You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!
Since SpaceX is a government contractor (and therefore a member of the conspiracy), I doubt that any FE'er will be impressed.
Well space flight is possible on a flat earth.And the earth will appear round from space according to John Davis.
I imagine it would also smell round, taste round, feel round, and sound round from space, yet still be flat? Zeteticism at its best: "I must ignore what my senses are telling me!"
Quote from: Pseudointellect on June 08, 2010, 05:44:41 AMI imagine it would also smell round, taste round, feel round, and sound round from space, yet still be flat? Zeteticism at its best: "I must ignore what my senses are telling me!"At the edge of space one is looking down at the circular area of light of the sun. This is why there is some slight curvature in amateur balloon pictures.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on June 10, 2010, 11:04:18 AMQuote from: Pseudointellect on June 08, 2010, 05:44:41 AMI imagine it would also smell round, taste round, feel round, and sound round from space, yet still be flat? Zeteticism at its best: "I must ignore what my senses are telling me!"At the edge of space one is looking down at the circular area of light of the sun. This is why there is some slight curvature in amateur balloon pictures.What about space pictures taken of the night side of the earth? Or pictures where the terminator between night and day is visible?Example: http://history.nasa.gov/ap11ann/kippsphotos/6692.jpg
Quote from: General Disarray on June 10, 2010, 11:14:45 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on June 10, 2010, 11:04:18 AMQuote from: Pseudointellect on June 08, 2010, 05:44:41 AMI imagine it would also smell round, taste round, feel round, and sound round from space, yet still be flat? Zeteticism at its best: "I must ignore what my senses are telling me!"At the edge of space one is looking down at the circular area of light of the sun. This is why there is some slight curvature in amateur balloon pictures.What about space pictures taken of the night side of the earth? Or pictures where the terminator between night and day is visible?Example: http://history.nasa.gov/ap11ann/kippsphotos/6692.jpgThat's a NASA picture.
Far in advance of any CG, especially a few decades ago, of course...Oh, of course, to make money NASA invented super-CGI...Why didn't they sell the software afterwards? That would get them more money.
Quote from: BiJane on June 10, 2010, 01:25:56 PMFar in advance of any CG, especially a few decades ago, of course...Oh, of course, to make money NASA invented super-CGI...Why didn't they sell the software afterwards? That would get them more money. I dunno about that. NASA's annual budget is somewhere to the tune of $19 billion or something. A super-CGI program might get them tens of millions, if that.I find it easier to argue the fact that it'd be impossible to keep the Conspiracy a secret... nobody seems to understand that.
Quote from: jackofhearts on June 10, 2010, 02:06:54 PMQuote from: BiJane on June 10, 2010, 01:25:56 PMFar in advance of any CG, especially a few decades ago, of course...Oh, of course, to make money NASA invented super-CGI...Why didn't they sell the software afterwards? That would get them more money. I dunno about that. NASA's annual budget is somewhere to the tune of $19 billion or something. A super-CGI program might get them tens of millions, if that.I find it easier to argue the fact that it'd be impossible to keep the Conspiracy a secret... nobody seems to understand that.If you think of the scientists who made the CGI, they'd want extra payment for the work. they could get, say, a few thousand, million even, each. That's plenty.
Quote from: BiJane on June 10, 2010, 02:08:42 PMQuote from: jackofhearts on June 10, 2010, 02:06:54 PMQuote from: BiJane on June 10, 2010, 01:25:56 PMFar in advance of any CG, especially a few decades ago, of course...Oh, of course, to make money NASA invented super-CGI...Why didn't they sell the software afterwards? That would get them more money. I dunno about that. NASA's annual budget is somewhere to the tune of $19 billion or something. A super-CGI program might get them tens of millions, if that.I find it easier to argue the fact that it'd be impossible to keep the Conspiracy a secret... nobody seems to understand that.If you think of the scientists who made the CGI, they'd want extra payment for the work. they could get, say, a few thousand, million even, each. That's plenty. I feel like you're overestimating the value of advanced CGI technology. The only decent application would be simulators and Hollywood.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds
Quote from: Tom Bishop on June 10, 2010, 11:04:18 AMQuote from: Pseudointellect on June 08, 2010, 05:44:41 AMI imagine it would also smell round, taste round, feel round, and sound round from space, yet still be flat? Zeteticism at its best: "I must ignore what my senses are telling me!"At the edge of space one is looking down at the circular area of light of the sun. This is why there is some slight curvature in amateur balloon pictures.What about space pictures taken of the night side of the earth? Or pictures where the terminator between night and day is visible?Example:
There is evidence for a NASA conspiracy. Please search.
So?
I feel like you're overestimating the value of advanced CGI technology. The only decent application would be simulators and Hollywood.
Quote from: General Disarray on June 10, 2010, 02:04:33 PMSo?It's fake.QuoteI feel like you're overestimating the value of advanced CGI technology. The only decent application would be simulators and Hollywood.It's neither CGI nor computer generated. It's an art studio fake from the Apollo missions. They took images from the edge of space, stitched a couple together horizontally, and used fish-eye effects to add more curvature.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
It's amazing that people still have trouble grasping this.
With your statements, you are claiming that the organization which claims to have taken the image and those like it is committing fraud, which is a very serious offense. Do you have evidence to back up those claims?