I figured that although this piece of alternative science closely ties in with FE theory itself, it probably belongs in this forum since it does not specifically deal with the Earth itself.
I'm going to present my own hypothesis on the creation of the universe, because as far as I know it has not been considered in a non-religious light by Flat Earthers on this site.
Firstly, it is my conviction that the universe began from not one, but two seperate, infinitely small points. Why is this any less likely that RE Big Bang theory?
I believe that the fundamental differences between dark matter and "normal" matter are down to their seperate points of origin. Both simultaneously and spontaneously exploded in corresponding directions - both explosions headed towards eachother. Do not ask me to explain why this happened - RE Big Bang theorists have no idea why their Big Bang occured either. The matter of why is more a matter for philosophical debate than scientific consideration.
The blankets of dark matter and matter, then, headed towards eachother, accelerating and expanding constantly. It would only be a matter of time before they would collide.
For some reason, normal matter was the first to cave in against the other. This was just down to the chaotic and random nature of the primal universe - it's the same sort of arbitrary occurance as the success of matter over "anti-matter" in conventional cosmology's Big Bang universe.
The blanket of dark matter remained firm, while the normal matter spread out over its surface.
Eventually, the UA (the universal accelerator - the blanket on the dark matter side) would have reached the point of emission for normal matter.
The emitter would have collided violently with the pile of matter heaped on the UA, scattering the matter briefly into space...
...of course, Universal Acceleration means that the UA would quickly collide with the matter, "flattening" it out again.
I hypothesise that this collision event is the source of "background radiation" which RE scientists claim as proof of the Big Bang theory.
With the normal matter of the universe in a state of relative stability, and the UA on a never ending course of expansion and acceleration, the tendancy of matter to react, form compounds and interact in other ways caused larger conglomerations of matter to accumulate. Irregularities in the flatness of the UA would also have "funnelled" matter together in its troughs.
Which leads us almost to the present day. Planets form and life evolves on them.
This is only my own personal hypothesis based on observation and logic, it doesn't represent FE theory as a whole, which has no standardised explanation for the origins of the universe.
Thoughts? Questions?