Sorry, I thought you were a beeny light specialist? If so, you'll need no explanation of what predictions of beeny light are tested by setting circles - unless, of course, you don't understand what setting circles are or how they work, in which case you should piss off and read up on them. In fact, it's clear you don't understand them or else you'd realise that your request for "data" is as ridiculous as asking for data that if you let go of an object, it falls to the ground.
I don't see any explanations or data in this post. Deriding my understanding of a subject is no way to debate, and is off topic in this forum.
Actually, deriding your understanding of a subject is perfectly sensible in this context because it highlights how your request for "data" is meaningless with regard to setting circles. Or, if you mean deriding your understanding of beeny light, well I'm not the one who claims to be a specialist on a fictional phenomenon, now am I? Since you show no evidence of understanding either beeny light or setting circles, deriding your understanding of both of them appears to be the most sensible option.
BTW you are close to memberating again with your off topic pointing.