html

FE'ers like Tom, Ichi, and Levee are experts at finding old an outdate sources to proved their claims,
the theory here is that combustion occurs at a lower rate in air that has been rarefied by the Sun.
Note that the article I'm using as a source is questioning the validity of the Sun extinguisher theory.
And If you use the Ichimaru logic of cause and effect, since moonlight is basically darkness empiraclly

Quote from: Thevoiceofreason on June 15, 2010, 04:34:52 AM

Quote from: jackofhearts on June 15, 2010, 04:14:37 AM

Quote from: jackofhearts on June 15, 2010, 02:47:46 AM

I'm still wondering about his explanation for "The Sun puts out fires" and "The moon causes fires".  He merely stated that "it it well known" and "it has been observed", without properly backing up those ludicrous statements.

Delivery:

Well from Google, the first hit was this thread, but I also got a Nature article from 1877, I lie to you not
check it out here http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v16/n414/abs/016477b0.html

FE'ers like Tom, Ichi, and Levee are experts at finding old an outdate sources to proved their claims,
the theory here is that combustion occurs at a lower rate in air that has been rarefied by the Sun.
Note that the article I'm using as a source is questioning the validity of the Sun extinguisher theory.
And If you use the Ichimaru logic of cause and effect, since moonlight is basically darkness empiraclly

Good God... like the way they keep clinging desperately to ENaG?  It seems they think that, just because it's a published book, all of its content is 100% correct.  "But it's written in the book!! How can it possibly be wrong?!"...

Unless you can discredit the evidence it presents...

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 08:07:09 AM

Unless you can discredit the evidence it presents...

Surely the same rule applies for any RE evidence?

Please note, saying "It's clearly fake" does not count as discrediting.