[id]

How?

It's not necessarily a bad idea for a song, but the recording of it on the album is so lifeless, and it also doesn't belong where it was placed on the album.

Why?

Because it would be more envigorating to watch a slow-motion replay of a game of chess.

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:14:13 AM

How?

It's not necessarily a bad idea for a song, but the recording of it on the album is so lifeless, and it also doesn't belong where it was placed on the album.

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:14:13 AM

Why?

Because it would be more envigorating to watch a slow-motion replay of a game of chess.

invigorating*

Also, your opinions suck. Both these songs are amazing and kick "Veil of Maya"'s ass any day.

Who gives a shit if the Beatles were mainstream? They made great, timeless music. Shut up.

When a main argument is "shut up," you know you've got a good case.

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:05:33 AM

Who gives a shit if the Beatles were mainstream? They made great, timeless music. Shut up.

When a main argument is "shut up," you know you've got a good case.

That's not my main argument you sad little man. Lrn2read

That post consisted of two sentences and one sentence fragment. If you only have three arguments, I'm counting all of them as main arguments.

That post consisted of two sentences and one sentence fragment. If you only have three arguments, I'm counting all of them as main arguments.

My main argument and my only argument is that the Beatles were the greatest band of all time and no one can ever surpass them, especially not metal bands.

That's not an argument, that's an opinion.

That's not an argument, that's an opinion.

And it's the correct one in this case.

Quote from: Wendy on April 07, 2010, 08:23:37 AM

That post consisted of two sentences and one sentence fragment. If you only have three arguments, I'm counting all of them as main arguments.

My main argument and my only argument is that the Beatles were the greatest band of all time and no one can ever surpass them, especially not metal bands.

Failboat.


Anyways, what ever happened to Veil Of Mayas thread?

Oh wait, Veil Of Maya is just a shameless advertiser, right?

Shouldn't this be in Arts?

It really should.

Quote from: Wendy on April 07, 2010, 08:27:24 AM

That's not an argument, that's an opinion.

And it's the correct one in this case.

No, it isn't. It's an opinion. It only has a value to those who share similar tastes with you.

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:25:09 AM

Quote from: Wendy on April 07, 2010, 08:23:37 AM

That post consisted of two sentences and one sentence fragment. If you only have three arguments, I'm counting all of them as main arguments.

My main argument and my only argument is that the Beatles were the greatest band of all time and no one can ever surpass them, especially not metal bands.

Failboat.

No, it's not.

invigorating*

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/envigorate

Also, your opinions suck. Both these songs are amazing and kick "Veil of Maya"'s ass any day.

I haven't even heard "Veil of Maya", and other bands are irrelevant to the fact that the Beatles made shitty, boring pop music.

I haven't even heard "Veil of Maya", and other bands are irrelevant to the fact that the Beatles made shitty, boring pop music.

Change your fucking opinion. Stop inundating my forums with fail.

I haven't even heard "Veil of Maya", and other bands are irrelevant to the fact that the Beatles made shitty, boring pop music.

This.

Your opinion is your own, though, Dino. And you are welcome to disagree.

Change your fucking opinion.

Listen to better music.

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:44:38 AM

Change your fucking opinion.

Listen to better music.

The Beatles are the greatest music known to man, asswipe.

No, that'd be Daft Punk.

The Beatles are the greatest music known to man, asswipe.

That depends which man you are. And if this statement is true for you, then I pity your inexperienced listening.

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:46:42 AM

The Beatles are the greatest music known to man, asswipe.

And if this statement is true for you, then I pity your inexperienced listening.

You're the only inexperienced one here. At least Wendy can admit that the Beatles were actually good.

Quote from: Parsifal on April 07, 2010, 08:48:50 AM

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:46:42 AM

The Beatles are the greatest music known to man, asswipe.

And if this statement is true for you, then I pity your inexperienced listening.

You're the only inexperienced one here. At least Wendy can admit that the Beatles were actually good.

Whoah, now. I thought I said they were "nice." "Nice" and "played good music" are completely unrelated.

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:50:08 AM

Quote from: Parsifal on April 07, 2010, 08:48:50 AM

Quote from: Dino Piranha on April 07, 2010, 08:46:42 AM

The Beatles are the greatest music known to man, asswipe.

And if this statement is true for you, then I pity your inexperienced listening.

You're the only inexperienced one here. At least Wendy can admit that the Beatles were actually good.

Whoah, now. I thought I said they were "nice." "Nice" and "played good music" are completely unrelated.

You are now officially inexperienced. 

If "inexperienced" is the same as "Didn't listen to the beatles until his brain haemorrhaged," then I'm gladly inexperienced. Also, why is it a bad thing that we don't share your musical taste? I thought diversity was the spice of life.

Also, why is it a bad thing that we don't share your musical taste?

Because your tastes are retarded and awful.

That doesn't really matter though, does it? You're not going to magically make me like the Beatles. In fact, the concept is so ridiculous I had a little chuckle while writing up this post.

You're not going to magically make me like the Beatles.

If you had one ten-millionth of a brain cell you would like them already.

I would call that argumentum ad hominem, but you don't have an argument from the beginning. You're just like the sixteen-year-olds who wet their panties whenever Robert Pattinson is seen on a screen, who yell out how "retarted" I am because I don't see the greatness that is Twilight.

I would call that argumentum ad hominem, but you don't have an argument from the beginning. You're just like the sixteen-year-olds who wet their panties whenever Robert Pattinson is seen on a screen, who yell out how "retarted" I am because I don't see the greatness that is Twilight.

The difference between me and Twilight fans is that my opinions are actually correct.

Yeah, that's the difference.

Yeah, that's the difference.

Exactly.

Note to self: Sarcasm on the internet is not a good idea.