Antimoon?!?!?!

  • 209 Replies
  • 54336 Views
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #120 on: April 28, 2010, 01:56:37 PM »
But where is your evidence that this object exists at all?  I mean, if it was up there, at some point we would see it, even during the day, just like we can the moon.  Either post proof of this object or, just admit you have none.

what happens with eclipses?!
Your post just made me think of another few questions for the FE'ers.  I'll number them so you guys don't miss any.

1.  What is the size of the antimoon, how far away is it, and exactly how does it cover the sun and moon in an eclipse?  
2.  Does it touch the surface of the sun or moon?  
3.  Does it float in front of it?  
4.  How far apart are they during the eclipse?  
5.  And how did you figure all this out?

Come on, John!  Try answering these 5 questions.
I don't believe in the antimoon and know little about the published theories on it.
I.f you can't rgue both sides, youu understand neither

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #121 on: April 28, 2010, 02:57:27 PM »
But where is your evidence that this object exists at all?  I mean, if it was up there, at some point we would see it, even during the day, just like we can the moon.  Either post proof of this object or, just admit you have none.

what happens with eclipses?!
Your post just made me think of another few questions for the FE'ers.  I'll number them so you guys don't miss any.

1.  What is the size of the antimoon, how far away is it, and exactly how does it cover the sun and moon in an eclipse?  
2.  Does it touch the surface of the sun or moon?  
3.  Does it float in front of it?  
4.  How far apart are they during the eclipse?  
5.  And how did you figure all this out?

Come on, John!  Try answering these 5 questions.
I don't believe in the antimoon and know little about the published theories on it.

Ok, this just proves that the antimoon doesn't exist. thanks, john davis, now i dont have to buy  a camera or wire money
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

The Question1

  • 390
  • +0/-0
  • Your logic is inferior to my logic.
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #122 on: April 28, 2010, 02:59:24 PM »
I see people go outside all the time,they seem to be in perfect health.
Also,if its widely known you can provide a link right?
« Last Edit: April 28, 2010, 03:01:17 PM by The Question1 »

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #123 on: April 28, 2010, 03:12:41 PM »
But where is your evidence that this object exists at all?  I mean, if it was up there, at some point we would see it, even during the day, just like we can the moon.  Either post proof of this object or, just admit you have none.

what happens with eclipses?!
Your post just made me think of another few questions for the FE'ers.  I'll number them so you guys don't miss any.

1.  What is the size of the antimoon, how far away is it, and exactly how does it cover the sun and moon in an eclipse?  
2.  Does it touch the surface of the sun or moon?  
3.  Does it float in front of it?  
4.  How far apart are they during the eclipse?  
5.  And how did you figure all this out?

Come on, John!  Try answering these 5 questions.
I don't believe in the antimoon and know little about the published theories on it.

Ok, this just proves that the antimoon doesn't exist. thanks, john davis, now i dont have to buy  a camera or wire money
My beliefs prove that the antimoon doesn't exist?
 ::)
I.f you can't rgue both sides, youu understand neither

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #124 on: April 28, 2010, 03:39:49 PM »
James, you claimed that the moon caused blindness or even DEATH, from the title of those books it doesnt appear to invovle that but instead mental degeneration. I would like to see the claims of blindness and death, and if so could you give me a qoute from said sources. Please, of course.

Its common knowledge.  The English navy even made regulations concerning it.

Its common knowledge that the earth is round.  Several nations even built space agencies using that premise.  So much for common knowledge.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #125 on: April 28, 2010, 03:51:30 PM »
James, you claimed that the moon caused blindness or even DEATH, from the title of those books it doesnt appear to invovle that but instead mental degeneration. I would like to see the claims of blindness and death, and if so could you give me a qoute from said sources. Please, of course.

Its common knowledge.  The English navy even made regulations concerning it.

Its common knowledge that the earth is round.  Several nations even built space agencies using that premise.  So much for common knowledge.
Indeed!  However, what I meant was it should be easily researchable if the poster was interested.  I could even go to the used bookstore here (though it is rather large) and find books on the moons effects.  Now this doesn't mean they are valid, but it is easy to find the sources.
I.f you can't rgue both sides, youu understand neither

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #126 on: April 28, 2010, 04:48:02 PM »
James, you claimed that the moon caused blindness or even DEATH, from the title of those books it doesnt appear to invovle that but instead mental degeneration. I would like to see the claims of blindness and death, and if so could you give me a qoute from said sources. Please, of course.

Its common knowledge.  The English navy even made regulations concerning it.

Its common knowledge that the earth is round.  Several nations even built space agencies using that premise.  So much for common knowledge.
Indeed!  However, what I meant was it should be easily researchable if the poster was interested.  I could even go to the used bookstore here (though it is rather large) and find books on the moons effects.  Now this doesn't mean they are valid, but it is easy to find the sources.
From what I've heard, research on the psychological and physiological effects of moonlight have yielded mixed results.  Some studies suggest that there is indeed an effect while others are inconclusive.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #127 on: April 28, 2010, 05:08:04 PM »
James, you claimed that the moon caused blindness or even DEATH, from the title of those books it doesnt appear to invovle that but instead mental degeneration. I would like to see the claims of blindness and death, and if so could you give me a qoute from said sources. Please, of course.

Its common knowledge.  The English navy even made regulations concerning it.

Its common knowledge that the earth is round.  Several nations even built space agencies using that premise.  So much for common knowledge.
Indeed!  However, what I meant was it should be easily researchable if the poster was interested.  I could even go to the used bookstore here (though it is rather large) and find books on the moons effects.  Now this doesn't mean they are valid, but it is easy to find the sources.
From what I've heard, research on the psychological and physiological effects of moonlight have yielded mixed results.  Some studies suggest that there is indeed an effect while others are inconclusive.
Yes, we have no negative results yet have inconclusive results and positive results.
I.f you can't rgue both sides, youu understand neither

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #128 on: April 28, 2010, 06:29:10 PM »
But where is your evidence that this object exists at all?  I mean, if it was up there, at some point we would see it, even during the day, just like we can the moon.  Either post proof of this object or, just admit you have none.

what happens with eclipses?!
Your post just made me think of another few questions for the FE'ers.  I'll number them so you guys don't miss any.

1.  What is the size of the antimoon, how far away is it, and exactly how does it cover the sun and moon in an eclipse?  
2.  Does it touch the surface of the sun or moon?  
3.  Does it float in front of it?  
4.  How far apart are they during the eclipse?  
5.  And how did you figure all this out?

Come on, John!  Try answering these 5 questions.
I don't believe in the antimoon and know little about the published theories on it.

Ok, this just proves that the antimoon doesn't exist. thanks, john davis, now i dont have to buy  a camera or wire money
My beliefs prove that the antimoon doesn't exist?
 ::)


Yep. Because James is having a mental breakdown (he is really a werewolf). And he thinks the antimoon is true and that the moon messes you up
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

Sliver

  • 557
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #129 on: April 28, 2010, 07:15:16 PM »
But where is your evidence that this object exists at all?  I mean, if it was up there, at some point we would see it, even during the day, just like we can the moon.  Either post proof of this object or, just admit you have none.

what happens with eclipses?!
Your post just made me think of another few questions for the FE'ers.  I'll number them so you guys don't miss any.

1.  What is the size of the antimoon, how far away is it, and exactly how does it cover the sun and moon in an eclipse?  
2.  Does it touch the surface of the sun or moon?  
3.  Does it float in front of it?  
4.  How far apart are they during the eclipse?  
5.  And how did you figure all this out?


Come on, John!  Try answering these 5 questions.
I don't believe in the antimoon and know little about the published theories on it.
My bad, I meant James.  Could JAMES please answer the question I've quoted in red, please!?!?!?!

?

dude55

  • 178
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #130 on: April 28, 2010, 07:27:12 PM »
James, you claimed that the moon caused blindness or even DEATH, from the title of those books it doesnt appear to invovle that but instead mental degeneration. I would like to see the claims of blindness and death, and if so could you give me a qoute from said sources. Please, of course.

Its common knowledge.  The English navy even made regulations concerning it.
Sorry John but James said the mental affects, which I can neither confirm 'nor deny seeing as I have never seen someone go insane. However James said that BLINDNESS OR DEATH can occur. I am neither, nor is anyone else here. I want this link to the English navy making regulations or a source as google has not come up with anything for me.

I dont mean to come off as agressive but this is just becoming nonsense with James, I have no mean to be rude to either of you but its starting to become annoying. :|
That would be a simulation of the fabric of space-time bending back upon itself

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #131 on: April 29, 2010, 03:00:59 AM »
But where is your evidence that this object exists at all?  I mean, if it was up there, at some point we would see it, even during the day, just like we can the moon.  Either post proof of this object or, just admit you have none.

what happens with eclipses?!
Your post just made me think of another few questions for the FE'ers.  I'll number them so you guys don't miss any.

1.  What is the size of the antimoon, how far away is it, and exactly how does it cover the sun and moon in an eclipse?  
2.  Does it touch the surface of the sun or moon?  
3.  Does it float in front of it?  
4.  How far apart are they during the eclipse?  
5.  And how did you figure all this out?


Come on, John!  Try answering these 5 questions.
I don't believe in the antimoon and know little about the published theories on it.
My bad, I meant James.  Could JAMES please answer the question I've quoted in red, please!?!?!?!

1. The Antimoon is a little bigger than the Moon.
2. It does not touch the surface of the Moon as far as we can tell.
3. The Antimoon floats between the Moon and the Earth, blocking visibility to the Moon during a Lunar Eclipse.
4. Their distance has not been calculated, in fact, observation indicates that it is variable.
5. The Antimoon can be shown to exist by the phenomenon of daytime Lunar eclipses. The globularist model requirse that the Sun be "behind" the Round Earth from the perspective of the observer, so that the Earth blocks the Sun's rays. This ought to preclude the two bodies being in the same hemisphere simultaneously, although empirical evidence demonstrates that they are. Therefore, another celestial body is blocking Lunar visibility from Earth during an eclipse.
5b. Additionally, since it has been shown that the Moon shines by her own light, a lack of Sunlight would not prevent the Moon from being visible.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #132 on: April 29, 2010, 04:29:07 AM »
5. The Antimoon can be shown to exist by the phenomenon of daytime Lunar eclipses. The globularist model requirse that the Sun be "behind" the Round Earth from the perspective of the observer, so that the Earth blocks the Sun's rays. This ought to preclude the two bodies being in the same hemisphere simultaneously, although empirical evidence demonstrates that they are. Therefore, another celestial body is blocking Lunar visibility from Earth during an eclipse.

Any pictures or links to back this up?
How come it's undetectable, even to scientists that have no place in the conspiracy that would have seen this phenomenon.

5b. Additionally, since it has been shown that the Moon shines by her own light, a lack of Sunlight would not prevent the Moon from being visible.

You haven't shown anything, it's just another theory of yours.

*

Sliver

  • 557
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #133 on: April 29, 2010, 04:42:23 AM »
But where is your evidence that this object exists at all?  I mean, if it was up there, at some point we would see it, even during the day, just like we can the moon.  Either post proof of this object or, just admit you have none.

what happens with eclipses?!
Your post just made me think of another few questions for the FE'ers.  I'll number them so you guys don't miss any.

1.  What is the size of the antimoon, how far away is it, and exactly how does it cover the sun and moon in an eclipse?  
2.  Does it touch the surface of the sun or moon?  
3.  Does it float in front of it?  
4.  How far apart are they during the eclipse?  
5.  And how did you figure all this out?


Come on, John!  Try answering these 5 questions.
I don't believe in the antimoon and know little about the published theories on it.
My bad, I meant James.  Could JAMES please answer the question I've quoted in red, please!?!?!?!

1. The Antimoon is a little bigger than the Moon.
2. It does not touch the surface of the Moon as far as we can tell.
3. The Antimoon floats between the Moon and the Earth, blocking visibility to the Moon during a Lunar Eclipse.
4. Their distance has not been calculated, in fact, observation indicates that it is variable.
5. The Antimoon can be shown to exist by the phenomenon of daytime Lunar eclipses. The globularist model requirse that the Sun be "behind" the Round Earth from the perspective of the observer, so that the Earth blocks the Sun's rays. This ought to preclude the two bodies being in the same hemisphere simultaneously, although empirical evidence demonstrates that they are. Therefore, another celestial body is blocking Lunar visibility from Earth during an eclipse.
5b. Additionally, since it has been shown that the Moon shines by her own light, a lack of Sunlight would not prevent the Moon from being visible.
One more.  Why has it never been observed in the daylight?  We see the moon during the day all the time.  Why not the anitmoon?  

Also, here's where I'm going to shoot a giant hole in your little piece of BS here.  See, if there were two objects in the sky during an eclipse, an event that is frequently observed and photographed, then people would see two objects.  Especially since the FE model says that the moon is 3000 miles above the Earth, that puts the "antimoon" at a lower altitude.  If you don't believe that people would see two objects, try this.  Put an object of your choosing on a table, if you don't own a table, just use your floor.  Now, put another object of similar size and shape in front of the first one.  Now, look at them from different angles.  You'll notice, at some point, you can even see in between the two.  Since an object floating in front of the moon, has NEVER been documented, your antimoon is nothing more than a figment of your imagination.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #134 on: April 29, 2010, 07:09:52 AM »
5. The Antimoon can be shown to exist by the phenomenon of daytime Lunar eclipses. The globularist model requirse that the Sun be "behind" the Round Earth from the perspective of the observer, so that the Earth blocks the Sun's rays. This ought to preclude the two bodies being in the same hemisphere simultaneously, although empirical evidence demonstrates that they are. Therefore, another celestial body is blocking Lunar visibility from Earth during an eclipse.

Any pictures or links to back this up?
How come it's undetectable, even to scientists that have no place in the conspiracy that would have seen this phenomenon.

Daylight Lunar eclipses are well-documented, many have occured throughout history. The 19th Century geographer and astronomer Dr. McCulloch recorded two incidences, one in his own lifetime (in 1837) and one in 1717. The Daily Telegraph reported a daytime lunar eclipse on July 16th, 1870. They occur on a fairly regular basis.

One more.  Why has it never been observed in the daylight?  We see the moon during the day all the time.  Why not the anitmoon? 

It has never been observed in the daylight (except during Lunar eclipses!) because it does not emit its own light, like the Moon does. For this reason it is only visible when it passes in front of the Moon.

Also, here's where I'm going to shoot a giant hole in your little piece of BS here.  See, if there were two objects in the sky during an eclipse, an event that is frequently observed and photographed, then people would see two objects.  Especially since the FE model says that the moon is 3000 miles above the Earth, that puts the "antimoon" at a lower altitude.  If you don't believe that people would see two objects, try this.  Put an object of your choosing on a table, if you don't own a table, just use your floor.  Now, put another object of similar size and shape in front of the first one.  Now, look at them from different angles.  You'll notice, at some point, you can even see in between the two.  Since an object floating in front of the moon, has NEVER been documented, your antimoon is nothing more than a figment of your imagination.

People do see two objects. This is precisely why the Moon becomes invisible during a Lunar eclipse.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #135 on: April 29, 2010, 07:22:33 AM »
5. The Antimoon can be shown to exist by the phenomenon of daytime Lunar eclipses. The globularist model requirse that the Sun be "behind" the Round Earth from the perspective of the observer, so that the Earth blocks the Sun's rays. This ought to preclude the two bodies being in the same hemisphere simultaneously, although empirical evidence demonstrates that they are. Therefore, another celestial body is blocking Lunar visibility from Earth during an eclipse.

Any pictures or links to back this up?
How come it's undetectable, even to scientists that have no place in the conspiracy that would have seen this phenomenon.

Daylight Lunar eclipses are well-documented, many have occured throughout history. The 19th Century geographer and astronomer Dr. McCulloch recorded two incidences, one in his own lifetime (in 1837) and one in 1717. The Daily Telegraph reported a daytime lunar eclipse on July 16th, 1870. They occur on a fairly regular basis.

So you have nothing except what you say.

No links or anything?

I tried searching the internet, I spent an hour looking for such events, the conspiracy must have covered them up.

Pretty poor definition of "well-documented" you have there.

?

dude55

  • 178
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #136 on: April 29, 2010, 07:30:55 AM »
I also tried searching, I went through 5 or so pages and multiple variations of daytime lunar eclipse and also tried anti-moon. I have also never seen a daytime lunar eclipse.


I'm sorry but I'm just not finding these.

EDIT:Removed link, it wouldnt work for some reason but it did when I went to it before, it was of a morning hours, (Very early morning) semi-daylight lunar eclipse. However, it did not invovle anti-moon and it wasnt viewable in america I dont believe.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2010, 07:59:34 AM by dude55 »
That would be a simulation of the fabric of space-time bending back upon itself

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #137 on: April 29, 2010, 07:36:35 AM »
I get 404 error on your link.

?

dude55

  • 178
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #138 on: April 29, 2010, 07:56:09 AM »
Well thats odd, it worked when I had it. Let me try to fix it.
That would be a simulation of the fabric of space-time bending back upon itself

?

Lorddave

  • 19888
  • +30/-61
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #139 on: April 29, 2010, 12:46:59 PM »
5. The Antimoon can be shown to exist by the phenomenon of daytime Lunar eclipses. The globularist model requirse that the Sun be "behind" the Round Earth from the perspective of the observer, so that the Earth blocks the Sun's rays. This ought to preclude the two bodies being in the same hemisphere simultaneously, although empirical evidence demonstrates that they are. Therefore, another celestial body is blocking Lunar visibility from Earth during an eclipse.

Any pictures or links to back this up?
How come it's undetectable, even to scientists that have no place in the conspiracy that would have seen this phenomenon.

Daylight Lunar eclipses are well-documented, many have occured throughout history. The 19th Century geographer and astronomer Dr. McCulloch recorded two incidences, one in his own lifetime (in 1837) and one in 1717. The Daily Telegraph reported a daytime lunar eclipse on July 16th, 1870. They occur on a fairly regular basis.

One more.  Why has it never been observed in the daylight?  We see the moon during the day all the time.  Why not the anitmoon? 

It has never been observed in the daylight (except during Lunar eclipses!) because it does not emit its own light, like the Moon does. For this reason it is only visible when it passes in front of the Moon.

Also, here's where I'm going to shoot a giant hole in your little piece of BS here.  See, if there were two objects in the sky during an eclipse, an event that is frequently observed and photographed, then people would see two objects.  Especially since the FE model says that the moon is 3000 miles above the Earth, that puts the "antimoon" at a lower altitude.  If you don't believe that people would see two objects, try this.  Put an object of your choosing on a table, if you don't own a table, just use your floor.  Now, put another object of similar size and shape in front of the first one.  Now, look at them from different angles.  You'll notice, at some point, you can even see in between the two.  Since an object floating in front of the moon, has NEVER been documented, your antimoon is nothing more than a figment of your imagination.

People do see two objects. This is precisely why the Moon becomes invisible during a Lunar eclipse.

I just want to make a note...
Quote
The 19th Century geographer and astronomer Dr. McCulloch recorded two incidences, one in his own lifetime (in 1837) and one in 1717.

Care to explain how he RECORDED two incidences 100 years apart?  I don't know about you but I find it hard to record something that happened before I was born.
Gone.

?

Ellipsis

  • 467
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #140 on: April 29, 2010, 02:13:21 PM »
If the sun and moon are spotlights, the FAQ idea of the "antimoon" passing between them to create a shadow doesn't make any sense.

Unless it's a spotlight in two different directions for no reason, which is laughable.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #141 on: April 29, 2010, 02:39:35 PM »
5. The Antimoon can be shown to exist by the phenomenon of daytime Lunar eclipses. The globularist model requirse that the Sun be "behind" the Round Earth from the perspective of the observer, so that the Earth blocks the Sun's rays. This ought to preclude the two bodies being in the same hemisphere simultaneously, although empirical evidence demonstrates that they are. Therefore, another celestial body is blocking Lunar visibility from Earth during an eclipse.

Any pictures or links to back this up?
How come it's undetectable, even to scientists that have no place in the conspiracy that would have seen this phenomenon.

Daylight Lunar eclipses are well-documented, many have occured throughout history. The 19th Century geographer and astronomer Dr. McCulloch recorded two incidences, one in his own lifetime (in 1837) and one in 1717. The Daily Telegraph reported a daytime lunar eclipse on July 16th, 1870. They occur on a fairly regular basis.

So you have nothing except what you say.

No links or anything?

I tried searching the internet, I spent an hour looking for such events, the conspiracy must have covered them up.

Pretty poor definition of "well-documented" you have there.

You betray your lack of exposure to scientific and academic practises with you refusal to accept data from published works because it can't be linked on the internet. Men of science such as myself have a healthy respect for publications.

If the sun and moon are spotlights, the FAQ idea of the "antimoon" passing between them to create a shadow doesn't make any sense.

The Moon shines by its own light. When the Antimoon moves between the Moon and the Earth, the Moon ceases to be visible.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Ellipsis

  • 467
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #142 on: April 29, 2010, 02:45:00 PM »
The Moon shines by its own light. When the Antimoon moves between the Moon and the Earth, the Moon ceases to be visible.
I'm just going by the explanation provided in the FAQ, which is this thread's subject.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #143 on: April 29, 2010, 02:48:18 PM »
The Moon shines by its own light. When the Antimoon moves between the Moon and the Earth, the Moon ceases to be visible.
I'm just going by the explanation provided in the FAQ, which is this thread's subject.

Not all of our knowledge is contained in the FAQ. Like Plato's Republic, some of our more complicated scientific information is too advanced to take in all at once. The FAQ is a starting point, it is not the be all and end all of the truth.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Ellipsis

  • 467
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #144 on: April 29, 2010, 02:49:32 PM »
Good, you and I both agree the FAQ is completely wrong on at least this point.

?

iwanttobelieve

  • 5442
  • +0/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #145 on: April 29, 2010, 03:01:59 PM »
the sun is a floodlight. at least that is my belief

abnd once again the FAQ was written by a non believer meant to mock Round Disc shaped earth believers

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #146 on: April 29, 2010, 03:08:02 PM »
If you are sick of the FAQ then you should read Levee's alternative FAQ as well, it is contraversial in our community but it does contain some shocking insights.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #147 on: April 29, 2010, 04:06:41 PM »
If you are sick of the FAQ then you should read Levee's alternative FAQ as well, it is contraversial in our community but it does contain some shocking insights.

Where is this alternate FAQ?
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #148 on: April 29, 2010, 04:07:45 PM »
If the sun and moon are spotlights, the FAQ idea of the "antimoon" passing between them to create a shadow doesn't make any sense.

Unless it's a spotlight in two different directions for no reason, which is laughable.


The sun and moon can not be on the same plane.  The moon must be below the sun so that a solar eclipse can occur.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Antimoon?!?!?!
« Reply #149 on: April 29, 2010, 04:16:08 PM »
If the sun and moon are spotlights, the FAQ idea of the "antimoon" passing between them to create a shadow doesn't make any sense.

Unless it's a spotlight in two different directions for no reason, which is laughable.


The sun and moon can not be on the same plane.  The moon must be below the sun so that a solar eclipse can occur.
Exactly.  It is not uncommon for someone not understanding the theories to post a crudely drawn napkin drawing that "proves" fet is impossible;  most of the time it is due to ill conceived preconceptions about what flat earth theory says due to ignorance or pig-headedness.
I.f you can't rgue both sides, youu understand neither