...And the thread is back.
We are all desperately trying to make sense of birds pulling planes, fish pulling boats, and we do not simply let the thread shine by its own stupidity and die.
Please do not feed the trolls.
I find it ironic that it is the people that are opposed to this thread that keep bumping it.
I find it sad that the very few posts that even mention evolution in a thread about evolution is minimal. Not even 30 out of some 360. And of those, the key elements of evolution, like mutations and natural selection, are rarer still.
So it is important that people see how the trolls overtake discussions, so other, less contaminated threads may be saved.
It's not my fault, nor an indicator of the integrity of the idea, that my opposition cannot coherently formulate a reply within the context of evolutionary terms.
Why do your birds fly so high? Even on a FE the shortest route would be low to the ground. Your arguing with flase premises which is a fallacy.
You claim that birds fly high -
TrueYou claim that shortest point from A to B is achieved by flying low rather than high (on a RE) -
TrueYou claim that on a flat earth altitude doesn't make a difference to the distance-
FalseWith your arguments and premises the world ought to be concave, let me demonstrate:
As you can see the high altitude route is only the shortest route on the concave earth, therefor with your arguments, your conclusion should be that the earth is not round, nor flat but instead concave.