Antimoon?!?!?!

Again, I read this in the FAQ.  (You may be noticing a trend in my recent threads.)

Q: "What about Lunar Eclipses?"

A: A celestial body, known as the antimoon, passes between the sun and moon. This projects a shadow upon the moon.

Where is your evidence to back this up?

There is none. The Antimoon is a conclusion by inference, and there is no direct evidence for it.

The evidence is in the sky. You can just go out on a clear night and see the darn thing! (Since it doesn't emit light, look for the area with no stars)

The evidence is in the sky. You can just go out on a clear night and see the darn thing! (Since it doesn't emit light, look for the area with no stars)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dude, why don't you share what you're smoking?  I've been out to the desert New Mexico.  You can look up out there, an area with no light pollution, and see there is no area of the sky where there are no stars. 

Quote from: James on April 25, 2010, 02:32:51 PM

The evidence is in the sky. You can just go out on a clear night and see the darn thing! (Since it doesn't emit light, look for the area with no stars)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dude, why don't you share what you're smoking?  I've been out to the desert New Mexico.  You can look up out there, an area with no light pollution, and see there is no area of the sky where there are no stars.  

1) If there was no area without stars, the sky would be white.


2) Are you saying that you see stars inside the crescent moon, where the rest of the moon should be?


3) Are you saying that during a lunar eclipse, you can see stars where the moon should be?

The evidence is in the sky. You can just go out on a clear night and see the darn thing! (Since it doesn't emit light, look for the area with no stars)

So you see stars vanish them reappear at night?

That should show up pretty well on a time lapse photo.

Quote from: Sliver on April 25, 2010, 02:45:17 PM

Quote from: James on April 25, 2010, 02:32:51 PM

The evidence is in the sky. You can just go out on a clear night and see the darn thing! (Since it doesn't emit light, look for the area with no stars)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dude, why don't you share what you're smoking?  I've been out to the desert New Mexico.  You can look up out there, an area with no light pollution, and see there is no area of the sky where there are no stars.  

1) If there was no area without stars, the sky would be white.


2) Are you saying that you see stars inside the crescent moon, where the rest of the moon should be?


3) Are you saying that during a lunar eclipse, you can see stars where the moon should be?

He's telling me there is a round area of the sky with no stars, right now, without an eclipse occurring.  I'm saying I've seen otherwise.  Now, if you would like to try answering my question, instead of taking shots at me, please, be my guest.

Quote from: James on April 25, 2010, 02:32:51 PM

The evidence is in the sky. You can just go out on a clear night and see the darn thing! (Since it doesn't emit light, look for the area with no stars)

So you see stars vanish them reappear at night?

That should show up pretty well on a time lapse photo.

Perhaps so; since the sky is freely available to all peoples of the Earth, I am sure it would be little trouble for you to locate the Antimoon on a given night using this method. I prefer to stay away from the open sky on a cloudless night, however, as the Moon's rays are damaging to human health.

Quote from: Lorddave on April 25, 2010, 02:48:52 PM

Quote from: James on April 25, 2010, 02:32:51 PM

The evidence is in the sky. You can just go out on a clear night and see the darn thing! (Since it doesn't emit light, look for the area with no stars)

So you see stars vanish them reappear at night?

That should show up pretty well on a time lapse photo.

Perhaps so; since the sky is freely available to all peoples of the Earth, I am sure it would be little trouble for you to locate the Antimoon on a given night using this method. I prefer to stay away from the open sky on a cloudless night, however, as the Moon's rays are damaging to human health.

I'm pretty sure someone hacked your account because every one of your posts for the past few days have been more retarded then ever. (Not saying they generally are.)

Moons rays are damaging to health? Well how are they? I've been watching the skies since I was 5 and I'm healthy so far.

I'm pretty sure someone hacked your account because every one of your posts for the past few days have been more retarded then ever. (Not saying they generally are.)

I can assure you that I am entirely myself, in as much as anybody is ever themselves.

Moons rays are damaging to health? Well how are they? I've been watching the skies since I was 5 and I'm healthy so far.

It is common knowledge that exposure to the Moon can cause blindness and even death. It is injurous to plants and animals as well as humans. The Royal Navy prohibits sailors from sleeping on deck precisely to prevent prolonged exposure to Moonlight, which can peturb the brains of the crew and make them unfit to fight.

Quote from: dude55 on April 25, 2010, 04:27:27 PM

I'm pretty sure someone hacked your account because every one of your posts for the past few days have been more retarded then ever. (Not saying they generally are.)

I can assure you that I am entirely myself, in as much as anybody is ever themselves.

Quote from: dude55 on April 25, 2010, 04:27:27 PM

Moons rays are damaging to health? Well how are they? I've been watching the skies since I was 5 and I'm healthy so far.

It is common knowledge that exposure to the Moon can cause blindness and even death. It is injurous to plants and animals as well as humans. The Royal Navy prohibits sailors from sleeping on deck precisely to prevent prolonged exposure to Moonlight, which can peturb the brains of the crew and make them unfit to fight.

1.I'm not blind and I look at the moon all the time.
2.I'm not dead I'm typing to you arent I? Hell If I'm blind I wouldnt be typing.
3.You didnt mention how it can peturb their brains, I'd like a reference to that please...And the first two.

Quote from: dude55 on April 25, 2010, 04:27:27 PM

Moons rays are damaging to health? Well how are they? I've been watching the skies since I was 5 and I'm healthy so far.

It is common knowledge that exposure to the Moon can cause blindness and even death. It is injurous to plants and animals as well as humans. The Royal Navy prohibits sailors from sleeping on deck precisely to prevent prolonged exposure to Moonlight, which can peturb the brains of the crew and make them unfit to fight.

Maybe it's common knowledge in the mental hospital they have you in, but not out here in the real world.

For references to its effects on plants, eyes and naval ordinances, see Rowbotham, S. B. (1881) 'Earth Not a Globe...', Third Edition, London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co. pp. 140-142.

For references to its effects on plants, eyes and naval ordinances, see Rowbotham, S. B. (1881) 'Earth Not a Globe...', Third Edition, London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co. pp. 140-142.

I dont currently have it in my obtainment currently although I may eventually buy it. Also, is that book currently credible? And are their any other references to the moons affects on humans and plants besides that book?

Dr Lardner's Museum of Art and Science contains information regarding the properties of the Moon.

Dr Lardner's Museum of Art and Science contains information regarding the properties of the Moon.

Do you currently have any up to date references? Much has developed in the field of science since then.

Quote from: James on April 25, 2010, 04:45:03 PM

Dr Lardner's Museum of Art and Science contains information regarding the properties of the Moon.

Do you currently have any up to date references? Much has developed in the field of science since then.

Bhattacharjee, C., Bradley, P. et al. (2000) 'Do Animals Bite More During A Full Moon? Retrospective Observational Analysis'. In BMJ: British Medical Journal, Vol. 321, No. 7276. pp. 1559-1561.

Thakur, C. P., & Sharma, D. (1984) 'Full Moon And Crime'. In British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition). Vol. 289, No. 6460. pp. 1789-1791.

That should get you started off, there is plenty more contemporary evidence on the multitude of negative effects of Moonlight. It increases aggression and mental degeneracy in animals and humans alike.

1) If there was no area without stars, the sky would be white.

Quote from: dude55 on April 25, 2010, 04:49:02 PM

Quote from: James on April 25, 2010, 04:45:03 PM

Dr Lardner's Museum of Art and Science contains information regarding the properties of the Moon.

Do you currently have any up to date references? Much has developed in the field of science since then.

Bhattacharjee, C., Bradley, P. et al. (2000) 'Do Animals Bite More During A Full Moon? Retrospective Observational Analysis'. In BMJ: British Medical Journal, Vol. 321, No. 7276. pp. 1559-1561.

Thakur, C. P., & Sharma, D. (1984) 'Full Moon And Crime'. In British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition). Vol. 289, No. 6460. pp. 1789-1791.

I will certainly attempt to get the first one. Although I never generally have any agressive behaviors or mental degeneracy...

Here. again, is a link James is too lazy to post.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za29.htm#page_140
It proves nothing other than living things need sunlight.



And I just realized James has derailed my friggin thread!!!!!!!!

Prove there is an antimoon!  Cite scientific data, not your massively outdated books.

Here. again, is a link James is too lazy to post.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za29.htm#page_140
It proves nothing other than living things need sunlight.



And I just realized James has derailed my friggin thread!!!!!!!!

Prove there is an antimoon!  Cite scientific data, not your massively outdated books.

I just cited two peer-reviewed articles from the last 30 years to support my claims about Moonlight. Why don't you cite some up-to-date documents which contradict me?

Quote from: Sliver on April 25, 2010, 05:08:36 PM

Here. again, is a link James is too lazy to post.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za29.htm#page_140
It proves nothing other than living things need sunlight.



And I just realized James has derailed my friggin thread!!!!!!!!

Prove there is an antimoon!  Cite scientific data, not your massively outdated books.

I just cited two peer-reviewed articles from the last 30 years to support my claims about Moonlight. Why don't you cite some up-to-date documents which contradict me?

Nice try.  I challenged you to prove the existence of an antimoon.  You've changed the subject to try and talk about moonlight and it's effects on the Earth.  See, I'm not the person making wild, baseless claims, so therefor, the burden of proof is not on me, it's on the Flat Earth Society.

Nice try.  I challenged you to prove the existence of an antimoon.  You've changed the subject to try and talk about moonlight and it's effects on the Earth.  See, I'm not the person making wild, baseless claims, so therefor, the burden of proof is not on me, it's on the Flat Earth Society.

I did not change the subject at all, dude55 brought up the effects of Moonlight, which seem fairly relevent to the current subject matter (i.e. viewing the Antimoon), and I responded with evidence.

You can step out on your front porch and see the Antimoon. It's not a wild, baseless claim, it's an appeal to obvious empirical facts.

Quote from: Sliver on April 25, 2010, 05:22:14 PM

Nice try.  I challenged you to prove the existence of an antimoon.  You've changed the subject to try and talk about moonlight and it's effects on the Earth.  See, I'm not the person making wild, baseless claims, so therefor, the burden of proof is not on me, it's on the Flat Earth Society.

I did not change the subject at all, dude55 brought up the effects of Moonlight, which seem fairly relevent to the current subject matter (i.e. viewing the Antimoon), and I responded with evidence.

You can step out on your front porch and see the Antimoon. It's not a wild, baseless claim, it's an appeal to obvious empirical facts.

Please, post a picture of the antimoon.  Here's what Google comes up with.

Quote from: James on April 25, 2010, 05:24:16 PM

Quote from: Sliver on April 25, 2010, 05:22:14 PM

Nice try.  I challenged you to prove the existence of an antimoon.  You've changed the subject to try and talk about moonlight and it's effects on the Earth.  See, I'm not the person making wild, baseless claims, so therefor, the burden of proof is not on me, it's on the Flat Earth Society.

I did not change the subject at all, dude55 brought up the effects of Moonlight, which seem fairly relevent to the current subject matter (i.e. viewing the Antimoon), and I responded with evidence.

You can step out on your front porch and see the Antimoon. It's not a wild, baseless claim, it's an appeal to obvious empirical facts.

Please, post a picture of the antimoon.  Here's what Google comes up with.

I don't have a picture of the Antimoon to hand, not least because it's one of the most boring objects in the night sky. You could go outside on almost any clear night and photograph it for yourself - it's the Moon-sized patch of starless sky.

Quote from: Sliver on April 25, 2010, 05:25:22 PM

Quote from: James on April 25, 2010, 05:24:16 PM

Quote from: Sliver on April 25, 2010, 05:22:14 PM

Nice try.  I challenged you to prove the existence of an antimoon.  You've changed the subject to try and talk about moonlight and it's effects on the Earth.  See, I'm not the person making wild, baseless claims, so therefor, the burden of proof is not on me, it's on the Flat Earth Society.

I did not change the subject at all, dude55 brought up the effects of Moonlight, which seem fairly relevent to the current subject matter (i.e. viewing the Antimoon), and I responded with evidence.

You can step out on your front porch and see the Antimoon. It's not a wild, baseless claim, it's an appeal to obvious empirical facts.

Please, post a picture of the antimoon.  Here's what Google comes up with.

I don't have a picture of the Antimoon to hand, not least because it's one of the most boring objects in the night sky. You could go outside on almost any clear night and photograph it for yourself - it's the Moon-sized patch of starless sky.

You guys are all messed up. You tell us to do crap. Why can't you? Stop making excuses, and prove EVERYTHING that has to do with the Flat Earth Society. I hate when people ask for evidence, you link to THIS website. Hello? Of course it will back up what you say!

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on April 25, 2010, 02:47:15 PM

1) If there was no area without stars, the sky would be white.

Yeah, I was confused at first, too. Then I realized if there was no empty spaces, the stars would fill up the sky, giving an impression of a white sky at night. (Psst, the Antimoon spot... it doesn't exist, James. Your head is hard boiled.)

I don't have a picture of the Antimoon to hand, not least because it's one of the most boring objects in the night sky. You could go outside on almost any clear night and photograph it for yourself - it's the Moon-sized patch of starless sky.

You guys are all messed up. You tell us to do crap. Why can't you? Stop making excuses, and prove EVERYTHING that has to do with the Flat Earth Society. I hate when people ask for evidence, you link to THIS website. Hello? Of course it will back up what you say!
[/quote]

Why does the Antimoon even really have anything to do with the shape of the Earth? I mean, it exists whether the Earth is flat, round or a donut. It's out there in the sky for everyone to see. Why does globularism drive people to deny the most basic facts in order to defend their crazy theory?

Well James, I found a panoramic picture of the night sky and I can't seem to find the Anti-moon.

http://www.nps.gov/labe/parknews/images/Nightsky_from_Beds_2_KFalls_moonrising_milkyway.jpg

Can you tell me where it is?

Also:
The effects of moonlight are false.
How do I know?

Nocturnal animals.  If moonlight was harmful, they wouldn't be here.