« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.

  • 88 Replies
  • 24923 Views
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #30 on: January 12, 2010, 03:02:47 AM »
Quote from: dim on January 12, 2010, 12:02:36 AM
Huh.
Then, what is that mirror? If sun is 3000 miles up in the sky, where is that surface it reflects off?

Most likely, it would be higher up than the Sun and located above the region beyond the Ice Wall.

Quote from: flyingmonkey on January 12, 2010, 12:56:40 AM
Not to mention the Sun is a spotlight.

The spotlight model of the Sun is incompatible with the sky mirror hypothesis.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #31 on: January 12, 2010, 03:39:37 AM »
Quote from: Parsifal on January 12, 2010, 03:02:47 AM
Quote from: dim on January 12, 2010, 12:02:36 AM
Huh.
Then, what is that mirror? If sun is 3000 miles up in the sky, where is that surface it reflects off?


Most likely, it would be higher up than the Sun and located above the region beyond the Ice Wall.

Well, it make some sense, but how would it be seen, like what? I would like to see the picture of Antarctic sun. Will we find any difference between what we see here and what is seen there?
Logged
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #32 on: January 12, 2010, 04:22:54 AM »
Quote from: dim on January 12, 2010, 03:39:37 AM
Well, it make some sense, but how would it be seen, like what? I would like to see the picture of Antarctic sun. Will we find any difference between what we see here and what is seen there?

I doubt it, given that none has been observed. It's possible that it reflects twice, to keep the same orientation.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
?

LiceFarm

  • 540
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #33 on: January 12, 2010, 04:29:13 AM »
Quote from: Parsifal on January 11, 2010, 11:43:37 PM
It is a mirror in the sky.

My ice crystal theory is infinitely better than the unproven sky mirror conjecture. ICT is now accepted by most FEers. Please stop damaging FE scholars by posting the same half baked ideas over and over again.
Logged
?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #34 on: January 12, 2010, 04:40:33 AM »
Quote from: LiceFarm on January 12, 2010, 04:29:13 AM
Quote from: Parsifal on January 11, 2010, 11:43:37 PM
It is a mirror in the sky.

My ice crystal theory is infinitely better than the unproven sky mirror conjecture. ICT is now accepted by most FEers. Please stop damaging FE scholars by posting the same half baked ideas over and over again.

Ok, accroding to ICT - how is Polar Day possible in the Antarctica?
Logged
?

Tristan

  • 180
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Earth Proponent
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #35 on: January 12, 2010, 06:38:39 AM »
Quote from: LiceFarm on January 12, 2010, 04:29:13 AM
My ice crystal theory is infinitely better than the unproven sky mirror conjecture. ICT is now accepted by most FEers.

Ice crystal theory?

This I gotta hear.
Logged
Image used in Avatar:
"Duck Dodgers™ in the 24&1/2th Century"
© Warner Brothers Animation
All Rights Reserved
*

Canadark

  • 996
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #36 on: January 12, 2010, 08:07:48 AM »
Quote from: Parsifal on January 11, 2010, 11:43:37 PM
Quote from: dim on January 11, 2010, 11:26:42 PM
What sky mirror. You talking that when the Sun is in the opposite point, some far tens thousand kilometers away sky mirror would work?

Yes. It's very high up, you see. And big.

Quote from: dim on January 11, 2010, 11:26:42 PM
What is Sky mirror btw - where is definition of it?

It is a mirror in the sky.

The fact that your theory requires a giant mirror in the sky to work does not mean that there is a giant mirror in the sky.

It means your theory is wrong.
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 07, 2009, 04:26:37 PM
There is evidence for a NASA conspiracy. Please search.
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #37 on: January 12, 2010, 08:22:03 AM »
Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 08:07:48 AM
The fact that your theory requires a giant mirror in the sky to work does not mean that there is a giant mirror in the sky.

It means your theory is wrong.

Can you prove that there is no giant mirror in the sky?
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
*

Canadark

  • 996
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #38 on: January 12, 2010, 09:27:45 AM »
Quote from: Parsifal on January 12, 2010, 08:22:03 AM
Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 08:07:48 AM
The fact that your theory requires a giant mirror in the sky to work does not mean that there is a giant mirror in the sky.

It means your theory is wrong.

Can you prove that there is no giant mirror in the sky?

Well, yes, I can, but even if I couldn't it would beg this next question:

Can you prove that there is no giant invisible teapot in the sky controlling your every thought?
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 07, 2009, 04:26:37 PM
There is evidence for a NASA conspiracy. Please search.
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #39 on: January 12, 2010, 09:30:01 AM »
Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 09:27:45 AM
Well, yes, I can

Please do.

Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 09:27:45 AM
Can you prove that there is no giant invisible teapot in the sky controlling your every thought?

Irrelevant.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #40 on: January 12, 2010, 06:04:50 PM »
Quote from: Parsifal on January 12, 2010, 09:30:01 AM
Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 09:27:45 AM
Well, yes, I can

Please do.

Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 09:27:45 AM
Can you prove that there is no giant invisible teapot in the sky controlling your every thought?

Irrelevant.


If you want him to answer your point, you might want to answer his, because otherwise he can just go:

Quote from: Canadark
Irrelevant.



If there was some form of sky mirror or any reflective surface, you would at some point on the Earths surface, be able to see both the origin and the reflection of the Sun.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2010, 06:06:33 PM by flyingmonkey »
Logged
*

Canadark

  • 996
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #41 on: January 12, 2010, 08:26:39 PM »
Quote from: Parsifal on January 12, 2010, 09:30:01 AM
Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 09:27:45 AM
Well, yes, I can

Please do.

Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 09:27:45 AM
Can you prove that there is no giant invisible teapot in the sky controlling your every thought?

Irrelevant.

You missed the point.

Big time.
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 07, 2009, 04:26:37 PM
There is evidence for a NASA conspiracy. Please search.
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #42 on: January 12, 2010, 08:44:04 PM »
Quote from: Canadark on January 12, 2010, 08:26:39 PM
You missed the point.

Big time.

I don't miss points.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • +0/-0
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #43 on: January 12, 2010, 09:08:29 PM »
Well, I've said why a sky mirror or reflective surface wouldn't work.
Logged
?

d00gz

  • 638
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #44 on: January 13, 2010, 12:02:28 AM »
Guys, Robo knows there is no such thing as a sky mirror. He knows it's totally implausible, and as there is no proof, and nothing to suggest such a thing could possibly exist outside of his head, i urge you to STOP FEEDING THE TROLL.

All you'll do is get more and more annoyed at how retarded he appears to be.
Logged
?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #45 on: January 13, 2010, 12:26:44 AM »
Okay.
Where is Tom!?

How is polar day possible in the Antarctica.

The one possible answer: they are lying to us, that there are polar days in antarctica. And as i never been there, i would better trust this. But here is no Tom, therefore my faith is leaking.... ((
Logged
?

LiceFarm

  • 540
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #46 on: January 13, 2010, 05:13:53 PM »
Quote from: dim on January 12, 2010, 04:40:33 AM
Quote from: LiceFarm on January 12, 2010, 04:29:13 AM
Quote from: Parsifal on January 11, 2010, 11:43:37 PM
It is a mirror in the sky.

My ice crystal theory is infinitely better than the unproven sky mirror conjecture. ICT is now accepted by most FEers. Please stop damaging FE scholars by posting the same half baked ideas over and over again.

Ok, accroding to ICT - how is Polar Day possible in the Antarctica?

According to ICT angular reflection of the complex geometry of the ice crystals creates a total reflective state.
Logged
?

Logic Volcano

  • 10
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #47 on: January 13, 2010, 09:22:42 PM »
Quote from: LiceFarm on January 13, 2010, 05:13:53 PM
Quote from: dim on January 12, 2010, 04:40:33 AM
Quote from: LiceFarm on January 12, 2010, 04:29:13 AM
Quote from: Parsifal on January 11, 2010, 11:43:37 PM
It is a mirror in the sky.

My ice crystal theory is infinitely better than the unproven sky mirror conjecture. ICT is now accepted by most FEers. Please stop damaging FE scholars by posting the same half baked ideas over and over again.

Ok, accroding to ICT - how is Polar Day possible in the Antarctica?

According to ICT angular reflection of the complex geometry of the ice crystals creates a total reflective state.

So how would this attribute to 24 hour daylight in Antarctica?
Logged
?

Tristan

  • 180
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Earth Proponent
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #48 on: January 14, 2010, 05:41:36 AM »
Quote from: LiceFarm on January 13, 2010, 05:13:53 PM
Quote from: dim on January 12, 2010, 04:40:33 AM
Quote from: LiceFarm on January 12, 2010, 04:29:13 AM
Quote from: Parsifal on January 11, 2010, 11:43:37 PM
It is a mirror in the sky.

My ice crystal theory is infinitely better than the unproven sky mirror conjecture. ICT is now accepted by most FEers. Please stop damaging FE scholars by posting the same half baked ideas over and over again.

Ok, accroding to ICT - how is Polar Day possible in the Antarctica?

According to ICT angular reflection of the complex geometry of the ice crystals creates a total reflective state.

Um.... okay.

Could you elaborate on that?
Logged
Image used in Avatar:
"Duck Dodgers™ in the 24&1/2th Century"
© Warner Brothers Animation
All Rights Reserved
?

grifoli

  • 213
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #49 on: January 14, 2010, 08:31:48 AM »
Don't try to explain robosteve why a skymiror cannot exist... he doesn't understand why Venus appears black when it moves across the Sun ...
Logged
Quote from: Neil Armstrong
It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
?

Gigamonsta

  • 343
  • +0/-0
  • Earth Shape Agnostic (ESA) - QUESTION EVERYTHING
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #50 on: January 14, 2010, 08:34:56 AM »
its possible. many ancients, like ptolemy, believed in crystal spheres in the sky. these could have formed over time. i'd say that its possibl that these spheres exist and r the "sky mirror" that is so spoken of. remember that gallileo the liar and nasa l8er came in and were the ones who did tghe whole thing debunking that idea
Logged
?

d00gz

  • 638
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #51 on: January 14, 2010, 09:29:22 AM »
Quote from: Gigamonsta on January 14, 2010, 08:34:56 AM
its possible. many ancients, like ptolemy, believed in crystal spheres in the sky. these could have formed over time. i'd say that its possibl that these spheres exist and r the "sky mirror" that is so spoken of. remember that gallileo the liar and nasa l8er came in and were the ones who did tghe whole thing debunking that idea

Fancy re-typing that in English for me?

Cheers
Logged
?

Gigamonsta

  • 343
  • +0/-0
  • Earth Shape Agnostic (ESA) - QUESTION EVERYTHING
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #52 on: January 14, 2010, 11:43:21 AM »
Quote from: d00gz on January 14, 2010, 09:29:22 AM
Quote from: Gigamonsta on January 14, 2010, 08:34:56 AM
its possible. many ancients, like ptolemy, believed in crystal spheres in the sky. these could have formed over time. i'd say that its possibl that these spheres exist and r the "sky mirror" that is so spoken of. remember that gallileo the liar and nasa l8er came in and were the ones who did tghe whole thing debunking that idea

Fancy re-typing that in English for me?

Cheers

fancy me by responding 2 my posts content?
Logged
*

SupahLovah

  • 5130
  • +0/-0
  • Santasaurus Rex!
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #53 on: January 14, 2010, 11:50:19 AM »
As soon as we can understand it.
Logged
"Study Gravitation; It's a field with a lot of potential!"
?

Gigamonsta

  • 343
  • +0/-0
  • Earth Shape Agnostic (ESA) - QUESTION EVERYTHING
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #54 on: January 14, 2010, 11:54:07 AM »
look up idea of crystal spheres that ancients like ptolemey observed
Logged
*

Canadark

  • 996
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #55 on: January 14, 2010, 07:14:00 PM »
Quote from: Gigamonsta on January 14, 2010, 11:54:07 AM
look up idea of crystal spheres that ancients like ptolemey observed

So now Ptolemy should be treated as a scientist with authority, eh?

Didn't he do some experiment about the shape of the Earth? Hmmmmm....
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 07, 2009, 04:26:37 PM
There is evidence for a NASA conspiracy. Please search.
?

d00gz

  • 638
  • +0/-0
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #56 on: January 15, 2010, 12:32:14 AM »
Quote from: Gigamonsta on January 14, 2010, 11:43:21 AM
Quote from: d00gz on January 14, 2010, 09:29:22 AM
Quote from: Gigamonsta on January 14, 2010, 08:34:56 AM
its possible. many ancients, like ptolemy, believed in crystal spheres in the sky. these could have formed over time. i'd say that its possibl that these spheres exist and r the "sky mirror" that is so spoken of. remember that gallileo the liar and nasa l8er came in and were the ones who did tghe whole thing debunking that idea

Fancy re-typing that in English for me?

Cheers

fancy me by responding 2 my posts content?

What?
Logged
?

Tristan

  • 180
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Earth Proponent
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #57 on: January 15, 2010, 04:28:46 AM »
Quote from: Canadark on January 14, 2010, 07:14:00 PM
Quote from: Gigamonsta on January 14, 2010, 11:54:07 AM
look up idea of crystal spheres that ancients like ptolemey observed

So now Ptolemy should be treated as a scientist with authority, eh?

Didn't he do some experiment about the shape of the Earth? Hmmmmm....

Oh, Snap!
Logged
Image used in Avatar:
"Duck Dodgers™ in the 24&1/2th Century"
© Warner Brothers Animation
All Rights Reserved
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #58 on: January 15, 2010, 04:42:13 AM »
Quote from: Canadark on January 14, 2010, 07:14:00 PM
Didn't he do some experiment about the shape of the Earth? Hmmmmm....

Nope.
Logged
?

dim

  • 404
  • +0/-0
  • More overpowered than Aristotel.
Re: Hmm, will you make me a RE'ers by answering this.
« Reply #59 on: January 15, 2010, 05:39:11 AM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on January 15, 2010, 04:42:13 AM
Quote from: Canadark on January 14, 2010, 07:14:00 PM
Didn't he do some experiment about the shape of the Earth? Hmmmmm....

Nope.

Tom, please, answer my question i started the thread about...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »