Something just occurred to me. When I first saw this thread, I thought it was pointless and watched with mild interest as a few obvious questions were thrown up along side some more interesting ones. I even tossed in a couple questions once I saw a 'checkmate scenario' present itself. However, as more and more questions were answered by self-proclaimed Christians, two things became obvious. This was a fertile thread to spread Christian propaganda -- something that I did see coming -- and that nearly all the answers provided are based entirely on conjecture -- something that I should have seen coming. Things like, "God cannot do things outside of its nature," or "Angels possess a different form of free-will than mankind," or perhaps most important is the notion that the answerer(s) have a strong enough knowledge on the subject to even be answering. The two former paraphrases are things that can never, nor will ever, be able to be answered without literally evoking deus ex machina. Yet they are presented as factual; as if they satisfy the question entirely. This is where my thought occurred to me that I mentioned in the first sentence.
This thread serves no purpose but to give religion credence where none should exist. By asking questions and having them answered, whether they are truthful answers or not, gives the impression that religion has all the answers. There is no point in trying to corner a Christian with logic, they can always fall back on saying that their deity operates outside the confines of the laws of nature that govern us, or that they cannot pretend to understand the will of an omnipotent being. And while those answers are wholly weightless, they still give the illusion of being answered. After all, the chances of trying to use logic to dissuade a Christian from their faith is extremely difficult. By definition, faith is something that a person must embrace despite any amount of reason, logic, or facts presented to the contrary.
So people, pose your questions wisely.