No, on the contrary, I do not think you will find a single illogical argument by a Flat Earther, as we are highly versed in logic. Are you instead trying to accuse our premises of being false? I assure you our arguments themselves are valid.
This seriously made me laugh! Amazed, meet the greatest troll on the site. James, here, says he doesn't think you will find a single illogical argument by a Flat Earther, yet he himself has argued that not only is the moon alive, but is eating itself. He's also argued that the "craters" we see on the moon are actually migrating lifeforms. He has no proof of this, nor will he do any real research on the subject, but somehow, in the above quote, calims this to be a logical argument.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
James is really playing with words, or doing cheap philosophy, if you prefer. In logic, whether the classical variety (ponendo ponens, tolendo tolens, etc.) or the mathematical one, the proposition is assumed true, There is no room for real life in logic, where absolute truth is impossible to spot.
It is easy to make strong-sounding claims, like:
- "every one of my grandchildren has been abducted by aliens" (I have no grandchildren),
- "science is wrong" (scientists are not even pretending to be absolutely right),
- "GPS without satellites is possible" (it is possible, but astonishingly expensive, therefore not feasible to the scale GPS is installed),
- "science is just a branch of a branch of philosophy (empiricism), so its findings could be overturned by any other branch of philosophy" (true, but not has not yet happened in any significant way).
In practice, where solid science is applicable the word games with logic are frequently right, but irrelevant.