Slivers ban was uncalled for

  • 43 Replies
  • 11748 Views
*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Slivers ban was uncalled for
« on: May 12, 2010, 09:35:09 AM »
Because I'm not sure if people still haven't been given the right to complain, I'll be starting this in the hopes that I can at least change his ban.


The thread in question is this one:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=38823.80

First of all, I don't know for how long the ban is. I suppose it's justified to give him one day or just a few hours to calm down. Anything more and it's much uncalled for and IMO not justifiable.

In the very same thread we see this kind of behavior from Ichi, it has since been edited by Jack to make it much much smaller(I think he originally used the biggest font size). Notice something missing? If not, read closely: He was not warned at all, even when a moderator found it neccesary to edit his post.
In light of this, I don't think banning Sliver should've happened, especially when you see the likes of Levee posting this:
Quote
gdissaray, your neurons must be full of crap...to believe that 1 billion trillion tons of water stay glued next to a spherical surface which flies through space at 107000 km/hr, means that you too can be accused of illegally carrying a brain inside your skull. Perhaps those three years you spent in first grade were not nearly enough to remove the crap from your mind...

These are personal attacks using swear words and at the same time flaming/harassing along with troublemaking(read site rules for the very definition of these)

You'll notice that Levee is continually using denigrating attacks. Notice something missing again? Probably, but I'll spell it out for you: He has not been warned by anyone either. The fact that his attacks are personal as well unlike Sliver who simply used profanity to put emphasis on the following word, makes Slivers ban even more questionable.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2010, 10:25:18 AM by Catchpa »
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2010, 09:51:51 AM »
I have also noticed that FES do not get warned for the same sort of behavior that we get warned for, and you cited a great example there.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2010, 09:55:18 AM »
I have also noticed that FES do not get warned for the same sort of behavior that we get warned for, and you cited a great example there.

While this is topic is not about discrimination, you certainly do have a point. Though I wish to keep this on the three individuals mentioned, and perhaps more if there's evidence for that.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24186
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2010, 09:59:50 AM »
Silver swore, James warned him, he repeated the same behavior in the upper forums.

Why was this uncalled for?

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2010, 10:03:00 AM »
Silver swore, James warned him, he repeated the same behavior in the upper forums.

Why was this uncalled for?

Read original post perhaps. I am explaining why, though if you wish clarification on something more specific, do tell.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2010, 10:04:56 AM by Catchpa »
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24186
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2010, 10:09:10 AM »
Silver swore, James warned him, he repeated the same behavior in the upper forums.

Why was this uncalled for?

Read original post perhaps. I am explaining why, though if you wish clarification on something more specific, do tell.
I read your post. Now i bolded the part that needs clarification.

?

Eddy Baby

  • Official Member
  • 9986
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2010, 10:11:54 AM »
You're obviously right, but I feel the need to argue.

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2010, 10:12:18 AM »
I bolded the part in my OP saying this.

Because I'm not sure if people still haven't been given the right to complain, I'll be starting this in the hopes that I can at least change his ban.


The thread in question is this one:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=38823.80

First of all, I don't know for how long the ban is. I suppose it's justified to give him one day or just a few hours to calm down. Anything more and it's much uncalled for and IMO not justifiable.

In the very same thread we see this kind of behavior from Ichi, it has since been edited by Jack to make it much much smaller(I think he originally used the biggest font size). Notice something missing? If not, read closely: He was not warned at all, even when a moderator found it neccesary to edit his post.
In light of this, I don't think banning Sliver should've happened, especially when you see the likes of Levee posting this:
Quote
gdissaray, your neurons must be full of crap...to believe that 1 billion trillion tons of water stay glued next to a spherical surface which flies through space at 107000 km/hr, means that you too can be accused of illegally carrying a brain inside your skull. Perhaps those three years you spent in first grade were not nearly enough to remove the crap from your mind...

These are personal attacks using swear words and at the same time flaming/harassing along with troublemaking(read site rules for the very definition of these)

You'll notice that Levee is continually using denigrating attacks. Notice something missing again? Probably, but I'll spell it out for you: He has not been warned by anyone either. The fact that his attacks are personal as well unlike Sliver who simply used profanity to put emphasis on the following word, makes Slivers ban even more questionable.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2010, 10:15:27 AM by Catchpa »
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

SupahLovah

  • 5167
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #8 on: May 12, 2010, 10:18:14 AM »
Catchpa, lrn2link.
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #9 on: May 12, 2010, 10:23:57 AM »
As per standard moderating procedure, I warned Sliver after his first rule transgression. After he contravened the warning only a few days later, he was banned.

Nor was this an isolated incident, in reviewing his posting history I have noticed a trend of low-content posting and abuse. I am completely justified in my decision, and in following site procedure, which I have been enforcing systematically for the last 3 years.

Members should be aware that those who use profane or abusive language in the main discussion forums do so at their own risk. Ordinances against profane language and low-content posting exist on the site, and those who receive official warnings should not be surprised if they face bans when these warnings are ignored.

Regards,

James
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2010, 10:28:36 AM »
You did not account for both Levee's and Ichi's posting. If they are not facing bans nor warnings, why is Sliver?
Also, I fixed the links.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24186
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #11 on: May 12, 2010, 10:40:34 AM »
I didn't see profanity in the examples you gave.

James wins again.

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #12 on: May 12, 2010, 10:42:43 AM »
Note that I did not explicitly state that it was only swear words, though crap is most definately one.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24186
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #13 on: May 12, 2010, 11:06:59 AM »
But Silver was banned for profanity, with a history of low content posts in the main discussion boards.

 I am not following you.

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #14 on: May 12, 2010, 11:11:43 AM »
But Silver was banned for profanity, with a history of low content posts in the main discussion boards.

 I am not following you.

What the others did was worse.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8931
  • Semper vigilans
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #15 on: May 12, 2010, 11:31:02 AM »
You did not account for both Levee's and Ichi's posting. If they are not facing bans nor warnings, why is Sliver?
Also, I fixed the links.
When have I ever insulted someone or used profane language? That thread is basically everyone else trying to call me stupid and saying I fail. Instead of calling you all "idiots" or dumb, I plainly stick to the argument instead of the low-content posts present.
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24186
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #16 on: May 12, 2010, 11:32:14 AM »
But Silver was banned for profanity, with a history of low content posts in the main discussion boards.

 I am not following you.

What the others did was worse.
Incorrect, as noted by James lack of banning them

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #17 on: May 12, 2010, 11:40:29 AM »
You did not account for both Levee's and Ichi's posting. If they are not facing bans nor warnings, why is Sliver?
Also, I fixed the links.
When have I ever insulted someone or used profane language?

I never said you did, but you were clearly going against the rules as the edit made by Jack shows. If it gives warnings to say "fuck" a single time, so should deliberately taking up space with unnecessary huge letters which is nothing more than an annoyance and direct troublemaking.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35374
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2010, 11:57:35 AM »
I'm a little confused as to whether the ban was for low-content posting, or simply saying the word "fuck" in a serious forum. :-\

Also, if it's the latter, am I allowed to say it here when we're discussing the use of the word, like the way I just did in the line above?  Do we have to refer to the word by something stupid like "the f-bomb"?  Or are Catchpa and I about to get banned because we just used the word?

*

SupahLovah

  • 5167
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2010, 12:25:49 PM »
You guys are so fucked, you can't just drop "the f-bomb" like that in a serious board!
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24186
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #20 on: May 12, 2010, 12:29:26 PM »
  Or are Catchpa and I about to get banned because we just used the word?
One can only hope.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #21 on: May 12, 2010, 01:42:55 PM »
I'm a little confused as to whether the ban was for low-content posting, or simply saying the word "fuck" in a serious forum. :-\

Also, if it's the latter, am I allowed to say it here when we're discussing the use of the word, like the way I just did in the line above?  Do we have to refer to the word by something stupid like "the f-bomb"?  Or are Catchpa and I about to get banned because we just used the word?

No Saddam, you don't need to worry. In fact, that is precisely why bans for profane or low-content posts are not hard-and-fast rules, but are at moderator discretion. The difference between this kind of discussion and the drivel which Sliver has been posting should be obvious.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #22 on: May 12, 2010, 01:53:25 PM »
saying the word "fuck" in a serious forum.

Doesn't that get you a Rory award?
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

?

Crustinator

  • 7813
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #23 on: May 12, 2010, 04:29:10 PM »
Because I'm not sure if people still haven't been given the right to complain, I'll be starting this in the hopes that I can at least change his ban.

You don't understand how TFES works.

1) Set troll bait
2) Wait for fury
3) Ban furious noob
4) Reset trap and repeat

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6258
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #24 on: May 12, 2010, 08:41:11 PM »
Thank you, Mr. McIntyre. Thanks to Dann, too. 

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #25 on: May 12, 2010, 10:07:35 PM »
Thank you, Mr. McIntyre. Thanks to Dann, too. 

Nice to see you Mrs Peach.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Pongo

  • Planar Moderator
  • 6758
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #26 on: May 13, 2010, 12:50:11 AM »
I have also noticed that FES do not get warned for the same sort of behavior that we get warned for, and you cited a great example there.

This is untrue, I've been banned several times.

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24186
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #27 on: May 13, 2010, 03:07:55 AM »
Thank you, Mr. McIntyre. Thanks to Dann, too. 

Nice to see you Mrs Peach.

I love her. Back off.  ;)

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #28 on: May 13, 2010, 03:10:25 AM »
I love her. Back off.  ;)

I love her moar.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24186
Re: Slivers ban was uncalled for
« Reply #29 on: May 13, 2010, 03:14:36 AM »
Untrue. You aren't even capable of recognizing love.