So, Wilmore, I have to ask. Why do you simply pick apart people's statements so much? You'd do better to contribute FE ideas that we can use to further our understanding.
Lord Wilmore response possibilities:
- Read the Wiki/Earth not a Globe
- You're not contributing anything either (or something to that affect)
- Or he will just quote me and nitpick away my statement
If you're not willing to read the information we have now, what's the point of supplying new information? Earth Not a Globe is only about 400 pages long and is available for free online, as well as from the Book Depository and Amazon. You have no excuse for not having read it.
He has no counter arguement so he has to resort to jibes like a five year old. Pathetic. Basically he can't argue with me. He KNOWS that nautical mapping and the log data from mariners is pretty difficult data to dispute so now he's resorting to calling us all liars and stupid on various threads. Spat the dummy because he's losing the debate.
You can't 'counter' an argument that doesn't exist. All you do is go arund telling everyone how much evidence there is for RET, without presenting any of it. That is called making statements, not providing evidence.
I've lurked enough to understand what you think and how you think and I know that you wouldn't give my arguments any more consideration if I had read everything linked on this site.
If I don't believe, I'm wrong. That's the FE philosophy.
All I'm saying is, Tom's arguments for FET are outlined at length in Earth Not a Globe. Until you've read that book, his suggestion that you do so remains relevant.