I gave you proof, prove that its not, sources that benifit me that give reasons why i'm right that use science.
None of them gave any reasons for why you are right, they simply stated it to be so without any further justification. This is all very well if you're just trying to find out what the accepted theories are, but it doesn't actually
prove anything. They also don't use science because science is a method of investigation based on observation, and none of the sources you provided had any relation to the scientific method, which should include analyses of the validity and reliability of the observations used. They just stated conclusions as if they were fact.
And do I have to prove something that every person who is aware of the 23.5 degree tilt should know?
Ah, now you've hit upon a feature unique to RET. If you can prove that the Earth has an axis of rotation, and that this axial tilt is what causes the seasons, rather than the Sun moving around above it, you will have satisfied the proof that I asked for.