Antimoon?!?!?!

Not nearly as stubborn as FE'ers.  I asked you in that thread, what you thought I meant, but you have yet to respond.

Sometimes I get bored when I have to keep explaining the same thing over and over again.  I decided to give up because it clearly wasn't getting through.

Quote from: Sliver on April 30, 2010, 04:51:53 PM

Not nearly as stubborn as FE'ers.  I asked you in that thread, what you thought I meant, but you have yet to respond.

Sometimes I get bored when I have to keep explaining the same thing over and over again.  I decided to give up because it clearly wasn't getting through.

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 30, 2010, 04:59:59 PM

Quote from: Sliver on April 30, 2010, 04:51:53 PM

Not nearly as stubborn as FE'ers.  I asked you in that thread, what you thought I meant, but you have yet to respond.

Sometimes I get bored when I have to keep explaining the same thing over and over again.  I decided to give up because it clearly wasn't getting through.

Perhaps your explanations are inadequate.

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

I've studied the sky carefully. I went to Earth Science. They taught us about the sky a little, and we had to look up at the sky to find Polaris and some major constellations. Nowhere did I find a black spot in the sky.

Quote from: Rahimz on May 05, 2010, 03:56:31 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

I've studied the sky carefully. I went to Earth Science. They taught us about the sky a little, and we had to look up at the sky to find Polaris and some major constellations. Nowhere did I find a black spot in the sky.

Earth Science sounds like a hotbed of globularist lies. You should study the sky independently. Do not allow the brainwashing effects of the conspiracy to guide your investigations.

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

James, you are IGNORING the FACT that the people who study the sky most carefully - professional and amateur astronomers, William Herschel, Patrick Moore, Clyde Tombaugh, David Malin and countless others - not a single one of these has EVER reported seeing anything resembling this object, yet they managed to pick out tiny, dim objects invisible to the naked eye such as several hundred asteroids, Pluto, Eris and so on. Yet they all miss, without exception, a black disc the size of the Moon blotting out the stars as it travels across the sky.
You'd make me laugh if I didn't worry you really believed your own tales.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 05, 2010, 04:38:11 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

James, you are IGNORING the FACT that the people who study the sky most carefully - professional and amateur astronomers, William Herschel, Patrick Moore, Clyde Tombaugh, David Malin and countless others - not a single one of these has EVER reported seeing anything resembling this object, yet they managed to pick out tiny, dim objects invisible to the naked eye such as several hundred asteroids, Pluto, Eris and so on. Yet they all miss, without exception, a black disc the size of the Moon blotting out the stars as it travels across the sky.
You'd make me laugh if I didn't worry you really believed your own tales.

Then it shows that they have not, in fact, been as observant as you appear to believe (or that they are globular fundamentalists, or both).

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 04:42:42 PM

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 05, 2010, 04:38:11 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

James, you are IGNORING the FACT that the people who study the sky most carefully - professional and amateur astronomers, William Herschel, Patrick Moore, Clyde Tombaugh, David Malin and countless others - not a single one of these has EVER reported seeing anything resembling this object, yet they managed to pick out tiny, dim objects invisible to the naked eye such as several hundred asteroids, Pluto, Eris and so on. Yet they all miss, without exception, a black disc the size of the Moon blotting out the stars as it travels across the sky.
You'd make me laugh if I didn't worry you really believed your own tales.

Then it shows that they have not, in fact, been as observant as you appear to believe (or that they are globular fundamentalists, or both).

So your basically saying they are all wrong and that you are right,despite lack of a third party source.
Pray tell,why should anyone on this site believe you?

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: The Question1 on May 05, 2010, 04:47:46 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 04:42:42 PM

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 05, 2010, 04:38:11 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

James, you are IGNORING the FACT that the people who study the sky most carefully - professional and amateur astronomers, William Herschel, Patrick Moore, Clyde Tombaugh, David Malin and countless others - not a single one of these has EVER reported seeing anything resembling this object, yet they managed to pick out tiny, dim objects invisible to the naked eye such as several hundred asteroids, Pluto, Eris and so on. Yet they all miss, without exception, a black disc the size of the Moon blotting out the stars as it travels across the sky.
You'd make me laugh if I didn't worry you really believed your own tales.

Then it shows that they have not, in fact, been as observant as you appear to believe (or that they are globular fundamentalists, or both).

So your basically saying they are all wrong and that you are right,despite lack of a third party source.
Pray tell,why should anyone on this site believe you?

Because they can look for themselves. If Stephen Hawking told you that 2 + 2 = 5, would you believe him?

Quote from: The Question1 on May 05, 2010, 04:47:46 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 04:42:42 PM

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 05, 2010, 04:38:11 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

James, you are IGNORING the FACT that the people who study the sky most carefully - professional and amateur astronomers, William Herschel, Patrick Moore, Clyde Tombaugh, David Malin and countless others - not a single one of these has EVER reported seeing anything resembling this object, yet they managed to pick out tiny, dim objects invisible to the naked eye such as several hundred asteroids, Pluto, Eris and so on. Yet they all miss, without exception, a black disc the size of the Moon blotting out the stars as it travels across the sky.
You'd make me laugh if I didn't worry you really believed your own tales.

Then it shows that they have not, in fact, been as observant as you appear to believe (or that they are globular fundamentalists, or both).

So your basically saying they are all wrong and that you are right,despite lack of a third party source.
Pray tell,why should anyone on this site believe you?

Because they can look for themselves. If Stephen Hawking told you that 2 + 2 = 5, would you believe him?

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 04:50:10 PM

Quote from: The Question1 on May 05, 2010, 04:47:46 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 04:42:42 PM

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 05, 2010, 04:38:11 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

James, you are IGNORING the FACT that the people who study the sky most carefully - professional and amateur astronomers, William Herschel, Patrick Moore, Clyde Tombaugh, David Malin and countless others - not a single one of these has EVER reported seeing anything resembling this object, yet they managed to pick out tiny, dim objects invisible to the naked eye such as several hundred asteroids, Pluto, Eris and so on. Yet they all miss, without exception, a black disc the size of the Moon blotting out the stars as it travels across the sky.
You'd make me laugh if I didn't worry you really believed your own tales.

Then it shows that they have not, in fact, been as observant as you appear to believe (or that they are globular fundamentalists, or both).

So your basically saying they are all wrong and that you are right,despite lack of a third party source.
Pray tell,why should anyone on this site believe you?

Because they can look for themselves. If Stephen Hawking told you that 2 + 2 = 5, would you believe him?

I can use a number line to prove that its wrong.
I however,can not see stars as it is in New York.All the other times where i have been out of the country i haven't seen any patch of sky that didn't have stars in it.
Again,why would anyone believe it exisits without a 3rd party source?

Quote from: The Question1 on May 05, 2010, 04:47:46 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 04:42:42 PM

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

Ya' know there are these magical new devices called "Cameras" that might help support your case. You might even be able to tell me how the "antimoon" has failed to be shown, explained, or proven considering that a signifcant portion of the night sky would be covered up and somebody - somewhere would notice. Considering the ancient Greeks took the time to make up the constellations -and not reference anything like an "antimoon," I must either label you foolish.... or a troll.

How would a photograph of the Antimoon look different from a photograph of a patch of empty sky?

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 05, 2010, 04:38:11 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 03:51:45 PM

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.

James, you are IGNORING the FACT that the people who study the sky most carefully - professional and amateur astronomers, William Herschel, Patrick Moore, Clyde Tombaugh, David Malin and countless others - not a single one of these has EVER reported seeing anything resembling this object, yet they managed to pick out tiny, dim objects invisible to the naked eye such as several hundred asteroids, Pluto, Eris and so on. Yet they all miss, without exception, a black disc the size of the Moon blotting out the stars as it travels across the sky.
You'd make me laugh if I didn't worry you really believed your own tales.

Then it shows that they have not, in fact, been as observant as you appear to believe (or that they are globular fundamentalists, or both).

So your basically saying they are all wrong and that you are right,despite lack of a third party source.
Pray tell,why should anyone on this site believe you?

Because they can look for themselves. If Stephen Hawking told you that 2 + 2 = 5, would you believe him?

I predict he'll get into another ranting rave about how dangerous moonlight is, and how he'd have to be crazy to expose himself to it long enough to make any such measurements.

Quote from: Ellipsis on May 05, 2010, 07:41:28 PM

I predict he'll get into another ranting rave about how dangerous moonlight is, and how he'd have to be crazy to expose himself to it long enough to make any such measurements.

Oh yeah, the moon is really dangerous. Please, I more worried about getting hit by a brick flung out of an airplane than the "hazardous" effects from moonlight.

Quote from: Death-T on May 05, 2010, 07:47:38 PM

Quote from: Ellipsis on May 05, 2010, 07:41:28 PM

I predict he'll get into another ranting rave about how dangerous moonlight is, and how he'd have to be crazy to expose himself to it long enough to make any such measurements.

Oh yeah, the moon is really dangerous. Please, I more worried about getting hit by a brick flung out of an airplane than the "hazardous" effects from moonlight.

I have a theory.

What if James is confusing the Moon with the Sun?  After all, we know prolonged exposure to sunlight is dangerous and deadly to humans.

If Stephen Hawking told you that 2 + 2 = 5, would you believe him?

I have seen it. The only reason you have not seen it is because you have not studied the sky carefully enough.