I signed up to ask this about UA, can someone please answer?

I believe the explanation used that explains this in this model is that there is a bowshock effect.

Also, stop with the off topic and content-less posts.  Consider this a warning.

I believe the explanation used that explains this in this model is that there is a bowshock effect.

Unfortunately, the bowshock effect doesn't work that way, especially if the FE is an infinite plane. 

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 01:01:49 AM

I believe the explanation used that explains this in this model is that there is a bowshock effect.

Unfortunately, the bowshock effect doesn't work that way, especially if the FE is an infinite plane. 

Obviously.  If the earth is an infinite plane the UA becomes even more ridiculous.

How exactly does it work then?

Quote from: markjo on June 15, 2010, 06:42:17 AM

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 01:01:49 AM

I believe the explanation used that explains this in this model is that there is a bowshock effect.

Unfortunately, the bowshock effect doesn't work that way, especially if the FE is an infinite plane. 

Obviously.  If the earth is an infinite plane the UA becomes even more ridiculous.

How exactly does it work then?

Well, technically it depends on what context you use the term.  In an astronomical context:

A bow shock is a boundary between a magnetosphere  and an ambient medium. For stars, this is typically the boundary between their stellar wind and the interstellar medium.

In a planetary magnetosphere, the bow shock is the boundary at which the speed of the solar wind abruptly drops as a result of its approach to the magnetopause. The best-studied example of a bow shock is that occurring where the solar wind encounters the Earth's magnetopause, although bow shocks occur around all magnetized planets. The Earth's bow shock is about 100-1000 km thick and located about 90,000 km (55,000 miles) from the Earth.

And looks something like this:


However, in an aerodynamic context:

A bow shock, also called a detached shock, is a curved, stationary shock wave that is found in supersonic flow past a finite body. Unlike an oblique shock, the bow shock is not necessarily attached to the tip of the body.

And look something like this:


Neither case resembles the situation with the UA as theorized in FET.

The first does.  The UA is pushing on the bottom of the earth.  The bowshock is pushed around the earth creating an envelope within which the UA does not affect.  We are within this envelope.

The first does.  The UA is pushing on the bottom of the earth.  The bowshock is pushed around the earth creating an envelope within which the UA does not affect.  We are within this envelope.

The UA is believed to be a form of dark energy.  Bowshocks require some sort of fluid medium in order to form.  To the best of my knowledge, energy does not behave as a fluid.

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 07:28:31 AM

The first does.  The UA is pushing on the bottom of the earth.  The bowshock is pushed around the earth creating an envelope within which the UA does not affect.  We are within this envelope.

The UA is believed to be a form of dark energy.  Bowshocks require some sort of fluid medium in order to form.  To the best of my knowledge, energy does not behave as a fluid.

No, the UA is being fueled supposedly by dark energy.

The UA itself supposedly acts fluidly in this aspect.

It's so cute UA. It behaves exactly as FEs want. Is just like a kind of magic, that helps a stupid theory stand up, and not so well, anyway.
Why UA pushes the earth from "behind" and not from one side or diagonally, making the flat earth twisting?

Quote from: markjo on June 15, 2010, 07:35:29 AM

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 07:28:31 AM

The first does.  The UA is pushing on the bottom of the earth.  The bowshock is pushed around the earth creating an envelope within which the UA does not affect.  We are within this envelope.

The UA is believed to be a form of dark energy.  Bowshocks require some sort of fluid medium in order to form.  To the best of my knowledge, energy does not behave as a fluid.

No, the UA is being fueled supposedly by dark energy.

The UA itself supposedly acts fluidly in this aspect.

So the UA is matter?

Quote from: John Davis on June 20, 2010, 04:54:56 AM

Quote from: markjo on June 15, 2010, 07:35:29 AM

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 07:28:31 AM

The first does.  The UA is pushing on the bottom of the earth.  The bowshock is pushed around the earth creating an envelope within which the UA does not affect.  We are within this envelope.

The UA is believed to be a form of dark energy.  Bowshocks require some sort of fluid medium in order to form.  To the best of my knowledge, energy does not behave as a fluid.

No, the UA is being fueled supposedly by dark energy.

The UA itself supposedly acts fluidly in this aspect.

So the UA is matter?

If it indeed exists, I believe that is what the Cambridge model states.

Quote from: G.Oak on June 21, 2010, 02:18:43 AM

Quote from: John Davis on June 20, 2010, 04:54:56 AM

Quote from: markjo on June 15, 2010, 07:35:29 AM

Quote from: John Davis on June 15, 2010, 07:28:31 AM

The first does.  The UA is pushing on the bottom of the earth.  The bowshock is pushed around the earth creating an envelope within which the UA does not affect.  We are within this envelope.

The UA is believed to be a form of dark energy.  Bowshocks require some sort of fluid medium in order to form.  To the best of my knowledge, energy does not behave as a fluid.

No, the UA is being fueled supposedly by dark energy.

The UA itself supposedly acts fluidly in this aspect.

So the UA is matter?

If it indeed exists, I believe that is what the Cambridge model states.

So the UA beneath the Earth is kind of the wave it's riding on? And the UA beyond the bowshock is accelerating at the same rate in the same direction?