feedback wanted

  • 9 Replies
  • 986 Views
feedback wanted
« on: July 04, 2010, 05:47:20 PM »
It is obvious that there are several FE believers are extremely smart people.  Are any of you using your intellect for something other than debunking RE beliefs? 

It seems like a waste, if not.

I've read a few posts asking you for photographic evidence of the "ice wall."  The only one I've seen (and I apologize if there are more I missed) was obviously not this wall you speak of.

Would it be unfair to ask you to provide this?  The responses to this question I've read, state that it would be too expensive, which, although I disagree with, will have to accept.,

Wouldn't this extraordinary proof not only pay for itself, but allow you to reap monetary benefits for years to come?

Pretty awesome discovery, wouldn't you say?

The only thing I can gather from the lack of photo graphical evidence is that you don't really believe in FE and are using this forum as some sort of sociological experiment.

I appreciate any feedback.


*

Lorddave

  • 15835
Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2010, 06:10:44 PM »
All attempts to go to the ice wall by one person on one day  (John Davis) was turned away.
Thus, no photographic evidence could exist.

Also, some believe there is no ice wall and that the Earth is an infinite plain.  And, let's not forget, photographic evidence is not valid proof here.

Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2010, 07:19:57 PM »
Other FE believers wouldn't accept the photo?  What about John Davis?  Would he not believe his own picture (not to mention his own two eyes)?

I don't follow.

Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2010, 07:36:39 PM »
Other FE believers wouldn't accept the photo?  What about John Davis?  Would he not believe his own picture (not to mention his own two eyes)?

I don't follow.
While I don't know, I surmise that FEers realized that all was lost with the first photos from high altitude crafts. So they embarked on a two-prong attack to save their fantasy from destruction by the onslaught of reality.

One, they invented a unfalsifiable theory that some organization fakes anything that would prove 'uncomfortable' for them, like the Moon landings.

Two, they decided to declare, for no good reason, that photos do not constitute valid proof. Of course, it's like one basketball team saying your baskets don't count if you're wearing shoes, but our baskets count even when we're wearing our shoes.

Quote
Q: "How did NASA create these images with the computer technology available at the time?"

A: NASA did not send rockets into space; instead, they spent a fraction of their funding on developing increasingly advanced computers and imaging software to cover their lies.

PLEASE NOTE: This means that pictures confirming the roundness or flatness of the Earth DO NOT CONSTITUTE VALID PROOF.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

Lorddave

  • 15835
Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2010, 08:14:27 PM »
Other FE believers wouldn't accept the photo?  What about John Davis?  Would he not believe his own picture (not to mention his own two eyes)?

I don't follow.

Oh they would, so long as it supports FE.  Everything else, however, is an illusion or forgery.

Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2010, 08:40:39 PM »
Wouldn't their theory be a lot easier to validate if someone actually saw it and photographed it as opposed to painstakingly debating the same topics over and over again on a message board?

Until I hear a reasonable response as to why there is not a photograph (or attempt of), I question the validity of the website and FE believers.




*

Lorddave

  • 15835
Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2010, 08:41:45 PM »
Wouldn't their theory be a lot easier to validate if someone actually saw it and photographed it as opposed to painstakingly debating the same topics over and over again on a message board?

Until I hear a reasonable response as to why there is not a photograph (or attempt of), I question the validity of the website and FE believers.

There isn't one.  The only one is "conspiracy".

Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2010, 06:55:42 PM »
I see now what is going on here, after reading of the Duhem-Quine Theorem and W.G. Voliva's article in Modern Mechanics (among others).

Now I'm not sure what is worse, believing the earth is flat or pretending the earth is flat and debating it with people on a message board.

I think I'll go with the latter. 

I would entertain a new hobby.  Pretty ridiculous.


*

Lorddave

  • 15835
Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2010, 07:08:15 PM »
I see now what is going on here, after reading of the Duhem-Quine Theorem and W.G. Voliva's article in Modern Mechanics (among others).

Now I'm not sure what is worse, believing the earth is flat or pretending the earth is flat and debating it with people on a message board.

I think I'll go with the latter. 

I would entertain a new hobby.  Pretty ridiculous.



Steve's debating skills, apparently, caused him great fame with himself in a debate.

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: feedback wanted
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2010, 11:25:30 PM »
What's the point of trolling in general?
why do people like to post xxx where's your god now?
for the lulz