I think its funy how FET says it has science backing it up, but the science is little more than plausible speculation and relies on the conspiracy to be anything close to true.
But I made a different thread about that.
And I say again, why do my threads always get hijacked?
I think its because FE'ers like to change the subject at random.
My question in the OP was not to prove RET false or FET true, but since you all seemed to have jumped to that conclusion, than changed the subject and argued over unrelated things for 2 pages, let me clarify the original question.
Tom Bishop himself said earlier that science has "proven" FET (although as I said, most of the science if flimsy and relies on vast amount of accepted and tested science to be fabricated) so I was asking to a list of links to these scientific experiments (because no one would have the audacity to claim any science is true/proven without knowing that it had been tested by various independent and unafilliated scientists) and also for links to any evidence of the "Conspiracy" or anything that debunks any of RET.
This was NOT a request for proof, but a request for knowledge so that I could better understand the ground FET is placed on.
To that end, I ask all debate in this thread cease immediately and be moved to another thread.
I further request that any posts by FE'ers saying that they do not have to help me understand their theory, because the burden of discovery is on me (or something along those lines) not be posted.
Furthermore, I request that any post by anyone which attempts to ignore my request and instead nitpick at my grammar/semantics not be posted.
Thank you.