Gamburtsev Mountains

That's because the ice wall doesn't exist.


FAQ is made from a few people on this site, I'd trust the wealth of information available elsewhere.

ED: also,

A2: In James McIntyre's model, the greater ice wall holds the atmolayer in place.

Nomatter what theory your so called ice wall uses, the Gamburtsev Mountains cannot support it.

James' theory might have the "greater ice wall" holding the atmolayer in, but the Gamburtsev Mountains may be only part of the Ice Wall.  Antarctica as a continent doesn't exist, so your pictures have obviously been created to support the RE model.

So your saying that you believe in what's possible, more than whats probable.

Nice to know.


You should really say that the Bermuda Triangle is the edge of the Earth, atleast people disappear there.

Maybe they found the rest of the Earth?

James' theory might have the "greater ice wall" holding the atmolayer in, but the Gamburtsev Mountains may be only part of the Ice Wall.

Give me some evidence to support your comment.

Antarctica as a continent doesn't exist, so your pictures have obviously been created to support the RE model.

Hold on, what theory of FE are you using here

Maybe you guys should really work together to come up with a widely accepted model.

Maybe you guys should really work together to come up with a widely accepted model.

How do you do that?

Well for one, start finding evidence and not just theories to make a supporting argument that gets rid of all the lesser models.


So far, your entire theory(s) consist of more theories, based on observations.

You haven't proven that your observations are caused by said theories, but are just mere: It's not yellow so it must be blue.


By proof, I mean significant evidence that it exists.

Quote from: flyingmonkey on February 11, 2010, 04:30:11 PM

Maybe you guys should really work together to come up with a widely accepted model.

How do you do that?

By coming up with a model that is [shock horror] widely accepted. Stupid question really.

Quote from: flyingmonkey on February 11, 2010, 04:30:11 PM

Maybe you guys should really work together to come up with a widely accepted model.

How do you do that?

That is one of the best/funniest exchanges on here.  It almost proves to me that you guys have no clue at all. 
Perhaps have one that uses widely agreed upon scientific principles (dare I say proven?)? And perhaps a map/model of earth that fits with all these theories.

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on February 11, 2010, 04:56:01 PM

Quote from: flyingmonkey on February 11, 2010, 04:30:11 PM

Maybe you guys should really work together to come up with a widely accepted model.

How do you do that?

By coming up with a model that is [shock horror] widely accepted. Stupid question really.

A model becomes widely accepted after you come up with it. You can't come up with a model which is inherently or by nature widely accepted.


You come up with a model, and then you try and get people to accept it. You cannot 'come up' with a model that is already widely accepted.

Quote from: 2fst4u on February 11, 2010, 08:15:09 PM

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on February 11, 2010, 04:56:01 PM

Quote from: flyingmonkey on February 11, 2010, 04:30:11 PM

Maybe you guys should really work together to come up with a widely accepted model.

How do you do that?

By coming up with a model that is [shock horror] widely accepted. Stupid question really.

A model becomes widely accepted after you come up with it. You can't come up with a model which is inherently or by nature widely accepted.


You come up with a model, and then you try and get people to accept it. You cannot 'come up' with a model that is already widely accepted.

Wilmore, what he meant was that you need to make a model that will be widely accepted. Perhaps draw a map that is consistent with what we already know about the Earth, such as the distance between different points around the globe.

Wilmore, what he meant was that you need to make a model that will be widely accepted. Perhaps draw a map that is consistent with what we already know about the Earth, such as the distance between different points around the globe.

You mean like this one?


http://www.noirextreme.com/digital/Earth-Color4096.jpg

Quote from: Canadark on February 12, 2010, 06:08:05 AM

Wilmore, what he meant was that you need to make a model that will be widely accepted. Perhaps draw a map that is consistent with what we already know about the Earth, such as the distance between different points around the globe.

You mean like this one?


http://www.noirextreme.com/digital/Earth-Color4096.jpg

No. The continents are stretched towards the poles. Compare the size of Antarctica to Africa.

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on February 12, 2010, 05:52:16 AM

Quote from: 2fst4u on February 11, 2010, 08:15:09 PM

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on February 11, 2010, 04:56:01 PM

Quote from: flyingmonkey on February 11, 2010, 04:30:11 PM

Maybe you guys should really work together to come up with a widely accepted model.

How do you do that?

By coming up with a model that is [shock horror] widely accepted. Stupid question really.

A model becomes widely accepted after you come up with it. You can't come up with a model which is inherently or by nature widely accepted.


You come up with a model, and then you try and get people to accept it. You cannot 'come up' with a model that is already widely accepted.

Wilmore, what he meant was that you need to make a model that will be widely accepted. Perhaps draw a map that is consistent with what we already know about the Earth, such as the distance between different points around the globe.

There are FE'ers working on that all the time. 

Quote from: Canadark on February 12, 2010, 06:08:05 AM

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on February 12, 2010, 05:52:16 AM

Quote from: 2fst4u on February 11, 2010, 08:15:09 PM

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on February 11, 2010, 04:56:01 PM

Quote from: flyingmonkey on February 11, 2010, 04:30:11 PM

Maybe you guys should really work together to come up with a widely accepted model.

How do you do that?

By coming up with a model that is [shock horror] widely accepted. Stupid question really.

A model becomes widely accepted after you come up with it. You can't come up with a model which is inherently or by nature widely accepted.


You come up with a model, and then you try and get people to accept it. You cannot 'come up' with a model that is already widely accepted.

Wilmore, what he meant was that you need to make a model that will be widely accepted. Perhaps draw a map that is consistent with what we already know about the Earth, such as the distance between different points around the globe.

There are FE'ers working on that all the time. 

  Which FE'ers are working on that?  Last I knew, they were all crying poverty.

You know all the FE'ers?

You know all the FE'ers?

There are FE'ers working on that all the time.

Be a little less ambiguous in your responses and you wouldn't have to deal with follow-up questions

I like follow-up questions.

I like follow-up questions.

The pause must be convenient to come up with nonsensical BS.

I don't need time to come up with nonsense!

Quote from: Canadark on February 12, 2010, 06:08:05 AM

Wilmore, what he meant was that you need to make a model that will be widely accepted. Perhaps draw a map that is consistent with what we already know about the Earth, such as the distance between different points around the globe.

You mean like this one?


http://www.noirextreme.com/digital/Earth-Color4096.jpg

No. a straight line on that map != straight line in real life. The only map that can ever be accepted is this one

I don't need time to come up with nonsense!

Really? You seem to have needed 23 minutes for that one...

Are you suggesting that I have nothing to do but come up with one liners at FES all day?

Are you suggesting that I have nothing to do but come up with one liners at FES all day?

Not at all, though you obviously have at least some time to spare. I meant what I said. Short, ambiguous responses give you time to come up with BS answers to valid questions. However, you may correctly infer that I enjoy being a confrontational @sshole who takes pleasure in pointing out idiotic thinking.

Hence this post, my presence here, and the avatar to the left.

Well, actually I don't have anything better to do than come up with one liners at FES all day.  Unless you count the cake I just baked! Yes that was definitely better than a snappy comeback. Also, your retarted.

You know all the FE'ers?

Please name at least one FE'er who is actively working on an accurate FE map.

Why do you still post like an angry noob?

Let me tweak that a little...

Well, actually I don't have anything better to do than come up with one liners at FES all day.  Unless you count the cake I just baked! Yes that was definitely better than a snappy comeback. Also, your you're  retarted retarded.

There. A properly structured & spelled snappy comeback.

Why do you still post like an angry noob?

Grrrr... 

Let me tweak that a little...

Quote from: Space Cowgirl on February 12, 2010, 02:13:31 PM

Well, actually I don't have anything better to do than come up with one liners at FES all day.  Unless you count the cake I just baked! Yes that was definitely better than a snappy comeback. Also, your you're  retarted retarded.

There. A properly structured & spelled snappy comeback.

"your retarted" is a site meme apparently. If you lurk moar, you'll notice everyone does it. Focus on the task at hand instead of grammar plz

Thanks 2fst4u, I'm looking forward to the time when you realize the earth is flat.

Thanks 2fst4u, I'm looking forward to the time when you realize the earth is flat.

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=36546.0

somehow I doubt that day will ever come.