This is getting annoying.
FET is not simpler.Occam's Razor asks us which explanation makes the least number of assumptions. The explanation which makes the least number of assumptions is the simplest explanation. Occam's Razor works in favor of the Flat Earth Theory. Several examples exist below.
What's the simplest explanation; that my experience of existing upon a plane wherever I go and whatever I do is a massive illusion, that my eyes are constantly deceiving me and that I am actually looking at the enormous sphere of the earth spinning through space at tens of thousands of miles an hour, whirling in perpetual epicycles around the universe; or is the simplest explanation that my eyes are not playing tricks on me and that the earth is exactly as it appears?
Your eyes can lie to you. Mirages, hallucinations...you can't trust your eyes completely. You're really ignorant.
What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter straight up at 7 miles per second, and that NASA can do the impossible on a daily basis, explore the cosmos, and constantly wow the nation by landing a man on the moon and sending robots to mars; or is the simplest explanation that they really can't do all of that stuff?
How do you think they built the computer? From scratch. How did they design a car? From scratch. Have you ever seen a rocket go up? I have. Unbelievably ignorant again: "They really can't do all that stuff". Misanthropic much?
When I walk off the edge of a chair and go into free fall while observing the surface of the earth carefully the earth appears to accelerate up towards me. What's the simplest explanation; that there exists hypothetical undiscovered Graviton particles emanating from the earth which allows them to accelerate my body towards the surface through unexplained quantum effects; or is the simplest explanation that this mysterious highly theoretical mechanism does not exist and the earth has just accelerated upwards towards me exactly as I've observed?
Why don't you feel a rush upwards when you hit the ground then? According to you, you're going down, the ground is coming up. You should feel a rush upwards then as you hit the ground.
What's the simplest explanation; that when I look up and see the sun slowly move across the sky over the course of the day, that the globe earth is spinning at over a thousand miles per hour - faster than the speed of sound at the equator - despite me being unable able to feel this centripetal acceleration, or is the simplest explanation that the sun itself is just moving across the sky exactly as I have observed?
Frame of reference. You know how cars next to you on the highway seem not to be moving? It's because you two are going the same speed. You and everything else are moving at the same speed as the Earth. That's why we don't notice or see it.
What's the simplest explanation; that the sun, moon, and stars are enormous bodies of unimaginable mass, size, and distances which represent frontiers to a vast and infinite unknowable universe teeming with alien worlds, galactic civilizations, black holes, novas and nebulae, and phenomena only conceivable in science fiction; or is the simplest explanation that the universe isn't so large or unknown and when we look up at the stars we are just looking at small points of light exactly they appear to be?
Ignorance, ignorance, ignorace. Again, just because you can't see it doesn't mean it's not there. Hell, we could have the same argument about the microscopic world and debate if germs and bacteria exist and make us sick or if scientist are just faking the images for some other conspiracy.
For all your arguments you give a "simpler" answer, but your simpler answer is only simple because it's so ignorant. FET is not supported by Occam's Razor. And you say it yourself:
Occam's Razor asks us which explanation makes the least number of assumptions.
FET: sub moon, anti moon, spotlight sun, bioluminecsence on the moon, bendy light, ice wall
RET: the earth is a globe
Yo could add gravity to RET, but even so RET has far fewer assumptions. I don't understand how you could actually think FET is simpler.