The Sun

  • 115 Replies
  • 29024 Views
?

corleone

  • 77
  • +0/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #90 on: April 23, 2010, 11:26:12 AM »
Hey, Parsifal, what if I can disprove bendy light theory?

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3125
  • +0/-0
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: The Sun
« Reply #91 on: April 23, 2010, 12:23:23 PM »
Hey, Parsifal, what if I can disprove bendy light theory?

It's already been done.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

*

Xerox

  • 151
  • +0/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #92 on: April 23, 2010, 07:14:57 PM »
Parsifal and others in this thread have obviously had no education in physics, astronomy, geology or mathematics by the looks of it.  I can't say for sure, but my observations have led me to this conclusion.  I can't test my theory, but I will make a whole website that is totally based on that assumption and argue with people in my forums.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: The Sun
« Reply #93 on: April 23, 2010, 07:34:14 PM »
Ah, you admit irrelevant low content posting? Do you want to report yourself to a moderator or should one of us do it?

When did I admit to that?

Then why do you use it to describe phenomena if it cannot be validated?  You're just guessing at that point.

For the same reason that REers use a process that hasn't been validated to describe the way the sun shines, I imagine.

Hey, Parsifal, what if I can disprove bendy light theory?

Then you can disprove bendy light theory. I'm really not sure what else you want me to say here.

Hey, Parsifal, what if I can disprove bendy light theory?

It's already been done.

No it hasn't.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

corleone

  • 77
  • +0/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #94 on: April 24, 2010, 01:29:13 AM »
Hey, Parsifal, what if I can disprove bendy light theory?

Then you can disprove bendy light theory. I'm really not sure what else you want me to say here.

Ok. Then, may you have a look in here and post your opinions about my experiment? (as I asked you earlyer via PM but you ignored me)

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=37353.0

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3125
  • +0/-0
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: The Sun
« Reply #95 on: April 24, 2010, 02:59:04 AM »

Hey, Parsifal, what if I can disprove bendy light theory?

It's already been done.

No it hasn't.

Umm, until you post your explanation of why my disproof is wrong, then yes it has. You said you'd give us a diagram to explain your point which none of us can understand, but for the second time you've just clammed up on further enlightening us. When you present your case against my disproof in a clear and understandable fashion, then we'll see. Until then, my disproof stands, as there is no counter explanation.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

*

Sliver

  • 557
  • +0/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #96 on: April 25, 2010, 09:08:44 AM »
OK, so I'm going to see if any FE'ers want to try and prove this model of how the Earth, Sun, and Moon relate to each other.  In the quote below, you will find a few formulas you can use to scale down the model I linked.  Then try them at home.  In order to prove that the model linked is even possible, you will need to get the light source to effectively illuminate half of the surface area of the circle in a pattern consistent with current know sunlight patterns.  If you can't do it, than it disproves this model.  If you can, than it proves this model would can work.  That's pretty easy for you.  So, instead of being lazy and just posting reasons why you won't try the experiment (Parsifal), give it a shot and see if you can score one for the FET team!

It's simple.  Here you go.
1.  By knowing in your model that the sun is 32 miles across and 3000 miles away than we can calculate that the objects distance is 93.75 times it's diameter.
2.  By comparing the diameters of the two objects, 32 miles for the sun, and 24,900 miles for the Earth, we can calculate that the Earth in your model is 778.125 times larger than your sun.

Using this data, here are your variables.
S-Sun's Diameter
E-Earth's Diameter
A-Sun's Altitude Above Earth.

And here are your formulas.
E=S*778.125
A=S*93.75

So, use whatever you want for your sun's diameter, it will give you the other measurement, and then you can try it out for yourself.
Don't forget, guys.  The model you use for the sun MUST be a spot light!  See the quote below.

Quote from: FES FAQ
Q: "What about time zones?"

A: The sun is a spotlight which shines light on a concentrated area, so not everywhere on Earth will be lit at once. Times zones exist so that everyone's clock will be at 12:00 around the time the sun is approximately directly overhead.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 05:02:02 PM by Sliver »

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: The Sun
« Reply #97 on: April 25, 2010, 02:50:43 PM »
It's provable by this thing called PHYSICS which has a predictive power, in which EXPERIMENTS can tell us what would happen if the conditions were changed. If you want to go to nuclear physicists and tell them that nuclear fusion would suddenly stop working if they gave the reaction a bit more fuel, then go right ahead. Make sure you video this encounter - I'd love to see it when they laugh and point at you, or if you manage to persuade them, when they burn 60 years of research papers. One or the other will happen, but I think you should act as an experiment to find out which.

Physics makes predictions, yes, but that doesn't mean those predictions are valid. They need to be tested before we can draw any conclusions about them.

The mention of fission was to point out that a fusion reaction is not necessarily a massive big bang. Learn to understand the relevance of different bits of the post and what they relate to. It is, like your beliefs, irrelevant to the model of the Sun.

"I don't understand the point you're trying to make. You're dragging the conversation off on a tangent, while still not providing any evidence that a sustainable fusion reaction is possible."

Look, retard. You are disproving the FE theory right there. You guys haven't proven the Earth as flat, the sun as 32 miles long, or that it's 3000 miles away. I don't think it's so hard for only ONE FE'er to get a job at NASA, take his/her own digital camera, and take pictures of the so-called "flat" Earth. And 3,000 miles isn't far away. Why doesn't this "flat Earth spy" take a trip to the Sun and take pictures of this FE Sun? And you always bring the conversation off-topic by your CRAP pleas about "refraining from personal attacks". No one is personally attacking you, they're just saying the facts, douche. So explain to me how these FE'ers (not you, because you sometimes say that you aren't to get off topic) think that the Earth is flat, the Sun being 32 miles long and shit without proving it. And please, do answer without getting off topic.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

Sliver

  • 557
  • +0/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #98 on: April 25, 2010, 02:56:16 PM »
It's provable by this thing called PHYSICS which has a predictive power, in which EXPERIMENTS can tell us what would happen if the conditions were changed. If you want to go to nuclear physicists and tell them that nuclear fusion would suddenly stop working if they gave the reaction a bit more fuel, then go right ahead. Make sure you video this encounter - I'd love to see it when they laugh and point at you, or if you manage to persuade them, when they burn 60 years of research papers. One or the other will happen, but I think you should act as an experiment to find out which.

Physics makes predictions, yes, but that doesn't mean those predictions are valid. They need to be tested before we can draw any conclusions about them.

The mention of fission was to point out that a fusion reaction is not necessarily a massive big bang. Learn to understand the relevance of different bits of the post and what they relate to. It is, like your beliefs, irrelevant to the model of the Sun.

"I don't understand the point you're trying to make. You're dragging the conversation off on a tangent, while still not providing any evidence that a sustainable fusion reaction is possible."

Look, retard. You are disproving the FE theory right there. You guys haven't proven the Earth as flat, the sun as 32 miles long, or that it's 3000 miles away. I don't think it's so hard for only ONE FE'er to get a job at NASA, take his/her own digital camera, and take pictures of the so-called "flat" Earth. And 3,000 miles isn't far away. Why doesn't this "flat Earth spy" take a trip to the Sun and take pictures of this FE Sun? And you always bring the conversation off-topic by your CRAP pleas about "refraining from personal attacks". No one is personally attacking you, they're just saying the facts, douche. So explain to me how these FE'ers (not you, because you sometimes say that you aren't to get off topic) think that the Earth is flat, the Sun being 32 miles long and shit without proving it. And please, do answer without getting off topic.
Fixed your post for you.

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: The Sun
« Reply #99 on: April 25, 2010, 05:39:06 PM »
It's provable by this thing called PHYSICS which has a predictive power, in which EXPERIMENTS can tell us what would happen if the conditions were changed. If you want to go to nuclear physicists and tell them that nuclear fusion would suddenly stop working if they gave the reaction a bit more fuel, then go right ahead. Make sure you video this encounter - I'd love to see it when they laugh and point at you, or if you manage to persuade them, when they burn 60 years of research papers. One or the other will happen, but I think you should act as an experiment to find out which.

Physics makes predictions, yes, but that doesn't mean those predictions are valid. They need to be tested before we can draw any conclusions about them.

The mention of fission was to point out that a fusion reaction is not necessarily a massive big bang. Learn to understand the relevance of different bits of the post and what they relate to. It is, like your beliefs, irrelevant to the model of the Sun.

"I don't understand the point you're trying to make. You're dragging the conversation off on a tangent, while still not providing any evidence that a sustainable fusion reaction is possible."

Look, retard. You are disproving the FE theory right there. You guys haven't proven the Earth as flat, the sun as 32 miles long, or that it's 3000 miles away. I don't think it's so hard for only ONE FE'er to get a job at NASA, take his/her own digital camera, and take pictures of the so-called "flat" Earth. And 3,000 miles isn't far away. Why doesn't this "flat Earth spy" take a trip to the Sun and take pictures of this FE Sun? And you always bring the conversation off-topic by your CRAP pleas about "refraining from personal attacks". No one is personally attacking you, they're just saying the facts, douche. So explain to me how these FE'ers (not you, because you sometimes say that you aren't to get off topic) think that the Earth is flat, the Sun being 32 miles long and shit without proving it. And please, do answer without getting off topic.
Fixed your post for you.

Thanks, brah. I'm new here, you see.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #100 on: April 25, 2010, 05:41:17 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: The Sun
« Reply #101 on: April 25, 2010, 05:50:34 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

And you would know this... how? Have you actually tried applying? And if you did, why don't you give us a little overview of what they do.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #102 on: April 25, 2010, 05:54:32 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

And you would know this... how? Have you actually tried applying? And if you did, why don't you give us a little overview of what they do.

Come on, are you seriously suggesting that NASA would hire someone who believed the Earth was flat?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8880
  • +3/-3
  • Semper vigilans
Re: The Sun
« Reply #103 on: April 25, 2010, 05:56:08 PM »
They always tell me to try again later when I apply for an astronaut job :/
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

*

Death-T

  • 500
  • +0/-0
  • Conspiracy theories are my bread and butter.
Re: The Sun
« Reply #104 on: April 25, 2010, 05:56:31 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

Then..... lie. Problem solved.
" Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. " - Albert Einstein

" We are imperfect.  We cannot expect perfect government. "  ~William Howard Taft

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: The Sun
« Reply #105 on: April 25, 2010, 06:16:51 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

Then..... lie. Problem solved.

THANK YOU! These idiots just don't get it!
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8880
  • +3/-3
  • Semper vigilans
Re: The Sun
« Reply #106 on: April 25, 2010, 06:17:48 PM »
They always tell me to try again later when I apply for an astronaut job :/
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: The Sun
« Reply #107 on: April 25, 2010, 06:17:54 PM »
They always tell me to try again later when I apply for an astronaut job :/

Mhmm... get someone else that is a FE'er to apply. Repeat until some educated FE'er gets the job. Cause one person has a low chance of getting the job. A lot... well you get the picture.
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +98/-138
Re: The Sun
« Reply #108 on: April 25, 2010, 06:22:06 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

And you would know this... how? Have you actually tried applying? And if you did, why don't you give us a little overview of what they do.

Come on, are you seriously suggesting that NASA would hire someone who believed the Earth was flat?

As a government agency, NASA is not allowed to discriminate against one's personal beliefs.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: The Sun
« Reply #109 on: April 25, 2010, 06:22:59 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

And you would know this... how? Have you actually tried applying? And if you did, why don't you give us a little overview of what they do.

Come on, are you seriously suggesting that NASA would hire someone who believed the Earth was flat?

As a government agency, NASA is not allowed to discriminate against one's personal beliefs.

But it's all a conspiracy, remember? LOL
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +98/-138
Re: The Sun
« Reply #110 on: April 25, 2010, 06:34:20 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

And you would know this... how? Have you actually tried applying? And if you did, why don't you give us a little overview of what they do.

Come on, are you seriously suggesting that NASA would hire someone who believed the Earth was flat?

As a government agency, NASA is not allowed to discriminate against one's personal beliefs.

But it's all a conspiracy, remember? LOL

I don't think that they would risk the publicity of a job discrimination law suit.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Rahimz

  • 78
  • +0/-0
  • Creepers
Re: The Sun
« Reply #111 on: April 25, 2010, 06:36:54 PM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

And you would know this... how? Have you actually tried applying? And if you did, why don't you give us a little overview of what they do.

Come on, are you seriously suggesting that NASA would hire someone who believed the Earth was flat?

As a government agency, NASA is not allowed to discriminate against one's personal beliefs.

But it's all a conspiracy, remember? LOL

I don't think that they would risk the publicity of a job discrimination law suit.


Yep. http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm is exactly why I love alaska.net now. It explains everything about the FET.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 06:43:32 PM by Rahimz »
The Flat Earth Society is awesome

?

roundearth4lyf

  • 43
  • +0/-0
  • The world is obviously flat, horizon = conspiracy
Re: The Sun
« Reply #112 on: June 22, 2010, 02:36:18 AM »
It is actually incredibly hard for an FE'er to get a job at NASA. They screen for that kind of thing.

Please explain this quote then -->

Yes.  There are an alarming number of people in on this conspiracy:

-All astronomers/geologists.

-All pilots.

-Anyone who has claimed to have travelled around the world or made it to the South Pole.

-All NASA employees.

-All people who claim to live on the fake continent Australia.

-All the Ice Wall guards.

Most experts estimate their ranks to be in the millions.
The world is obviously flat, horizon = conspiracy

?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: The Sun
« Reply #113 on: June 22, 2010, 12:09:07 PM »
They always tell me to try again later when I apply for an astronaut job :/

from their POV the lot of you are mentally unstable...
to be an astronaut you need to be good at science, they don't want some guy blabering on about the dangerous moon.
If you were to hide your eccentricity, even then, there a certain level of mental and physical superiority that they need

?

BtheB

  • 66
  • +0/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #114 on: June 23, 2010, 07:37:35 AM »
They always tell me to try again later when I apply for an astronaut job :/

Do you have any cowboy experience?  They tend to look for at least five years of cowboy experience when they hire astronauts.

?

SSSavio

  • 223
  • +0/-0
Re: The Sun
« Reply #115 on: June 23, 2010, 07:43:01 AM »
They always tell me to try again later when I apply for an astronaut job :/

Do you have any cowboy experience?  They tend to look for at least five years of cowboy experience when they hire astronauts.

Who cares of being astronaut. To be an astronaut you have to be incredibly strong mentally and phisically, and very determined. It s not simple as drink a glass of water