# Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.

• 295 Replies
• 49872 Views
?

#### zork

• 3319
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #240 on: July 17, 2010, 02:23:58 AM »
Good argument. However, the reason the Earth looks curved from a high altitude is actually because it is spherical.

Awesome argument. You made so many great points there.

This single post gave more insight to the world as we know it than everything else in this thread combined.
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.

#### Pongo

• Planar Moderator
• 6753
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #241 on: July 17, 2010, 03:08:58 AM »
Good argument. However, the reason the Earth looks curved from a high altitude is actually because it is spherical.

Do you have any proof to support these outlandish claims?

#### markjo

• Content Nazi
• The Elder Ones
• 40289
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #242 on: July 17, 2010, 09:26:08 AM »
Good argument. However, the reason the Earth looks curved from a high altitude is actually because it is spherical.

Do you have any proof to support these outlandish claims?

Is there any proof that you would accept?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

#### Raver

• 777
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #243 on: July 17, 2010, 09:39:00 AM »
Good argument. However, the reason the Earth looks curved from a high altitude is actually because it is spherical.

Do you have any proof to support these outlandish claims?

lurk moar
Quote from: Gen. Douchebag
Quote from: Raver
Why? You a pedo out for delicious loli?
Sure, whatever

#### EnglshGentleman

• Flat Earth Editor
• 9548
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #244 on: July 17, 2010, 09:47:51 PM »
Good argument. However, the reason the Earth looks curved from a high altitude is actually because it is spherical.

Awesome argument. You made so many great points there.

This single post gave more insight to the world as we know it than everything else in this thread combined.
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close? Granted, the look out your window argument is a horrible argument to prove FE, but this is even below that. If you look out and see it is flat, than assume it is flat correct? If you see it is round, why assume it is a sphere? There are plenty of round shapes that aren't spheres. In fact, according to this definition, spheres and balls come after disks and cylinders.

(Dictionary.com)
Quote
round
1.
having a flat, circular surface, as a disk.
2.
ring-shaped, as a hoop.
3.
curved like part of a circle, as an outline.
4.
having a circular cross section, as a cylinder; cylindrical.
5.
spherical or globular, as a ball.
6.
shaped more or less like a part of a sphere; hemispherical.

#### PizzaPlanet

• 12249
• Now available in stereo
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #245 on: July 17, 2010, 10:33:15 PM »
(Dictionary.com)

I'm not saying the definition is wrong, but please don't use shitty sources when it comes to words' definitions. Dictionary.com is known to contain words that don't exist.
hacking your precious forum as we speak

#### EnglshGentleman

• Flat Earth Editor
• 9548
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #246 on: July 17, 2010, 10:42:28 PM »
(Dictionary.com)

I'm not saying the definition is wrong, but please don't use shitty sources when it comes to words' definitions. Dictionary.com is known to contain words that don't exist.

I was actually using the same definition that a certain RE'er used to say that round = sphere. I know there are better sources, but I figured, hey, if RE'ers will use it, why not I?

• 523
• Its a trap!
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #247 on: July 17, 2010, 10:57:09 PM »
(Dictionary.com)

I'm not saying the definition is wrong, but please don't use shitty sources when it comes to words' definitions. Dictionary.com is known to contain words that don't exist.

I was actually using the same definition that a certain RE'er used to say that round = sphere. I know there are better sources, but I figured, hey, if RE'ers will use it, why not I?

Aww its cute, he mentioned me . We were talking semantics, such as if the literal of FLAT EARTH were to be taken in context, then mountain ranges, hills, possible the entirety of what we know as the 3-D world would not exist, such is the same for calling it a ROUND EARTH as you have been so kind as to outline the inaccuracy of such a label, so if you want we can change everything from RE to SE (spherical Earth) and FE to.... PE (Plane Earth?). Please try not to derail the thread.

#### Raver

• 777
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #248 on: July 18, 2010, 02:40:26 AM »
http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0720170#m_en_gb0720170

There you go, a reliable source. Oh wait, I am not sure, maybe it has affiliations with NASA, the goverment or the outside world in general! :O
Quote from: Gen. Douchebag
Quote from: Raver
Why? You a pedo out for delicious loli?
Sure, whatever

?

#### zork

• 3319
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #249 on: July 18, 2010, 09:00:20 PM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.

#### EnglshGentleman

• Flat Earth Editor
• 9548
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #250 on: July 19, 2010, 12:00:52 AM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2010, 12:12:57 AM by EnglshGentleman »

• 523
• Its a trap!
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #251 on: July 19, 2010, 12:03:06 AM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You you even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.

Cool a website picked a random order to address things. How about the more pressing matter that FE was the original belief in the world until it was dis-proven. FE came first, but SE came back and kicked its ass.

#### ClockTower

• 6462
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #252 on: July 19, 2010, 12:03:34 AM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You you even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.
Let's clear up the confusion. The challenge to FET is that the horizon appears 1) lower than eye-level and 2) curved downward (left and right down and center up) in various photographs and eye-witness accounts. RET has an answer, consistent and predictive (RET predicts sunrise time, for example). We've heard that EA solves the problem, but no one can describe EA. Even the FAQ doesn't answer that question. We've heard about magic waves. We've heard that it's just the terminator, a really lame proposal. We've heard that is the conspiracy doctoring all the photographs and forcing Neil Armstrong and his colleagues to lie.

FET fails so miserably in so many ways, but this problem is inherently fatal to FET.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2010, 12:15:26 AM by ClockTower »
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

#### EnglshGentleman

• Flat Earth Editor
• 9548
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #253 on: July 19, 2010, 12:12:26 AM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You you even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.

Cool a website picked a random order to address things.

Dictionaries don't but definitions in random order, they put them in order of most common use or relevance.

?

#### d00gz

• 641
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #254 on: July 19, 2010, 05:01:42 AM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.

If you are on an aircraft at 50,000 feet, you can look out the window and see the earth's curvature. You can then turn 90 degree's, and look out another window, and see the same curvature. Explain how the earth could be a cylinder, having made these observations?

?

#### zork

• 3319
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #255 on: July 19, 2010, 08:01:21 AM »
You even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.
Curved also can mean spherical, so it doesn't matter what else it may point out. Sitting on a VERY BIG whatever shape and looking out of window and seeing flat doesn't mean that the object is flat. So, flat can point out anything. And for me they are arguments of same level. Say whatever you want.
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.

#### EnglshGentleman

• Flat Earth Editor
• 9548
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #256 on: July 19, 2010, 10:15:52 AM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You you even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.
We've heard that EA solves the problem, but no one can describe EA. Even the FAQ doesn't answer that question.

Lurk moar than. Parsec and Parsifal have made countless posts and threads describing and going into the detail the mathematics and physics of EA.

• 523
• Its a trap!
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #257 on: July 19, 2010, 10:32:50 AM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You you even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.

Cool a website picked a random order to address things.

Dictionaries don't but definitions in random order, they put them in order of most common use or relevance.

put*

and according to you that dictionary isn't exactly reliable.

?

#### zork

• 3319
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #258 on: July 19, 2010, 12:54:56 PM »
Lurk moar than. Parsec and Parsifal have made countless posts and threads describing and going into the detail the mathematics and physics of EA.
Which unfortunately does not fit anywhere. There isn't practical way to make light bend or observe it bend as their math and physics supposedly show.
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.

#### Raver

• 777
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #259 on: July 19, 2010, 01:30:02 PM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You you even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.
We've heard that EA solves the problem, but no one can describe EA. Even the FAQ doesn't answer that question.

Lurk moar than. Parsec and Parsifal have made countless posts and threads describing and going into the detail the mathematics and physics of EA.

Lurk moar and you will find that Parsifal admitted to not having any evidence for bendy light and can not explain how the mechanism would work if it did exsist.
Quote from: Gen. Douchebag
Quote from: Raver
Why? You a pedo out for delicious loli?
Sure, whatever

?

#### Thevoiceofreason

• 1792
• Bendy Truth specialist
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #260 on: July 19, 2010, 03:46:19 PM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You you even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.
We've heard that EA solves the problem, but no one can describe EA. Even the FAQ doesn't answer that question.

Lurk moar than. Parsec and Parsifal have made countless posts and threads describing and going into the detail the mathematics and physics of EA.

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Also, he never verified that the light path would allow for sunset and sunrise. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

#### EnglshGentleman

• Flat Earth Editor
• 9548
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #261 on: July 19, 2010, 04:49:43 PM »
Of course it's awesome. It's exactly in same level as FE only "evidence". Look out the window and what you see? Earth is flat so it must be flat.

How is even close?
It has quite same wording and has same amount on great points. Shortly:
1)Earth looks curved so it is spherical.
2)Earth looks flat so it is flat.

You you even read the rest of my post, you'd notice how I pointed out that curved != spherical until the sixth definition.
And in fact, curved pointed towards disks and cylinders first.

Wait, aren't those FE things?
It seems to me that either way, whether you think it is flat, or you think it is curved, it suggests FE before it does SE.
We've heard that EA solves the problem, but no one can describe EA. Even the FAQ doesn't answer that question.

Lurk moar than. Parsec and Parsifal have made countless posts and threads describing and going into the detail the mathematics and physics of EA.

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

#### ClockTower

• 6462
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #262 on: July 19, 2010, 04:53:50 PM »

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

No. Wrong Again. First, no one requires a proof of the mechanism. Second, Newton did describe the force of gravity universally. Third, you'll have to demonstrate to us that he does understand how it functions.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

#### Johannes

• Flat Earth Editor
• 2755
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #263 on: July 19, 2010, 06:53:04 PM »

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

No. Wrong Again. First, no one requires a proof of the mechanism. Second, Newton did describe the force of gravity universally. Third, you'll have to demonstrate to us that he does understand how it functions.
Newton did not understand gravity. Newton was 100% wrong.

#### ClockTower

• 6462
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #264 on: July 19, 2010, 07:00:34 PM »

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

No. Wrong Again. First, no one requires a proof of the mechanism. Second, Newton did describe the force of gravity universally. Third, you'll have to demonstrate to us that he does understand how it functions.
Newton did not understand gravity. Newton was 100% wrong.
1) Did anyone claim that Newton understood gravity? 2) Based on your FET, do tell us how you know that Newton was 100% wrong.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

#### Johannes

• Flat Earth Editor
• 2755
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #265 on: July 19, 2010, 07:30:36 PM »

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

No. Wrong Again. First, no one requires a proof of the mechanism. Second, Newton did describe the force of gravity universally. Third, you'll have to demonstrate to us that he does understand how it functions.
Newton did not understand gravity. Newton was 100% wrong.
1) Did anyone claim that Newton understood gravity? 2) Based on your FET, do tell us how you know that Newton was 100% wrong.
You implied Newton understood gravity.

2. Newton was wrong because objects are not attracted to eachother.

#### ClockTower

• 6462
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #266 on: July 19, 2010, 07:37:33 PM »

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

No. Wrong Again. First, no one requires a proof of the mechanism. Second, Newton did describe the force of gravity universally. Third, you'll have to demonstrate to us that he does understandus how it functions.
Newton did not understand gravity. Newton was 100% wrong.
1) Did anyone claim that Newton understood gravity? 2) Based on your FET, do tell us how you know that Newton was 100% wrong.
You implied Newton understood gravity.

2. Newton was wrong because objects are not attracted to eachother.
Where did I imply that?

2. You're obviously wrong. Objects are attracted to each other.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

#### Johannes

• Flat Earth Editor
• 2755
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #267 on: July 19, 2010, 10:02:09 PM »

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

No. Wrong Again. First, no one requires a proof of the mechanism. Second, Newton did describe the force of gravity universally. Third, you'll have to demonstrate to us that he does understandus how it functions.
Newton did not understand gravity. Newton was 100% wrong.
1) Did anyone claim that Newton understood gravity? 2) Based on your FET, do tell us how you know that Newton was 100% wrong.
You implied Newton understood gravity.

2. Newton was wrong because objects are not attracted to eachother.
Where did I imply that?

2. You're obviously wrong. Objects are attracted to each other.
Provide proof of electrically neutral objects being attracted to each other.

• 523
• Its a trap!
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #268 on: July 19, 2010, 10:11:27 PM »

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

No. Wrong Again. First, no one requires a proof of the mechanism. Second, Newton did describe the force of gravity universally. Third, you'll have to demonstrate to us that he does understandus how it functions.
Newton did not understand gravity. Newton was 100% wrong.
1) Did anyone claim that Newton understood gravity? 2) Based on your FET, do tell us how you know that Newton was 100% wrong.
You implied Newton understood gravity.

2. Newton was wrong because objects are not attracted to eachother.
Where did I imply that?

2. You're obviously wrong. Objects are attracted to each other.
Provide proof of electrically neutral objects being attracted to each other.

My high school physics teacher did an experiment that proved they are 0.o.

^ this explains the idea
« Last Edit: July 19, 2010, 10:30:21 PM by AdmiralAckbar »

#### EnglshGentleman

• Flat Earth Editor
• 9548
##### Re: Why The Earth Appears Curved at a High Altitude.
« Reply #269 on: July 19, 2010, 10:51:55 PM »

No they haven't. Parsifal just gave us one BS equation that basically said, derp light moves here. what he failed to do was describe the actual forces behind it, i.e. the location and nature of the force. Finally, he never explained how the force acted upon the light not only mattered for the position, but the velocity of the photon as well.

So what? Just because he can't prove the mechanism behind it, doesn't mean he can't understand how it functions. I'm pretty sure RE'ers do the exact same thing for gravity.

No. Wrong Again. First, no one requires a proof of the mechanism. Second, Newton did describe the force of gravity universally. Third, you'll have to demonstrate to us that he does understandus how it functions.
Newton did not understand gravity. Newton was 100% wrong.
1) Did anyone claim that Newton understood gravity? 2) Based on your FET, do tell us how you know that Newton was 100% wrong.
You implied Newton understood gravity.

2. Newton was wrong because objects are not attracted to eachother.
Where did I imply that?

2. You're obviously wrong. Objects are attracted to each other.
Provide proof of electrically neutral objects being attracted to each other.

My high school physics teacher did an experiment that proved they are 0.o.

^ this explains the idea

Your high school physics teacher was teaching entanglement!?

I thought there was only a dozen or so people in the world that fully understand how it works.
That's incredible!